Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harvard Law Student, Others Trash Antonin Scalia
The Floridian ^ | Javier Manjarres

Posted on 01/29/2020 3:11:10 PM PST by nickcarraway

It’s a new year, but nothing much has changed since 2019 as far as how dumb and ignorant some college kids can be.

Yeah, you can chalk it up as kids just being young and dumb, but when a graduate student and some other college kids from several of America’s most prestigious law schools and colleges decide to express their deep disdain for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, well, some of us take notice.

Daniel Espo, who according to his Facebook profile is studying or had studied at Harvard Law School, expressed his distaste for the late Justice Scalia, another Harvard Law School graduate when he wrote “guess who isn’t going to have a happy new year” on a post of a picture of Scalia’s actual tombstone.

Espo went further, riling up other anti-Scalia “students,” saying that “it’s just too bad Kissinger is still around.”

Hating on Scalia is disturbing. Regardless of what side of the political aisle you find yourself, respect should always be given to all elected officials and confirmed jurists, regardless of how they voted or ruled.

One Emory University and Old Navy alum, Duy Nyugen, went as far as to say that Scalia didn’t deserve the honor and respect he is given after his death because according to Nyugen, he “didn’t earn it while living.”

“If Scalia didn’t want people to trash his memory, maybe he should have tried harder at not being a dick,” added Nyugen

Hmm? I am not sure why “Little Duy” would post something so vulgar or offensive, but maybe he is deflected away from a “shortcoming” he may have?

Enter more frustrated kids.

Nicholas Van Erp, Brad Storch, Connor Peth, and others, decided to turn to the same toilet bowl they appear to think from.

Let’s just remember that in 1986, Judge Antonin Scalia was confirmed by the U.S. Senate 98-0. That’s 98-0.

And you know what, current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden was part of the Senate Democratic Caucus who voted that day. Ouch!

Biden once said that Justice Scalia was “one of our most influential justices.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: alito; scalia; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: nickcarraway

More wisdom from the “The Constitution Is A Living Document” crowd.


21 posted on 01/29/2020 3:42:52 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Exactly. See my post above. That is a mealy mouthed, weak sentiment I would just as soon take a leak on.

This country was founded on the rough principle that nobody is deserving of respect simply because of a conferred title, especially if their actions are not worthy of respect.


22 posted on 01/29/2020 3:42:53 PM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

I most certainly don’t. That one line raised my hackles.


23 posted on 01/29/2020 3:43:57 PM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Again, I am assuming (and hoping) you misunderstood our responses.


24 posted on 01/29/2020 3:46:49 PM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Interesting and cool story, I just hate giving those asshats of the lung turds a click ... ever.


25 posted on 01/29/2020 3:46:50 PM PST by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: semimojo; rlmorel; bagster
Well, I guess I am more old-fashioned U.S. I think we should vehemently, disagree with someone, but also I believe in traditional values.

I wouldn't tweet out a picture of the gravestone of some politician I disagree with and write something nasty. What's the point.

Also, it seems like you guys don't disagree with some of the ways Trump has been treated, you just disagree with the target. You would agree with it if it was against Obama?

Certainly, I don't respect many elected officials and jurists in one sense. But, I won't be giving up my dignity and beliefs and acting like a leftist idiot. Nothing would be served by that.

26 posted on 01/29/2020 3:48:32 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Would you engage in some like the women’s march with those stupid hats and profane signs, like they do that last few years? Or are you a mature conservative who realizes that would only reflect on you, not the opponent?


27 posted on 01/29/2020 3:50:18 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bagster

You stole my thought ; )


28 posted on 01/29/2020 3:51:06 PM PST by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Yeah, I got a lot of grief from Freepers over the years because I refuse to call a skunk cabbage a rose just because they were elected to an office, served in the military or they are old.

In a perfect world their hearts would be changed and I could call them friend. It is not a perfect world.

And I will continue to call out the people who are trying to destroy me and mine.

29 posted on 01/29/2020 3:52:46 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

As Tony Soprano said: “Those that want respect, give respect.”


30 posted on 01/29/2020 3:59:07 PM PST by Maceman (Trump Trumps Hate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
So you two would post a tweet of some deceased jurist’s gravestone and insult him?

And furthermore. I'd also piss on Bill and Hillary Clinton's grave. And Jane Fonda. And TONS of other people I can think of and some I can't.

We fought an entire revolution to escape a monarchy, where you were forced to 'respect' so-called 'leaders'.

Here in America, we are free. People given authority by us need to respect US, not the other way around.

#FreeBornManInTheUSA


31 posted on 01/29/2020 4:08:18 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bagster
We fought an entire revolution to escape a monarchy, where you were forced to 'respect' so-called 'leaders'.

You should tell that to the huge number of freepers who worship the monarchy and hate Americans.

32 posted on 01/29/2020 4:17:55 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
You should tell that to the huge number of freepers who worship the monarchy and hate Americans.

Okay.

*megaphone*

Consider yourself told, Tories!!!!


33 posted on 01/29/2020 4:23:05 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bagster

If the Clintons can’t get you to do that, then they succeeded in their mission.


34 posted on 01/29/2020 4:23:08 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Wait. Can't get me to do what, exactly? I don't folla.


35 posted on 01/29/2020 4:25:55 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel; nickcarraway
I stand by that.

What he said.


36 posted on 01/29/2020 4:37:55 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“but when a graduate student and some other college kids from several of America’s most prestigious law schools and colleges decide to express their deep disdain for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, well, some of us take notice.”

Harvard law isn’t prestigious due to high achievement. It is exclusive for the ruling class and a few tokens. That is not the same as good. Their only metric of success is that their graduates rise in the establishment. Which is no surprise because they were picked to go there due to connections with the establishment.

But I see no evidence of respectable thinkers coming out of there. Certainly not compared to numerous non-Ivy schools.


37 posted on 01/29/2020 4:47:31 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Thank You.


38 posted on 01/29/2020 4:53:05 PM PST by sauropod (If women are upset at TrumpÂ’s naughty words, who bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Grey?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Foreign snowflakes. Even worse than domestic ones.

HEY ASSHOLES! GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY!!


39 posted on 01/29/2020 4:54:32 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Ban Carbon Dioxide! It's twice as bad as Carbon Monoxide!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; bagster
nickcarraway, I am not sure where you are coming from. Let's try to have a real discussion, so I won't fly off the handle. I read your post all the way to the end, I hope you will do the same for my response.

How do I go from refusing to give respect to someone (whose actions not only do not merit respect, but actively call for complete disgust and total rejection) to someone who would tweet out a picture of some politician's gravestone or wearing a hat that is supposed to resemble a vagina?

I completely do not understand the jump you make there.

Nowhere...NOWHERE in my post or bagster's post did either of us approve of ANYTHING those people did. As a matter of fact, if you read our initial posts, his was one word, and mine was two very short sentences, both of us focused on that ONE repulsive sentiment by the author "...respect should always be given to all elected officials and confirmed jurists, regardless of how they voted or ruled..."

We were speaking of that ONE sentiment: that we should respect someone with a title simply because they have a title? I wholly reject that concept root and branch. And I don't reject it because I am on one side of a political argument or another. I reject it because the actions of the people I refuse to "respect" COMPEL me to reject it.

I have a personal rule that over the years I have come to embrace over the years, I call it "Default Respect" and will touch on it at the end. I hope you will read that far. But I have specific examples of why I don't respect "ALL elected officials and confirmed jurists"

I could go on, but you get the idea.

There is one common thread through all of these examples-all these people should have held respect, but did not because of specific actions they took or activities they engaged in.

You mentioned you are old fashioned in some respect. I am too. My parents taught me two major things:

  1. To respect people until they demonstrated to me that they were undeserving of respect.

  2. That I should not expect people to respect me, but should earn their respect, and that was true respect.

I have developed a code for myself that I call "Default Respect". It means that I respect EVERYONE and treat with them as such, until they give me cause to not respect them.

In the case of all of these people and nearly the entire Democrat party along with the Leftist jurists who inhabit our court systems, they are attacking our Constitution and this country I love and owe so much to, and I know enough to see their actions WILL both bankrupt it and destroy it.

I cannot respect those people. I will not. That doesn't mean I have to tweet rude pictures of their gravesites or put a Pussy Hat on my head. But I damn sure will not respect them because they have a title, are elected, or sit behind a judge's bench.

I have had my current Free Republic tagline for some time, and that is because I think it is true: "Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both."

40 posted on 01/29/2020 7:39:51 PM PST by rlmorel (Finding middle ground with tyranny or evil makes you either a tyrant or evil. Often both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson