Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH LIVE: Robert Mueller testifies on his report, Trump and Russia
PBS ^

Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121

Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.

To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.

Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aaronzebley; adamschitt; alzheimers; bum; chrissteel; coulditbesatan; danielbush; declassification; defundnpr; defundpbs; dementia; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; fbi; fisa; heroratcliffe; hetakesthefifth; iknownuttink; impeachment; jamescomey; jimjordan; liarliar; lisapage; livemuellertestimony; lyingliar; mediawingofthednc; memoryloss; mikemelia; mueller; muellertestimony; npr; outsidemyperview; partisanmediashills; pbs; peterstrzok; politicaltheater; presstitutes; ratcliffe; robertmueller; senile; shtschultz; smearmachine; stalinistshill; trump; trumprussia; unamerican; weasel; williambrangham; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 1,921-1,936 next last
To: i_robot73
How do you NOT dig into Clinton, when she’s the one who was using 3rd parties to hit the dossier??

There is only one acceptable answer, and that is if there is an ongoing CRIMINAL investigation into the Clintons.

1,661 posted on 07/24/2019 11:54:09 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1648 | View Replies]

To: All

Yielding to Nunes. Good. Get ‘em Devin.


1,662 posted on 07/24/2019 11:55:15 AM PDT by Blogger (Vote Trump 2020 & get some of what you want. Don't & be guaranteed to get what you don't want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Two words for this pathetic display by Mueller: TOTAL TRAINWRECK!


1,663 posted on 07/24/2019 11:55:34 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
This is where the TWO secret scope modification memos from Rosenstein come into play. They’re still not public. What they say is likely to turn out to be extremely significant.

The reason Mueller didn't investigate Clinton, is hopefully because she is the subject of a criminal investigation. It would be the only plausible and acceptable answer.

1,664 posted on 07/24/2019 11:56:07 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1652 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Radical Left-wing Twitter is all in for the Democrats.

Celebrating Victories for the Trump indictments by that horrid Representative Ted Leui, (sp) CA, and Mueller himself!


1,665 posted on 07/24/2019 11:56:21 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1581 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

It’s clear that he’s refusing to answer any questions that ask him to back up statements he made in the report.


1,666 posted on 07/24/2019 11:57:22 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies]

To: Reily
However Dershowitz said something intriguing. He said that the USSC could weigh in and block the delivery of the bill of impeachment - declare it unconstitutional!. If it determined that there were no “high crimes & misdemeanors” broken in the bill.

First time I have ever heard that! I always thought & was taught that impeachment was solely in the hands of the Congress. House delivers voted on bill, Senate holds trial. No place for USSC other then CJ presides over trial.

What Dershowitz was alluding to is the equivalent of a motion to dismiss a lawsuit for failure to state a claim upon which the court can grant relief. In other words, Roberts as the presiding justice, can dismiss the articles of impeachment if, after accepting the allegations as true, they fail to allege "high crimes and misdemeanor" within the meaning of the constitution.

1,667 posted on 07/24/2019 11:57:58 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1340 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Nunes asking a bunch of questions Mueller won’t answer instead of just hammering away at his bias.


1,668 posted on 07/24/2019 11:58:23 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1662 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
She said he looks as if he had a few for lunch :)

He was lucid for about the first 20 minutes. He had some sort of boost over the lunch hour...

1,669 posted on 07/24/2019 11:59:17 AM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Mueller running out of gas. He just might end up face down on that table.


1,670 posted on 07/24/2019 11:59:37 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1666 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

However Dershowitz said something intriguing. He said that the USSC could weigh in and block the delivery of the bill of impeachment - declare it unconstitutional!. If it determined that there were no “high crimes & misdemeanors” broken in the bill.
First time I have ever heard that! I always thought & was taught that impeachment was solely in the hands of the Congress. House delivers voted on bill, Senate holds trial. No place for USSC other then CJ presides over trial.

What Dershowitz was alluding to is the equivalent of a motion to dismiss a lawsuit for failure to state a claim upon which the court can grant relief. In other words, Roberts as the presiding justice, can dismiss the articles of impeachment if, after accepting the allegations as true, they fail to allege “high crimes and misdemeanor” within the meaning of the constitution.


Needs repeating!


1,671 posted on 07/24/2019 11:59:50 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1667 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I believe Mueller has signs of early Alzheimers.


1,672 posted on 07/24/2019 11:59:52 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

One IS in his purview and the other not ‘cuz....reasons??

He was asked this and refused to answer.


1,673 posted on 07/24/2019 12:00:16 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1648 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Thanks for clarifying!


1,674 posted on 07/24/2019 12:00:31 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1667 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Nunes is unimpressive. comes across like an ass kisser


1,675 posted on 07/24/2019 12:00:37 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1668 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

He couldn’t come up with word ‘conspiracy’


1,676 posted on 07/24/2019 12:00:47 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1672 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

I believe Mueller has signs of early Alzheimers.


Seems to only manifest when answering questions posed by Republicans...


1,677 posted on 07/24/2019 12:01:07 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1672 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

There was a very long and intense article in Forbes describing the extreme detail of the examination of Trump company dealings in Russia to establish a new Moscow hotel. The efforts went on all during the time when they were trying to get him. All or most of the info in the article was extracted from the Mueller report. They throughly investigated the Trump business dealings with the Russians. There apparently was actual fire but not the criminal kind.

There are lots of names and dates and places. In the end, Cohen I believe said the reason it eventually fell through was because Donald Trump was elected President.

Cohen was also quoted as saying there was no ploitical collusion to influence the election but there was a lot of collusion to make money..... or words to that effect.

For reference, see the last issue of Forbes/Russia Trump Hotel

There has not been a single word about the extensive mueller reportes business investigation


1,678 posted on 07/24/2019 12:01:15 PM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1646 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Nunes is off today. He’s usually better than this. Not sure why.


1,679 posted on 07/24/2019 12:01:19 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1675 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

He is still lucid enough to always say “correct” if the person asking is a Dem.


1,680 posted on 07/24/2019 12:01:28 PM PDT by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1672 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 1,921-1,936 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson