Skip to comments.
A Texas officer kills a woman while shooting at an unrestrained dog, police say
CNN ^
| Aug. 2, 2019
| Faith Karimi
Posted on 08/02/2019 8:41:44 AM PDT by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Innovative
Good shoot! Good shoot! (Just predicting the outcome of any investigation)
21
posted on
08/02/2019 8:57:25 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: DivineMomentsOfTruth
The article did not say that the dog was barking, it was just loose. Big deal.
“he noticed an unrestrained dog nearby”
To: Innovative
Because it charged at him.
23
posted on
08/02/2019 8:59:03 AM PDT
by
al_c
(Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
To: from occupied ga
24
posted on
08/02/2019 8:59:06 AM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: Innovative; Alaska Wolf; DCBryan1; Slings and Arrows; Doomonyou; napscoordinator; Shimmer1; ...
JBT Ping list
25
posted on
08/02/2019 8:59:14 AM PDT
by
null and void
(When the only tool you have is a hammer, ALL your problems look like skulls.)
To: Innovative
There are two places where idiots do not belong. In politics and police uniforms.
26
posted on
08/02/2019 8:59:48 AM PDT
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: MrEdd
“Sad, what law enforcement has degenerated into.”
That’s the money statement of this post.
To: Innovative
Not only did the cop shoot at the dog, he shot at it
multiple times. Spray and pray? Either this cop is pathologically afraid of dogs, or he just likes to shoot dogs.
Either way, Im sure an internal investigation will clear him of any wrongdoing.
Side note: Im told that many police departments have gotten rid of the old wooden nightstick. This is one instance where that weapon would have been the go-to device.
28
posted on
08/02/2019 9:02:09 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: bk1000
That sounds entirely possible. Long before we met, my wife had a dog that was very protective. She got really sick once, and the dog would not let anyone at all approach to help. Fortunately for me, she survived.
To: Innovative
30
posted on
08/02/2019 9:03:02 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: All; MrEdd
31
posted on
08/02/2019 9:03:13 AM PDT
by
DivineMomentsOfTruth
("There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." -GW)
To: Innovative
I guess he took care of her “welfare”. Seriously, what is it with shooting dogs? I guess I will reserve judgement to see the video and how much of a threat the dog really might have been, but it does not look good for the cop based on what’s presented here.
32
posted on
08/02/2019 9:03:35 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: Navy Patriot
"I only call the cops to "help" someone I want rid of.Hi! We're the Government and we're here to help you.
Your tax dollars at work.
33
posted on
08/02/2019 9:04:34 AM PDT
by
Desron13
(You may choose to ignore reality but you can't force reality to ignore you.)
To: DivineMomentsOfTruth
Sorry,
I didn’t read the article far enough. Initially it said he noticed a loose dog nearby.
Later it said that the dog was barking.
As others said on this thread, makes sense, that maybe the dog belonged to the woman and it was just trying to get her help.
The policeman could have talked to the dog, to calm him down first, at least, instead of getting his gun and shoot at it.
Wasn’t even a good shot, he shot the poor woman lying in the grass.
To: al_c
The article says “unrestrained” dog. It does NOT say...Charging, Barking or biting. The dog was just standing or sitting there........A case of officer target practice.
35
posted on
08/02/2019 9:07:34 AM PDT
by
davidb56
To: Innovative
36
posted on
08/02/2019 9:13:15 AM PDT
by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
To: All
Fire him he’s a trigger happy idiot.
37
posted on
08/02/2019 9:15:17 AM PDT
by
Retvet
(Retvet)
Larry Johnson, 20, has worked at this Walmart for 5 months. He would see the
couple under the tree and described the dog as looking like a small pit bull mixed
with another breed. He thinks the dog is a puppy.
38
posted on
08/02/2019 9:16:05 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Innovative
The U.S. Post Office should offer a welfare check service.
They are trained to deal with dogs without shooting them. They already hand deliver the literal welfare checks.
39
posted on
08/02/2019 9:16:45 AM PDT
by
Reeses
(A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
To: null and void
40
posted on
08/02/2019 9:18:48 AM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson