[rktman]

Hey, shouldn't that fall under the fraud, waste, abuse category? And surely nobody will use the resutling fluffed up data to advocate or promote gun control. Right? So, I didn't look far enough to see who's doing it. Johns Hopkins docs against glocks study group?

[Red Badger]

I’ve never seen a violent gun...................ever.................

[Sacajaweau]

CDC needs some revisions. They do this cr**, traffic studies...things where the end product means absolutely nothing except create a stat.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Blah. Blah. Blah. And FISH want to BAN Fishing Poles, LOL!

These jerks can do whatever they want. We legal gun owners are not going to bow one INCH to them.

[Professional]

Well, there’s 50m down the toilet, narrative driven gobblity gook...

[WKUHilltopper]

This is BS.

[Bayan]

They’ll spend 50 million but there’s no doubt they could write their report with all their conclusions tomorrow.

[The Toll]

50 million of our money for Democrats to play anti-NRA with.

[joethedrummer]

I’ll study it for half that price!!

[BitWielder1]

If they don't study Chicago, then what's the point?

[rellimpank]

—all they need to do is take a look at the FBI crime report and the pie chart about halfway down on this link to see all there is to know about “gun violence”-—

https://heyjackass.com/

[chris37]

Maybe they should study gun gender dysphoria while they’re at it.

[mumblypeg]

Hasn’t the CDC already done at least 1 (or 2 or 3) of these studies?
Hasn’t it already been determined that the “guns =violence=bad” stats are skewed by suicides & self defense?

[Old Retired Army Guy]

Hopefully that is dead on arrival in the Senate.

[I want the USA back]

Guns are not violent. Guns are a tool. People can be violent. They should study why some people are violent. The answer is 60 years of liberal policies.

[nuconvert]

Yeah, there’s money well spent......N O T !

[joma89]

I trust this dies in conference with the Senate.

JoMa

[fruser1]

Another 50 mil to my friends.

[imardmd1]

The studies have already been done, and they indicate that LESS gun restrictions to the law-abiding citizen is indicated, and as well as greater penalties for use of guns to commit crimes need to be enforced. Dropping gun charges as a bargaining chip to get voluntary convictions should be barred, across the board.

Citizens armed with guns to defend themselves prevents more violent crime and saves more lives than the police do, a known statistical fact.

[Jack Hammer]

How much has been earmarked for the study of Idiot Violence and lawlessness due to gormless democrat party social policies?

[sergeantdave]

When you weenie bitches are done with your gun study, hammer it to a tree at 500-yards and we’ll see how often we can hit it. BTW, consider that an answer to your irritating whine to turn in our battle rifles, wimps.