Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force updates 'deploy or get out' policy; 1,000 airmen could face separation
Stars and Stripes ^ | 2/19/19 | Corey Dickstein

Posted on 02/20/2019 10:25:46 AM PST by jeannineinsd

All U.S. Air Force airmen who have had non-deployable status for more than a year will soon face a disability board or be considered for administrative separation as part of the service’s implementation of the Pentagon’s so-called “deploy or get out” policy.

A directive signed Tuesday by Air Force senior leaders states the service seeks to achieve a 95 percent or higher deployable rate within its units. The directive follows the October order by then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis for the Pentagon’s military services to create guidelines meant to motivate servicemembers to retain their ability to deploy into combat after troops in non-deployable status ballooned to more than 11 percent in recent years.

“We expect all airmen to exercise personal accountability for their deployable status and to take the necessary steps to maintain their readiness,” stated the memo, which was signed by Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth Wright. “…The defense of our nation requires airmen and the Air Force be ready to deploy at all times.”

(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; deploy; separation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Any comment from freepers on this?
1 posted on 02/20/2019 10:25:46 AM PST by jeannineinsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Its about danged time!
WHen Desert Storm first kicked off, you wouldnt believe the number of PAID military folks that wimped out for one reason or another. Made me sick!


2 posted on 02/20/2019 10:30:15 AM PST by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

What are the reasons for non-deployment?.................


3 posted on 02/20/2019 10:31:14 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd
The recent incident in which two Air Force members were non-deployable due to being HIV positive and subsequently kicked out — only to have a judge issue an injunction against their removal — will play into this how?

It seems outrageous that a judge would decide to countermand a military command decision of any kind.

4 posted on 02/20/2019 10:31:20 AM PST by TheDandyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

1,000 is a rounding error to the approximately 350,000 active duty airmen.

However, nearly 100% that are trans-something are nondeployable.


5 posted on 02/20/2019 10:33:37 AM PST by 2banana (Were you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

SOP.
In 1991, I was assigned to process V Corps Artillery non-deployables. A lot of them were single soldiers without a workable Dependent Care Plan. They couldn’t go to war because there was no one to look after their kids. Out they went, and rightly so.

Then there were the fatties and the chronically profiled soldiers.

It was a good opportunity for The Army to clean house.


6 posted on 02/20/2019 10:39:37 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Sister was an AF logistics Major. Adult onset allergies made her non deployable. She was medically discharged.

All medical and mental conditions which prevent deployment - long term - should be processed out. I do not count pregnancy as long term. However, child care IS long term and if it is incompatible with the job, should be processed out.


7 posted on 02/20/2019 10:40:09 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
What are the reasons for non-deployment?.............

From the article:

"The Air Force directive listed four requirements for its airmen to remain in deployable status:

Meet individual medical readiness standards, to include medical, dental and physical components.
Be able to execute the wartime mission requirements of their respective career fields, to include technical, educational and physical proficiency.
Be current on the Air Force Fitness Assessment.
Be considered a satisfactory participant in Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard duties, if applicable."

8 posted on 02/20/2019 10:40:26 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Medical reasons.
Family reasons.
Legal reasons.


9 posted on 02/20/2019 10:40:32 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MagUSNRET

I tried to get back in during Desert Storm but because of medical, was not accepted.


10 posted on 02/20/2019 10:41:05 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

That just tells me what it takes to be deployable.

What are the reasons for people to claim non-deployment status? Religion? Family matters? Other than health concerns.................


11 posted on 02/20/2019 10:43:10 AM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheDandyMan
It seems outrageous that a judge would decide to countermand a military command decision of any kind.

Agree 100%

12 posted on 02/20/2019 10:44:33 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

I didn’t know it was a choice? Back in the day (60’s) you either went with your unit or were in the hospital or you went to the cooler.


13 posted on 02/20/2019 10:45:18 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MagUSNRET
Yeah, if they're just wimping out, get them out! Good call by the Air Force. Never understood it myself. When I was in the Army I ALWAYS looked forward to a new assignment. Didn't happen that often because I was only in uniform three years.

But for crying out loud, if it isn't a war zone, it's not going to be THAT bad! And if it is a war zone, there is that thing called DUTY. What are you doing in the service if you're not there to do your duty? Slackers definitely aren't needed in the military!

14 posted on 02/20/2019 10:45:24 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

There are people in the service who attemp to make a career out of not deploying. They maintain their “deployable” status right up until the point their unit has to deploy, then they suddenly have an issue. Then they spend time on limited duty, only to move on and infect another unit. The number of females who get pregnant right before a deployment is amazing. When that person has an MOS/NEC/AFSC that is mission critical, the entire unit suffers, and the leadership is left scrambling to find a “volunteer” to deploy on short notice.


15 posted on 02/20/2019 10:47:06 AM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd
Well, hallelujah. It's about time. The military was never meant to be simply a means to a steady paycheck with three hots and a cot. Too many snowflakes and sissy-la-las mucking up the ranks. Shake 'em out and harden up the good ones. The same goes for all the other military branches.

If you cannot abide the idea that our military's foremost mission is to go out, break stuff, and harm those who threaten our nation, then get out.

As my Drill Sergeant so eloquently put it: "If you can't hang, you shouldn't-a came."

16 posted on 02/20/2019 10:48:41 AM PST by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

Hard to have an “air” force, if they won’t leave the ground!


17 posted on 02/20/2019 10:51:29 AM PST by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDandyMan

Ah, judges running the military, perfect


18 posted on 02/20/2019 10:54:11 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd

"DEPLOYABLES!"


19 posted on 02/20/2019 10:54:37 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Every time a lefty cries "racism", a Trump voter gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeannineinsd
There are no acceptable excuses for long-term nondeployable status. Those who miss deployment due to a short-term issue should deploy (with another unit, even if that is awkward) within 6 months when that issue is cleared up. Those who cannot or will not deploy within six months should be processed out (perhaps rare exceptions could get a waiver from the service chief). People who don't want to do their job have other government options perfectly suited for those who don't want to work. This is the military not the Department of Motor Vehicles.


20 posted on 02/20/2019 10:57:04 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson