Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

READ: Mark Levin Issues Twitter Barrage Stomping On NY Times, Bolton, And GOP Senators Thinking Of Joining Dems To Call More Witnesses
Daily Wire ^ | January 27, 2020 | Hank Berrien

Posted on 01/27/2020 1:07:12 PM PST by conservative98

On Monday, radio and TV host Mark Levin issued a barrage of tweets regarding The New York Times article with excerpts from former national security advisor John Bolton’s new book, excerpts which prompted much hand-wringing among some GOP senators about calling new witnesses in the Senate impeachment trail targeting President Trump. Levin stomped on the Times, Bolton, and the GOP senators who seem to be considering capitulating to Democrats’ demands that witnesses be called who did not testify in the House impeachment trial.

Levin began by cutting directly to the heart of the matter:

If every word of this New York Times story is true, which I doubt as it’s another politically timed leak, how does this change anything? As a matter of FACT, there was no quid pro quo. And there’s still no evidence to the contrary.

Then he segued to Bolton’s stated outrage that excerpts from the upcoming book had been leaked:

Let me get this straight. John Bolton and his lawyer Chuck Cooper submitted the book manuscript to the NSC for review, which is notoriously known for leaking, on the eve of the impeachment trial, and they’re now surprised about a cherry-picked leak?We are left with a politically-motivated, last-minute, cherry-picked leak from anonymous sources to the Trump-hating New York Times. And now the media attention is focused on the Democrat demands, in hopes of turning a handful of Republicans susceptible to these tactics to join the Democrats in a call for witnesses — which, of course, the House Democrats opposed during their impeachment inquiry.

Levin bluntly predicted, “If the GOP falls for this they’ll lose the Senate.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...


TOPICS: Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Maine; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: New York; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: alexandervindman; bolton; congress; johnbolton; levin; marklevin; massachusetts; mexico; michigan; mittwit; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; romney; susancollins; trump; ukraine; utah; yevgenyvindman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: conservative98

“If the GOP falls for this they’ll lose the Senate.”

At least I promise to do everything I can to remove them.


21 posted on 01/27/2020 1:47:01 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I don’t think that is what motivates them. Romney anyway. I think he’s as compromised as Biden and for the same crimes. He plays for the other team

What does throwing the election a few weeks after
Benghazi look like to people?


22 posted on 01/27/2020 1:47:27 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Wouldn’t calling witnesses under their rules not be a bad thing? I don’t like the GOP, I believe they’re spineless idiots, but I don’t see this as a bad thing. Call witnesses at prime time and make them (Dems) look like idiots-—Tie up all these senators from campaigning as well.


23 posted on 01/27/2020 1:48:02 PM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dware

The traitors in control of both houses will make the last four years seem like a Sunday church picnic.


24 posted on 01/27/2020 1:51:12 PM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Not with what’s her face at the helm.


25 posted on 01/27/2020 1:52:27 PM PST by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
Calling witnesses is a wild card but is probably in President Trumps favor.

Its very bad for the Senate Republicans and could cost the majority

26 posted on 01/27/2020 2:00:44 PM PST by rdcbn ( Referentiai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY; conservative98

Mr Bolton had a Top Secret with Special Compartmentalized Information (TS/SCI) access while he headed the NSC. He IS REQUIRED by law to submit any manuscript or article he writes that covers his period as head of NSC to it to be reviewed for the existence of any classified information that might be in it. Thus he had no choice in NOT submitting it to the NSC.

I know this because I had a similar caveat on what I might write that covered the years I was in the Army as an active duty soldier and afterward as a Dept Army civilian with TS/SCI access. I could write and publish whatever I wanted, without sending it to the Dept of Army for classification review, only if it was pre-Vietnam War history/fiction.

This is another case of needing to find the NSC Staff member who leaked the information and prosecuting that person. Until that happens or his book is published, I will consider Mr. Bolton of any allegations by the NY Slimes.


27 posted on 01/27/2020 2:11:43 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

The so called “moderate” GOP senators (McCain, Romney, Collins) are more afraid of NY Times than they are of the republican base voters.
............................................
I doubt that McShame is afraid of anything on Earth right now!


28 posted on 01/27/2020 2:19:12 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (To save America the Left MUST be aggressively attacked on every front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“To be a contrarian I’m thinking bring him in and get it over with deal with it and get the acquittal.”

It wouldn’t happen quickly. Trump would almost certainly claim executive privilege, so that matter would have to go to a district court, an appeals court and, possibly, the Supreme Court. That would take weeks, maybe even months.


29 posted on 01/27/2020 2:30:55 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“To be a contrarian I’m thinking bring him in and get it over with deal with it and get the acquittal.”

It wouldn’t happen quickly. Trump would almost certainly claim executive privilege, so that matter would have to go to a district court, an appeals court and, possibly, the Supreme Court. That would take weeks, maybe even months.


30 posted on 01/27/2020 2:31:20 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

My apologies for double-dipping.


31 posted on 01/27/2020 2:32:30 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; SMARTY; conservative98

And I just heard Joe DiGenova being interviewed about the “Bolton quotation.” He gave this important information: LTC Vindman’s twin brother is the person to whom the NSC assigned the declassification review of Bolton’s manuscript.

I recommend that Yevgennihy Vindman be investigated as the possible leaker of Bolton’s manuscript.


32 posted on 01/27/2020 3:25:43 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
McCain?

Why are you uttering the name of a dead man that has zero involvement anymore?

33 posted on 01/27/2020 3:32:27 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
It is very doubtful that the publishers have even seen the contents of Bolton’s book. Even sending the manuscript to the publishers before it has been vetted for classified and privileged contents would be criminally actionable for Bolton, because that would be placing those contents in the hands of people NOT cleared to see those data.

The book was sold, most likely on a barebones outline to the publisher and Bolton’s name and position, not on a manuscript.

My Dad had a high security clearance and had the guidelines on ANYTHING he wanted to publish, even fiction.

The leak, if there really is one, came from the NSC vetting process people, most likely Lt.Col Yevgeny Vindman, Alexander Vindman’s twin brother who is in charge of vetting such manuscripts. Talk about conflicts of interest!

Only after that vetting for classified processing is completed and the DOJ has had their time with it for privilege editing can it be sent to the publisher for printing. Something STINKS here. I cannot see how the President was blindsided by this unless it was deliberately done by people in the NSC who elected not to pass the information up the chain of command.

34 posted on 01/27/2020 4:00:31 PM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Let us not forget that on the 17 of January a NSC night ranking individual was escorted from the White House grounds because of an ongoing National Security investigation. Could quite possibly be that he was a leaker.


35 posted on 01/27/2020 4:12:27 PM PST by V V Camp Enari 67-68 (Viet Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Aria
The republicans in the senate are begging the democrats to come up with a valid reason to vote GUILTY.

Mark my words - this is a long way from being over

36 posted on 01/27/2020 4:28:37 PM PST by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Aria
The republicans in the senate are begging the democrats to come up with a valid reason to vote GUILTY.

Mark my words - this is a long way from being over

37 posted on 01/27/2020 4:28:37 PM PST by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

WHAT!!! You can’t make this crap up.

“Vindman’s twin brother is the person to whom the NSC assigned the declassification review of Bolton’s manuscript”


38 posted on 01/27/2020 4:38:10 PM PST by Captain7seas (UN EXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Captain7seas

Unfortunately , this deep corruption may only be resolved by very uncomfortable actions. Sad.


39 posted on 01/27/2020 4:57:45 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Unlike rats, congressional pubbies don’t know what to do with power.


40 posted on 01/27/2020 5:07:45 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson