Posted on 06/13/2019 6:44:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In a recent poll for “Axios on HBO,” 55% of American women say they would prefer to live in a socialist country over a capitalist country. This week on “Problematic Women,” we discuss why women are embracing socialism and what can be done to stop this trend.
Also, we break down why freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says members of Congress, despite already making $174,000 a year, deserve a pay raise.
We crown Yale University graduate and future Justice Brett Kavanaugh law clerk Sophia Chua-Rubenfeld Problematic Woman of the Week.
And we discuss these topics:
— Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surprisingly positive things to say about Kavanaugh’s first class of law clerks.
— Pro-life group Live Action was permanently banned from Pinterest this week for spreading “misinformation.”
— Mary Katharine Ham, CNN contributor and single mom of two, talks feminism, being a mother in the public eye, and much more.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...
We should withhold sex from them until they come crawling back to capitalism.
Womankind have been socially re-engineered. They as a voting bloc will destroy the nation.
Because they're dumb. And I can say that because I'm a woman. There's a hell of a lot of dumb broads out there, and they're getting dumber every day.
Not necessarily fake, but majorly misleading.
First off, what is the % on “men”?
Second, what is the demo break-down on the women?
55% is not statistically significant, ESPECIALLY if the norms of different demographics is thrown in. 12% of the pop voting 90% (that’s generous) commie is bound to skew otherwise balanced results. Even if not, 5% just is not seriously significant.
Oh really?
What fake about it? “Axios on HBO,” So HBO is a legit polling outfit?
WADR, you must not hang around here that much.
Anytime a woman thread pops up, get out your popcorn. There will be major sexism running rampant any way they can get it.
“Nest sitter”, by nature.
It is a drive for security.
I had a Robin build her nest on my power meter the last month .. bird was very protective ... when hatchlings appeared both bird parents fed them, but mom was MOST aggressive and agitated when I went in the backyard ...
Well, anything out of a website started by three former Polllutico staffers (Axios) I take to be fake from the get-go.
But the men here want to take the bait to bash women. It feeds their viewpoint so they run with it.
Emotions replacing any logic is the problem with women.
Well, maybe I don’t view those threads as much as others. I was raised to not view women as being universally susceptible to socialism, which is inspired by the god of this world. And my personal experience has taught me that there are very many conservative women, not in a minority in the US by far like Pollutico-spawned Axios claims.
But that goes against the logic here.
In fact females DO tend to be very aggressive and protective, especially mammals, because indeed it is up to them to raise and protect theirs. Female dogs are better “guards” while males are better “patrols”, they will use their aggression anytime whereas females need a reason - “theirs”/possession - and then it is passionate.
If they are naturally more protective...why would they desire more outward security from someone else?
Oh yeah, because men never have emotions. Oh wait, it’s said they are more aggressive. Isn’t that from anger? Isn’t anger an emotion?
That should not be considered a given principle for all time. We have only had attempts at universal sufferance for the last 100 years or so.
I am not convinced that it has worked very well. We should consider alternatives.
Feel free to add appropriate categories to the exclusion or inclusion list.
Indeed, but please re-read my 44 again. Certain demographics have HUGE majorities for commies, yet that is not considered when looking at the minor majority of “women”.
All of these races have significant majorities voting Dem, yet “women” are piled on for a tiny tipping % making them technically majority Dem, never mind the race demos in there.
In MD yeah, I figure I’m surrounded by Dems, though I am a native unlike many of my neighbors. No matter what sex I’m going to be fighting Dems here. And I know most will assume I’m Dem because I’m in central MD, and a woman. But they’d be wrong, very wrong.
Women have the emotional need to be taken care of, it is part of who they are. Since the feminist attitude is to reject any and all males, then the only other option is the government. Just sayin.....
Sounds like the Radar O’Reilly approach of “beating her to the ignore.” Didn’t work for him either.
On average, they’d rather live off of someone than produce.
Cause women are mostly stupid politically. They don’t know real history
They are very smart people wise. But overly simplistic and non logical
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.