-—the failure of bureaucracy—
Shouldn’t the question be....did the 34,000 pack up and leave?
Concern trolls have no idea.
Eliminate Chicago and Illinois will eliminate 99.99999999999% of ALL of their problems.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Di Rosa Parks need a license to sit at the front if the bus?
so the criminal types and the people with “mental issues” aren’t turning in their guns voluntarily?
no kiddin
Consider the problem. 34,000 gun owners who went to the trouble to get a gun legally in Illinois. If you’re willing to go to through the process that implies that A. you have a need to have a gun and B. your not giving it up just because the state legislature says so, or there’s a knock at the door to actually collect it. A significant percentage are going to say that the gun was lost or stolen. A very small percent may open fire. Either way it’s a fool’s errand for law enforcement to go round knocking on doors.
Yeah, well, the *deemed too dangerous to have one* can be a pretty subjective criteria.
Unless one has a history of gun related crimes or known to have a sadistic streak and tortures animals, etc, then I don't trust the gun grabbing government's judgment of who is or is not *too dangerous* to have one.
Especially in light of red flag laws.
How many people who never bothered to get a permission card in the first place have guns anyway?
4 people to write this? Must be a record.
For those of you who don’t know, in Illinois, one must get permission from the state government to exercise one’s 2nd Amendment rights. Before one can legally own or purchase a firearm one must first obtain a Firearms Owner’s Identification (FOID) card. The irony is, that as a Missouri resident, I don’t have to produce a FOID card to purchase ammunition or a long gun, but an Illinois resident does.
Good. Remember that, politicians!
They want to take guns from honest, non-violent citizens and deliberately and intentionally leave them in the hands of violent criminals, so they can waltz right in and take what is ‘rightfully’ theirs from their ‘oppressors’.
LOL .send the judges and politicians to these homes to take the guns from crazy people. It’s easy to write a law and then expect someone else to enforce it.
See how that works out for yer....
See how that works out for yer....
What’s the “pubic safety risk”?
The paperwork?
............WHAT-ever.............................
CLEARLY, ya don’t have THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND raging criminals (amongst once-legal gunowners) now raging, robbing and murdering against the honest citizens,
So what’s REALLY going on, here?
Well notify them they’re REALLY, REALLY, REALLY in for it if they don’t. And, who made the decision these peons are TOO dangerous? Guess I missed that clause in the 2nd amendment.