Posted on 06/14/2019 11:12:37 AM PDT by Red Badger
Police can be sued for damages when their car chases lead to the death or injury of third parties, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled Thursday, overturning its own landmark 1952 decision that had granted blanket immunity to police after a crash.
In the case at hand, the high court allowed the children of Luis Gonzalez to return to Fayette Circuit Court and sue Scott County Sheriff Tony Hampton and Deputy Sheriff Jeremy Johnson for damages related to his death.
Gonzalez, 62, died in 2014 when a suspected drug dealer being chased by Johnson crashed head-on into his vehicle on Georgetown Road in Lexington. A litany of things went wrong with the pursuit, the court said, including wet, slippery roads; a restless police dog poking his head into the front of the car where Johnson sat, steering; and a broken siren on Johnsons car.
Gonzalezs passenger, 38-year-old Geneva Spencer, died months after the crash from her injuries.
The Gonzalez familys lawsuit was dismissed in circuit court because of the Supreme Courts 1952 ruling, in a case titled Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co., that police cannot be held liable for damages incurred during their pursuit of criminal suspects.
But the Supreme Court scrapped that precedent Thursday. In a 6-to-1 decision, the high court said Kentucky juries should get to decide if police were at fault, as they do in most other states.
Because of (Chambers), our trial courts and juries were precluded from ever finding that police officers were the cause of any damage suffered by a third party who is hit by a fleeing suspect. Today, 67 years post-Chambers, Kentucky finds itself in a nearly non-existent minority of states that have such a per se no proximate cause rule, Justice Debra Lambert of Somerset wrote for the majority.
The court noted that, from 1996 to 2015, an average of 355 people were killed annually in police pursuit-related crashes. During this period, the court wrote, roughly one-third of those killed were in a vehicle not involved in the pursuit or bystanders not in a vehicle.
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Laurance VanMeter of Lexington said the Kentucky General Assembly had seven decades to enact a law addressing the courts Chambers decision if legislators believed police should face liability for chase-related crashes. They did not pass such a law, he wrote.
Without a significant change in the language of a statute, long-standing public policy shielding law enforcement from liability should not be changed by the courts, VanMeter wrote.
The chase that killed Gonzalez started with an undercover drug operation the Scott County Sheriffs Office was running with the Kentucky State Police near Lisle Road in southern Scott County in January 2014.
A man named Gregory was meant to buy heroin from a suspected dealer while Johnson, the deputy, checked the dealers license plates from a hiding place, so police might learn the dealers identity, according to the Supreme Courts summary of the case. The dealer later was identified as 21-year-old Keenan McLaughlin of Lexington.
After the exchange, the Supreme Court wrote, Johnson witnessed McLaughlin run a red light and, without authorization, began to pursue him. The chase led the deputy and the suspect into Fayette County, where McLaughlin crashed into Gonzalez and Spencer. McLaughlin fled the crash scene on foot and was discovered by police soon thereafter at a house on East Second Street.
McLaughlin pleaded guilty in 2015 to two counts of manslaughter in exchange for 17 years in prison.
Meanwhile, in civil court, Gonzelez two grown sons filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Scott County sheriff and deputy.
The Gonzalez children pursued their claims despite the long-standing immunity held by police because that precedent was based on the state of the law in Kentucky in 1952, which was a very, very long time ago. As my partner said during oral arguments, this was from the horse and buggy era, said William Garmer, an attorney for the Gonzalez family.
Speaking for the Scott County Sheriffs Office, attorney Barry Stilz said: Were disappointed in the ruling. We disagree with it Stilz said he wanted to discuss Thursdays decision with his clients before he publicly comments on their next legal steps.
Stolen car pursuit decrease bump!
Can this headline be changed to make clearer that the KENTUCKY Supreme Court rules this?
What a mess! I see
1) Felonious behavior on the part of the perp
2) Extreme recklessness on the part of the police
3) Drugs
4) The war on drugs
5) Government that thinks it’s above the law.
I can’t..............
I believe this is already the law in most states.
We just had a similar case in Pensacola a few weeks back. 4 killed.
[[Kentucky police can be sued for chases that kill or injure, Supreme Court rules]]
Well gee, this won’t be exploited at all- dude in chase intentionally cuts himself before he gets pulled over- claims it happened because of the chase- now gets to sue the crap out of law enforcement- Cha-ching! Pay day! Get rich quick!
“Stolen car pursuit decrease bump!”
So just checking, do you equate the loss of an automobile with the loss of someone’s life? Seems to me to be a sensible decision. Innocent bystanders cannot be considered by the cops to be “collateral damage” in their “war on drugs!” Understand, I want drug dealers caught and punished, but not at the expense of someone else’s life! “No sorry about your wife Charlie, but we want you to know we caught the guy who was selling the marijuana in your neighborhood!”
——the high court said Kentucky juries should get to decide if police were at fault, ——
That is, there must be a trial and the jury must decide if the Sheriff is liable.
In this instance, it would seem that if it went to trial, the chased criminal was at fault. His vehicle killed the people in question.
In most states you have to show that the LEOs violated the pursuit policy to collect any damages.
I live in Kentucky. This means I can run from the cops all I want. But I need to ditch my license plate and get some Groucho glasses. :)
Ah...suppose the automobile contains an illegal alien who just killed someone. This is where I went having done this stuff, once upon a time.
How about if the police are chasing perps and they crash and kill someone, charge them with 1st degree murder. If they crash and injure someone, 20 years hard labor, if they crash and don’t kill or injure someone, 10 years at hard labor.
In the future, and sooner than we realize, the cops will be able to switch off you ignition via satellite....some can do that now....................
“Ah...suppose the automobile contains an illegal alien who just killed someone?”
I still have the same answer! It is unjust to kill an innocent bystander to apprehend even a murderer.
I think that is the law here in Florida. If you accidentally kill someone during the commission of a felony, life in prison.............
Yeah, that’s why I’m getting a directional EMP pulse generator installed on my back bumper. Amazon has them for $29.95 and they are getting great reviews. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.