Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Once again, POTUS speaks the words of common sense that the world has been ignoring - can I love this man any more than I already do???

For at least a decade I have RAILED against every unnecessary change in software systems (Windows, etc, etc) that makes upgrading (say from Win 7 to Win 10) an unecessary nightmare.

Twenty and third-something software enginees, with little life experience, are continually seeking to "one up one another" and making computer systems more and more complex. Its a minor annoyance when you have to re-learn how to run all of your PC programs - its something far, far, worse when something like the air speed/stall indicator software systems glitch, override the pilots and force the plane to fly into the ground.

G-D to he** the software "newer is always better" geeks!!!!!!!!!!!!

There. I needed to get that off my chest. Its something that has been obvious for a long, long time, BUT NO ONE TALKS ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!

1 posted on 03/12/2019 12:52:10 PM PDT by Simon Foxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Simon Foxx

Waiting until the cause of the crash is known before speaking would be a good idea.


2 posted on 03/12/2019 12:53:41 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Right. Rue the day they invented the dial telephone.


3 posted on 03/12/2019 12:54:01 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx
I don’t know about you, but I don’t want Albert Einstein to be my pilot. I want great flying professionals that are allowed to easily and quickly take control of a plane!

LMAO.

I'm assuming Trump knows a lot more about this Boeing situation than what is being reported in the news media.

4 posted on 03/12/2019 12:54:29 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Heh. was just overflown by a USMC V-22 Osprey.

The very definition of complexity ...


7 posted on 03/12/2019 12:57:25 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx; All


Less Than $973 To Go!!
Your Monthly and Quarterly
Donations Add Up To Help
Make The Miracle Of FR Happen!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


9 posted on 03/12/2019 12:57:50 PM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Amen Mr President.


10 posted on 03/12/2019 12:58:31 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Whow as a physicist, former submariner, involved in advanced technology all of my life, Trump drove this nail in with one hammer blow.

The behavior of complex systems is not predicated by an analysis of each step in a process because it is all too complex for such an analysis. I have seen project after project go disastersouly awry because of this.

And of course we all see this in software that started as a simple workable program (now called an app) that is in an endless do-loop of patches and upgrades because some kid decided to add one more really awesome feature.


13 posted on 03/12/2019 12:59:15 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Public washrooms: we used to have simple sink taps that you could open with a handle.

Now you’ve got some high-tech gizmo that’s supposed to detect your hands waving around and automatically turn on the water ... but half the time it doesn’t work

What was wrong with simple taps?


14 posted on 03/12/2019 1:05:57 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

We don’t have the people or the skill sets to run without more automation.

Or rather, the wages needed to have those people do those jobs are above what the industry (any industry) can support.

So we are headed to the coffin corner where the skill sets needed to make and design products cost more than they can be sold for, because we have cut margins so much.

And before you say” then pay more”, that will mean massive inflation and the cost of goods rising to the point many can’t afford them.

I deal with automation every day. There will be a crash, and soon, as we have automated so much experience out of the workforce that it will not be able to be replaced.

To put it another way, Rome’s aqueducts were built so well that everyone who knew how to do it died out without teaching the next generation how. A few hundred years later, they were viewed as magic and impossible to recreate.

An associate of mine predicts that our grandchildren will be in the dusk of a dark age. He also works on automation.


17 posted on 03/12/2019 1:08:03 PM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I think he is correct. The K.I.S.S. principle (keep it simple stupid) first mentioned I believe by Skunkworks’ Kelly Johnson. Make something as simple as possible, but not simpler. Less to break. Less to go wrong. Very good engineering principle.


18 posted on 03/12/2019 1:08:43 PM PDT by wattsgnu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

It’s not just airplanes. Automobiles have so many overpriced features on them that new cars cost twice as much as my first home and people are financing them for 6-10 years and many can’t afford to repair them.


19 posted on 03/12/2019 1:08:54 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

They have to justify their jobs, make something new, complicated.

From someone who is supposed to know.....

Apparently an erroneous Angle of Attack sensor causes the computer to think the angle is too steep and starts dialing in down trim. The pilot tries to compensate but safeties in the software refuse to let him. The plane porpoises up down up down then down. (pundit on TV said that also yesterday)
This is happening in ‘manual’ control, not auto-pilot.
All controls are computer driven, even ‘manual’ control. Fly-by-Wire.

There is a workaround IF the pilot is trained to use it. Flipping some switches.


24 posted on 03/12/2019 1:14:21 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I tried to change the bulb in my 2016 Ford Fusion Headlight and found it had been over engineered, so that I have to take the front bumper off to get to the lights....


25 posted on 03/12/2019 1:14:23 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

“Everything should be made as simple as possible. But no simpler.”...................Albert Einstein...............


26 posted on 03/12/2019 1:14:42 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Absolutely right !

Only a fool would value complexity for its own sake.

It is difficult enough to properly test the simplest system, even if you are testing incremental changes to an existing system.

Complex and completely new systems with massive complications are really untestable. You learn their failure modes the hard way.

Unfortunately there is an engineering/tech mentality that a “better” product has to to be cool, and new, and complex, and woke, and modern and hi-tech and progressive, and disruptive, and transformative... rather than simple and reliable and durable and robust.

They are designing to impress other techies and prove they are the world’s “greatest” engineers.

Instead they prove the exact opposite. And it has infected every product, software hardware, cars, airplanes, bridges buildings...

The simple stuff is much less likely to catastrophically fail. And when it does you can easily turn it off. Contrast that with, for example, a Lexus with a malfunctioning drive by wire, that the driver couldn’t figure out the engine turn off sequence under stress, because it didn’t have a key.


29 posted on 03/12/2019 1:18:55 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (TAX the WOKE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I presume then that Mr. Trump is not a fan of autonomous self-driving vehicles.


30 posted on 03/12/2019 1:19:40 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Well said.

Old software engineer. 30+ years

These new kids are so eager to Put their Stamp of ownership no matter the cost on new designs.

Keep It Simple Stupid still works today.


33 posted on 03/12/2019 1:25:52 PM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

I am a software geek and I am ALWAYS arguing that simpler is better.

I usually get things done in half the time as all the rest of the people who think they such brilliant software gurus...

And my code works (on the first try is always my goal) and you can read it.


37 posted on 03/12/2019 1:34:36 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

For about fifteen years now airlines have had flights on total autopilot while pilots sit there soiling there shorts. Now the roads are to be inundated with self-driving trucks putting about a million people out of work. If we don’t keep an eye on it “Terminator” SkyNet WILL happen and we won’t have a damn thing to save us. It’s not the plane, it’s the artificial intelligence.


38 posted on 03/12/2019 1:34:41 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (NRT, New Rome Tacitus, just don't call me late to dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Simon Foxx

Ditto automobiles.


41 posted on 03/12/2019 1:43:55 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson