Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The most destructive hurricanes are hitting the U.S. more often
AP via NBC ^ | 11 11 2019 | Staff

Posted on 11/11/2019 6:05:17 PM PST by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: yesthatjallen

VSGPDJT is hitting back against the Hoax Deniers.


21 posted on 11/11/2019 6:23:37 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
The original man made global warming claim was there would be an increase in frequency and intensity of hurricanes.

Neither have proven true.

With this new metric they can now claim storms are getting larger by estimating their "Area of Total Destruction".

New rules, new claims.

22 posted on 11/11/2019 6:24:36 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Even the average termperatures seem more averagy than they once were.


23 posted on 11/11/2019 6:24:44 PM PST by tinyowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The real cause of climate change
http://americanskynews.com/articles-a.ht


24 posted on 11/11/2019 6:24:49 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
FACT: More than twice as many major hurricanes struck the U.S. in 1910-1919 than in 2010-2019.

Major Hurricane strikes on U.S. mainland (2010-2019)
Cat 5 - H. Michael - Florida - 2018
Cat 4 - H. Irma - Florida - 2017
Cat 4 - H. Harvey - Texas - 2017

Major Hurricane strikes on U.S. mainland (1910-1919)
Cat 4 - unnamed - Texas 1915
Cat 3 - unnamed - Louisiana - 1915
Cat 3 - unnamed - Mississippi - 1915
Cat 4 - unnamed - Texas - 1916
Cat 3 - unnamed - Florida - 1917
Cat 3 - unnamed - Louisiana - 1918
Cat 4 - unnamed - Florida - 1919

source

25 posted on 11/11/2019 6:25:11 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s Trump’s fault.


26 posted on 11/11/2019 6:27:46 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Total Bullchet article.

Joe Bastardi showed the NOAA forecast from two weeks ago which had the eastern US being above average for temps this week.

The model changed about a week ago to show the cold.

How can we trust climate change models 40 years out when they can’t get it right a week ahead of time?

Bastardi’s video from yesterday. Scroll down if not readily visible.

https://www.weatherbell.com/#premium


27 posted on 11/11/2019 6:28:55 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Awww, come on guys, you know we really have messed up, why, our global warming control failure has gotten so bad that even the sun has been compromised, and is now suffering so much that it has entered into a solar minimum and is trying to undo our warming problem....

See how everything is our fault?


28 posted on 11/11/2019 6:31:11 PM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

It’s cyclical, like sunspots and snowfall.

I wish some of these climatologists would take a few minutes to realize we have 200 years of records; 125 years of them are accurate out of 4 billion years of earth history.

Climate change may be happening, but sea levels have been hundreds of feet higher and lower, CO2 has been all over the place, and there have always been big storms.

Changing the metrics is fine—but you cannot assign assumptions to storms that were not measured. It doesn’t make any sense.


29 posted on 11/11/2019 6:32:25 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

In other news, Hillary received more popular votes than Trump and the Patriots had more total yardage than the Eagles in SB52


30 posted on 11/11/2019 6:33:37 PM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Roy Spencer begs to differ: “Major Hurricanes Making US Landfall Down by 50% since the 1930’s” http://www.drroyspencer.com/2018/09/u-s-major-landfalling-hurricanes-down-50-since-the-1930s/

Reminds me of the hysteria right after Katrina about how that was only the beginning - the number of killer hurricanes was only going to get greater and greater. And then we went more than 10 years without a single Cat 3 or greater (that’s the official definition of a “major” hurricane) making landfall in the US.

These folks have no shame, and are held to no accountability.


31 posted on 11/11/2019 6:33:58 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s just stupifying that these “scientists” haven’t figured out that coastal areas are more developed than a century ago and that that things cost more now if relative value corrections aren’t made.


32 posted on 11/11/2019 6:37:22 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Correct link
http://americanskynews.com/articles-a.htm


33 posted on 11/11/2019 6:38:04 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

As someone else here said debunked by Joe Bastardi before the fact.

https://www.cfact.org/2019/06/24/hurricanes-have-always-been-bad-why-arent-they-worse/

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/joe-bastardi-hurricanes-happen-whether-they-are-politically-exploited-by-climate-change-activists-or-not


34 posted on 11/11/2019 6:40:44 PM PST by Ennis85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

Katrina did relatively little damage, as big hurricanes go. The problem was the levies failed, do to politicians taking money for maintenance and spending it on their pet projects. Same thing they do with road and bridge money.


35 posted on 11/11/2019 6:42:08 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Williams

One Texas island was completely destroyed by a hurricane in the 1800s. They don’t know what was there so can’t estimate the strength


36 posted on 11/11/2019 6:44:32 PM PST by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

we have a larger population than 100 years ago

100 more years of added infrastructure

half the populations live on the east and west coasts

no surprise


37 posted on 11/11/2019 6:45:10 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Worst. Acting. Ever.


38 posted on 11/11/2019 6:45:50 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

Sure you’re not thinking of Galveston 1900? Didn’t totally wipe it out but did virtuAlly destroy the town and they had to build it higher. Follow-up cane in 1915 was bad but their precautions made a big difference.


39 posted on 11/11/2019 6:57:30 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Total nonsense...


40 posted on 11/11/2019 6:58:35 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson