Posted on 05/26/2019 1:55:11 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
The FBI tried to destroy the reputation of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr as controversial unearthed files reveal. Shocking details of the FBI’s smear campaign against MLK Jr have been found on secret tapes, it is claimed. Its is alleged the agency accused the celebrated civil-rights campaigner of having up to 40 affairs.
~[snip} J Edgar Hoover, who believed he had Communist Party ties. Details of the covert tapes have been revealed by biographer David Garrow, ...
MLks secret heartache and the white woman he could never marry.... Hoover feared [King's] popular movement could destabilise the country.
Agents honed in on King’s philandering and claims he fathered a child – claims which Garrow argues could lead to “painful historical reckoning”. Although the tapes, recorded by bugs in two lamps in hotel rooms booked by King in January, 1964, are ... at the US National Archives, the author unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents.
He claims they show King had extramarital affairs with up to 45 women and, shockingly, even “looked on and laughed” as pastor friend Logan Kearse raped a parishioner. The recording from the Willard Hotel, near the White House, shows how King was accompanied by Kearse, (died 1991), along with female parishioners of his church. In his hotel room, the files claim, they then “discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts”.
... “when one of the women protested that she did not approve, the Baptist minister immediately and forcefully raped her” as King watched. He is alleged to have “looked on, laughed and offered advice” during the attack. FBI agents were in the room next door, but did not intervene.
(continued below)
(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...
So how will the Ministry of Truth (aka the Mainstream News Media) “spin” this into propaganda?
Does this mean that we’ll go back to celebrating both Washington’s and Lincoln’s birthdays?
The so-called “journalists” of the Ministry of Propaganda are now awaiting their “talking points.” The Ministry of Truth will tell them exactly how to “report” this. They’ll all say exactly the same thing.
Statues taken down when?
If those tapes existed, they would have been used to destroy him.
Really, So the logic that follows is that The FBI spies on everyone forever, so just get used to it ?
At least they didn’t spy in Trump’s hotel bedroom, and that’s because TRUMP owns the hotels, so they couldn’t.
They would if they could. Spymen gonna Spy.
Funny how the grossly indiscreet Gov. Clinton prowled on numerous women and no one ever saw or heard a damn thing. Nor did they bother to ‘bug’ him or ‘spy’ on him to protect national interest or whatever they claim to protect.
I think this is a baloney sandwich.
Hoover hated King, and would have loved to destroy him.
If such tapes existed, they would have been used in some concrete way against King. Hoover’s FBI regularly engaged in illegal wiretapping and bugging — and then used information gained from such activities against those Hoover considered dangerous.
From Ralph Abernathy’s book. He and MLK spent the night with 2 white hookers in their hotel room the night before he was shot.
Agreed.
Yes, Our delightful POTUS will correct the calendar and we will once again celebrate our great Fore-Father’s birthday on February 22!!!
2. And His B-day on June 14!
3. He’s going to Keep America Great and get his name on the $50 bill.
I often wonder what MLK would think of Sharpton, Jackson, and their ilk.
MLK Day: Why I won’t be celebrating
by Frank Of Queens
Now that MLK day is upon us, we will be inundated with a plethora of testimonies as to his greatness. In fact there is now the unspoken eleventh commandment:”Thou shalt not criticize Martin Luther King!”
He has taken on deity status. No one dares to look critically at his politics or life. Instead many believe that he is the most perfect being that ever existed. Yes, it’s true! Why you can smear the Founding Fathers, you can even put Our Lord Jesus in a vat of urine upside down and call it art. But heaven forbid that you should say a bad word about MLK. King was a public figure, and now an historical one. Therefore he should be open to examination of his beliefs and politics. There exists though the belief that if you should begin to question and examine them that somehow that makes you a “racist”. Tell me, if you raise historical inquiry about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Adams, etc. does that make you a traitor, or subversive? Of course not! Why in today’s Orwellian America, they are just reduced to slave holders and “old dead White guys”. I have heard them referred to as “the founding robbers”. Jefferson is reduced to a calumny that he was just a randy country squire who had sex with his slave. Jesus, why you can deconstruct His life, and it is not offending to Christians we are told, it is just historical inquiry. The same with the Founding Fathers, or for that matter any other figure in our society. Yet, when it comes to King, there is no deconstruction, nor is there real inquiry, or debate. We are just given some clips of speeches that create this image of a non-violent Ghandi figure who out Jesus’, Jesus!
King is depicted as the martyr for the sins of White America, sacrificed upon the altar of America’s hatred and bigotry. Because of the senseless crime of killing him, all White people are guilty by birth. It is a religion, and all White people are guilty of the original sin of racism. Affirmative action became a form of penance. Generations unborn must
pay the price for this act of collective sin. Just as Jews were held responsible for the death of Jesus as a group, so all Whites are guilty of this act of murder. It has even spawned a new form of penance, reparations. Drawn up into King’s murder is the U.S.government. J.Edgar Hoover is blamed for this. But why did Hoover have such antipathy towards King? Simply because Hoover who wasn’t against the Civil Rights movement, saw rightfully, that communists were infiltrating the movement and would as they have always done, subvert it. It is fact, not his paranoia that confirms this. Whether it was Spain during the Spanish Civil war, Cuba under Battista, the left has always used the popular front and noble causes to gain power, and then get rid of any opposition. King had known communists in his movement. Which brings me to my main question.
If King was for civil rights, then why did this man who proclaimed that he was for non-violence employ in his movement people whose philosophy suppressed liberty, and was the most violent movement in history? King knew that he had communists in his movement, yet he never got rid of them. He said he didn’t care if they were communists, as long as they helped him achieve his goals. Well then, is this the statement of some who believed in civil rights? Someone who is ignorant, or someone who himself believed in their ideology? Didn’t he know what was happening in Russia to Soviet Jews who were being deprived of their civil and religious rights. Jews who were imprisoned for wanting to go to Israel? Deprived of the right to practice their faith? Or how about Eastern Europe, where Christians were tortured, murdered and suppressed for their love of Christ? Didn’t he know about the millions who died under the Communists in Russia and Europe? How about China under Mao, the worst mass murderer in history? You mean this Reverend didn’t know this? This individual who said that the undeveloped nations looked to communism, not America, didn’t know about the repression, murder, and brutality of that system? Instead he excoriated America, our foreign policy, and our economic system. He compared it to Nazi Germany, and yet he didn’t know what the communists were doing and had done since Lenin’s coup in 1917? If some had Nazis in their political movement in America, do you think that it would be tolerated, given what they had done? Yet King saw nothing wrong with having people whose ideology cause the greatest suffering in history? He defamed the heroes of WW2 by comparing this nation to Nazi Germany. If it was like Nazi Germany, do you think there would have been a voting rights act of 1965? Do you think that there would have been any civil rights movement to begin with? King was critical of our economic system. He wanted to redistribute the wealth, and install a guaranteed national income. Didn’t he see how people lived under the “wonders of Marxist Leninist” economics”? This criticism coming from someone who never held a job, never ran a business, and had no experience whatsoever in the field of commerce! How can I honor a man whose whole life was spent on defending America’s enemies? As for the calumny that J.Edgar Hoover was somehow behind his death, let’s use some commonsense. Would he want to create a martyr out of a man whose political star was waning? If Hoover was this racist, as depicted by the left, then why did he break the KKK? Hoover loved his country, and sought to protect it from elements that were harmful to the common good. Given the record of communism at that time, should he have been tolerant of an intolerant ideology? He had asked King to get rid of the communists in his movement, King refused. Hoover rightly felt that he had to move to protect this nation from those who would use the civil rights movement to subvert and harm our nation. Instead of congratulations, he is smeared with lies and calumnies! King was against racism, yet he embraced an ideology that that was intolerant of those who disagreed politically. He was a reverend, yet he stood by those whose ideology punished those who wanted practice their religion! He accused America of being the number one perpetrator of war crimes in S.E.Asia, yet said nothing about what the communists were doing not only there, but also all over the world. If the one thing that history teaches us, it is that thirty years is far too short to make judgements on a public or political individual. The rush to deify King was a mistake, and those who question it are always attacked.
For this among other reasons, I won’t be celebrating MLK Day.
http://trpshowpodcasts.blogspot.com/2018/06/trp-61518.html
maybe it wasn’t “rape” rape, better let the liberal thought police translate this for us...
They did send a letter to get him to try to commit suicide.
The tapes are sealed by Court order.
FBI released the notes about the tapes.
It’s all very curious.
Clinton did try to pass a bill to have the tapes released.
I think the info is probably true about the affairs.
Probably true about the orgy.
Unsure about the rape
The tapes do, in fact, exist. Content is up for debate.
Sealed by Court Order.
Unsealed in 2027.
2. King worked himself to the point of illness and total exhaustion to support the causes he believed in.
Well if true the King is screwed, for screwing and rape as a rap to the charge sheet.
So will they be taking down all this MKL Road Signs in every city nation wide?
Dems no longer are trying to pass a law to unseal the tapes.
I think they know it will not look good.
I hope I live long enough to see them unsealed but it will probably go like JFK files.
Please remember exactly what Whoopie thought wasn’t “rape rape.”
DRUGGING A 13 YEAR OLD WITH QUAALUDES AND PENETRATING THREE OF HER ORIFICES
So what is rape-rape at all, according to the Whoop-Scale, when you murder her afterward and leave her body on the side of the freeway?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.