Skip to comments.Pelosi says Trump lawyers have 'disgraced' themselves, suggests disbarment
Posted on 01/30/2020 10:18:59 AM PST by jazusamo
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday hammered the lawyers leading President Trump's impeachment defense, saying they've trampled on the Constitution while questioning how they've been allowed to keep their jobs.
"I don't know how they can retain their lawyer status, in the comments that they're making," Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol.
Pelosi was responding largely to comments made Wednesday evening by Alan Dershowitz, a celebrity lawyer on Trump's legal team, who asserted on the Senate floor that presidents cannot be impeached for actions designed to boost their reelections if they believe that retaining a grip on the White House is in the best interest of the country. And "every public official I know," he added, considers that to be the case.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," Dershowitz said.
The exception, said Dershowitz, an opinion contributor to The Hill, would be cases where the conduct violated a specific law. The Democrats' two impeachment articles, charging Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, fall outside the federal criminal code.
"The articles of impeachment violate the Constitution," Trump's leading lawyers, Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone, said at the outset of the Senate trial. "They are defective in their entirety."
Democrats have vehemently rejected the White House arguments, saying impeachment is an inherently political not judicial response designed to protect the country from elected officials who violate the public trust, crime or none. Their impeachment case hinges on allegations that Trump violated that trust in withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine to press the country's leaders to find dirt on his political rivals.
Pelosi on Thursday accused Trump's Republican allies of trying "to dismantle the Constitution" in their defense of the president.
"Some of them are even lawyers," she said. "Imagine that you would say ever, of any president, no matter who he or she is or whatever party if the president thinks that his or her presidency ... is good for the country, then any action is justified including encouraging a foreign government to have an impact on our elections.
"[That] is exactly what our Founders were opposed to and they feared," she added. "I don't think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president's behavior should be."
Pelosi's comments came several hours before the Senate launched the ninth day of the impeachment trial, featuring the second day when senators will be allowed to ask questions of Trump's defense team and the House Democrats' prosecuting the case.
A central battle throughout the Senate process has revolved around questions of whether new witnesses and material evidence, which has emerged since the House voted to impeach Trump last month, will be allowed to appear.
Democrats have argued for the new information, noting that every other Senate impeachment trial in the nation's history has featured witnesses. Republicans are virtually united in their opposition to that plan, saying it was the job of the House, not the Senate, to conduct the underlying investigation.
One witness, in particular, is a focus of the fight: John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, has offered to testify before the Senate under subpoena. And his forthcoming book includes first-hand allegations of the president telling him directly that he was withholding aid to Ukraine to secure politically tinged investigations into his Democratic rivals a direct contradiction of Trump's defense.
The Senate is expected to vote on the question of whether to call witnesses on Friday. At least two Republicans Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have indicated they're likely to support that strategy. Democrats, however, need four defectors to secure the new information.
A wildcard in that debate is John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court who's presiding over the Senate trial.
Pelosi on Thursday said a Senate vote to acquit Trump would be invalid without calling new witnesses.
"He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial; and you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation," she said.
She also called on Roberts to step in and break a tie vote, in the event that three Republican senators vote for witnesses, creating a 50-50 tally. "I would think that they would have confidence in the chief justice of the United States," she said. "That's interesting to me that they're afraid of breaking a tie with the chief justice of the United States."
Pelosi declined to say if the House committees that have investigated Trump's pressure campaign in Ukraine the issue that led to Trump's impeachment last month would move to subpoena Bolton if the Senate does not.
"This is in the Senate now," she said. "We'll see what happens after that."
How can they have trampled on the Constitution when Pelousi has spent her entire political career using it as a tampon ?
She has to have a way to say the whole senate process was tainted so she doesn’t get drawn and quartered by the base.
Though for her that might be a better look.
Why don’t they just drop the pretenses and admit that they want to line us all against walls and shoot us?
The media would not criticize them for it. That’s why they get away with such outlandish behavior. We really are facing an attempted coup and ultimate dictatorship.
It’s hardly possible for her to BE more vile
Pelousy should be ashamed of herself and the lynch mob she claims is a political party.
Third in line, don’t make it any worse than it is!
A vodka soaked, dementia riddled old hag as Speaker of the House. Pathetic. What’s worse is, she can spew this nonsense, and the media will hang on every word as if it was divinely inspired wisdom.
Well, Nancy, if you’re going to tell a lie, you might as well tell a big one. (Where have we heard that before?)
Wow, she’s gone nuclear projection.
I’ve said for months that they are like the car thief being chased by cops in those videos. Once the chase starts, everyone knows it’s not going to end well for the driver of the stolen car, but they never stop. They always end up against a tree, or sandwiched between cop cars riddled with bullets.
This chase is very close to that point. The desperation is tangible.
Third in line; Pence is still there, as is Trump (and shall remain).
I believe that statement is SanFran, “The Princess” Pelosi idea of what it means to “loose gracefully.”
Crazy Aunt Nan.
It's a fool-proof scam, guaranteed to work.
Send tainted or sham articles in the first place. Assert all sorts of bogus theories, go full Alice in Wonderland. The result in the senate is guaranteed to follow the lead. Blame the senate for the whole thing.
This can work over and over and over, because the press and the senate play along as though the articles are serious in the first place.
Pelosi keeps proving that her age is warping her brain cells. She couldn’t have a conversation with any of them.
If she’s such a ‘master strategist’ why does she have to do everything by blunt force?
Okay loser. Since the house failed to do it’s job, the PDJT lawyers are the fidiots. Sad sack nanzi.
impeach nancy for bringing a frivolous impeachment. how’s that, you old wrinkled grey beaver?
“The other side’s lawyer should be disbarred”, said no winner ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.