Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.
To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.
Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.
Love it!
Oh no!
Hitler finds out!!!!!
And the Autists at _theDonald are going to shoot for the moon.
Bravo! to Mr Johnson
I want a refund and his time cards to prove he ever showed up to work just one day even if it was only to collect his paycheck.
It would be appropriate to subpoena Mueller and his staff’s calendars at this point.
Did we just fail clock management and leave too much time on the clock in the 4th quarter?
Ms. McBath doesn’t know we are a REPUBLIC, she thinks we are a democracy.
Nadler is extending the meeting so the Dems can continue, bogus. This charade was a charade, a sad one at that.
Axelrod tweet: “This is delicate to say, but Mueller, whom I deeply respect, has not publicly testified before Congress in at least six years. And he does not appear as sharp as he was then.”
Non Political decode: doddering fool, Dems made mistake...
Drudge’s headline is a pic of Mueller with a bold caption of:
DAZED AND CONFUSED
Nothing left but a series of stupid RATS. Guess we can all turn it off now.
What time does the later committee hearing begin?
I’m still hoping to see Mule-face drop dead before the end of all this.
There is no Senate version. The next step is the House Intel committee.
Actually, many times with the Democrats’ questions, he doesn’t appear to even be paying attention and merely repeats the response they give him - “correct”, “true”.
Where the heck does the DNC find these skanks? And we still don’t know who stole the strawberries.
Bob Mueller. He served in Vietnam you know. Smh
He doesn’t even know which president appointed him to office.
Then I say let’s let it run on this thread. I think the other, come to think of it, is Schiff’s committee.
Armstrong went after Weissman
Mueller gonna be mad
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Armstrong nailing Weissman. Mueller continues to refuse to “talk about that.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
imo, mueller showed his true colors in this exchange.
he had several opportunities to drop weissman in the grease, but instead he defended weissman as a competent prosecutor (in spite of arthur anderson) & weissman had “limited” involvement in staffing the special prosecuters office with dem donors hildabeast supporters.
he could have thrown weissman under the bus
Also he would not admit they friends only work colleagues.
—
Not true - he did ultimately say they were also friends.
I think he lied when Gohmert asked him if he had spoken to Comey in the 6 months prior to Comey’s firing and Mulehead answered no. Also he would not admit they friends only work colleagues.
Gohmert said “spoke to”. They probably didn’t communicate directly. The mob and spies use cut outs all the time. And of course look how Hillary Clinton used her law firm. No doubt Mueller was in communication with Comey through his law firm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.