Ruth Nader Ginsberg: Senators Can be Disqualified from Upcoming Impeachment Trial if they are Not Impartial

Gateway Pundit ^ | Dec 19, 2019 | Jim Hoft

[White MAGA Man]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke with the BBC this week about the upcoming impeachment trial in the US Senate.

During her questioning Justice Ginsburg suggested that US Senators could be disqualified from the proceedings if they are not impartial.

[Swirl]

Does this mean the democratic senators running against Trump for president have to be disqualified since they certainly are not impartial?

[olesigh]

Apparently she doesn’t apply that to the house. Another unethical comment from ruthie

[rawcatslyentist]

Sureas heck didn't stop the House haters!

Is it warm enough for ya Roofie?

[dhs12345]

King Ruthie, of course.

[Sacajaweau]

Interfering in an impeachment case is probably grounds to impeach her.

[PIF]

Actually yes, now we know the next step in the plan.

---

Her Plan end goal: President Pelosi.

[Agatsu77]

So she is saying that all of the partial Democrats that voted for an impeachment based on NO facts are disqualified?

That sound right to me! Therefore there has been no impeachment!

[MarMema]

Oh just move on already.

[McGavin999]

That would be every democrat senator who would benefit from dirtying up President Trump.

[rawcatslyentist]

Well we all know Nanzi is incapable of hate! She just loves killing infants!

[gunnut]

“ The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.”

[piasa]

Who and what army is going to disqualify them?

[central_va]

Speaking from the grave, almost.

[Jim Noble]

Senators Can be Disqualified from Upcoming Impeachment Trial if they are Not Impartial

And remember, conviction is "by 2/3 of Senators present", not by 67 Senators.

Could this really be the plan? Reduce the jury pool by disqualifying pro Trump votes until we get to 2/3 of the rump to convict?

[ScottinVA]

Such as Amy Klobuchar, who has already stated her intention to vote “guilty?”

[cgbg]

For those who do not believe—I say RBG proves there is life after death!

[tired&retired]

That means Ruthie needs to disqualify herself for the anti Trump statements she made.

[MountainWalker]

Would be a great time for her to take a long overdue dirt nap just to remind the rubes that Trump is still president.

[j.havenfarm]

I bless my FRiends who criticize people who yearn on these pages for the death of these tyrant. I understand where they’re coming from. If she’d resign to spend her final days with her family, then I wish her another hundred years. Failing that she can’t die fast enough for me.

[Antoninus]

Listening to a political partisan like this harridan screech about impartiality is a joke.