Posted on 02/20/2019 5:00:15 AM PST by Moseley
Advocates of a hypothesis that there is global warming that humans are causing ridicule those who wont join their club. Yet the problem is that our schools have spread lack of understanding throughout our once-great society. Every institution run by people has been diminished. So let this be a primer if readers want to understand the hypothesis of global warming or try to free a believer from their fever:
I. Failing Freshman Statistics
The vast majority of the Earth is not being measured by weather stations. As we try to compare temperatures earlier in time, the poor coverage grows radically worse the farther back in time we go toward 1880.
The Earths surface measures 196.9 million square miles. Today, there are an estimated 10,100 weather stations world-wide, in addition to 1,000 free-floating buoys completely useless for measuring climate change.
Trending: Nathan Phillips Pushes Conservative Journalist, Runs Away When Confronted Over Covington Students
That means that if the temperature measurements were spread evenly across the Earths surface (they arent), there would be 1 weather station for every 19,495 square miles of the Earths surface. Thats almost the size of the State of Maryland (12,407 square miles).
Can todays pseudo-scientists measure trends in the planets temperature? No. Heres why:
First, the vast majority of the Earths surface is not being measured.
Second, a statistically valid sample, must be a random sample. You must take 196.9 million temperature measurements and average 196.9 million temperature measurements to come up with a single global average.
We can only resort to a smaller sample if the sample is random. But it is not. Any first-year student in undergraduate science would get an F if he tried to use a non-random sample to extrapolate the Earths overall global temperature.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
Again, I smell a great future in lots of research grants.
how do you calibrate tree rings as an instrument of precise scientific measurement?
Calibration is done with rainfall records in the area of interest.
how do you standardize it as an instrument of measure?
Only useful if you have recent rainfall records in the area studied.
what is the margin of error in tree ring measurements? isnt the margin of error or range of imprecision far greater than the effects we are trying to calculate?
See my earlier reply that discusses limitations of the methodology.
But this is the fatal flaw.
No one wants to remember that we are talking about GASES which MOVE and circulate.
So even if CO2 molecules are heavier than other atmospheric gases, the turbulence of the atmosphere exceeds the difference in mass.
Otherwise, if CO2 settled out as a layer near the Earth’s surface, all animal life including people would suffocate with only CO2 to breathe.
We ARE CARBON!
The first reliable thermometers were invented over 300 years ago in 1714 by Daniel Fahrenheit.
i REMEMBER THE OLD “GREENHOUSE EFFECT” from the 1950s and 1960s.
I also remember the 1980s when POPULAR SCIENCE MAGAZINE editorialized they would no longer use the term “Greenhouse Effect” as it was not true.
Ten years later they were hollering about “glo-bull warming”.
The “people” who spout this global warming nonsense have a motto. “If you can’t silence opponents with science, then restrict them with ridicule.”
CO2 is plant food, read botany 101! FOOL!
CO2 concentration is a lagging indicator of temperature change.
The largest sequestration of CO2 are the oceans (2/3rds of the surface). CO2 is sequestered in higher concentrations during cold periods and released in warmer periods.
Ice cores are not precise indicators of global CO2 concentrations because their sequestration rate is higher in the cold periods (freezing temps).
A green house does not work by preventing radiation per se, it works because it physically prevents convection
The problem is intentional “dumbing down” of PUBLIC education has been going on for several generations and so ignorance of basic science, history, and all other useful subjects is a case of the teacher pupil relationship becoming the blind leading the blind. I suggested to my daughter that one of her AGW devoted teachers and I have a simple and civil discussion in front of a class, but she feared the consequences to my blood pressure and her grade and didn’t take up the offer.
Climate alarmists ignore these established facts.
Not carbon, but carbon di-oxide. The other choice was hydrogen di-oxide (water).
ML/NJ
I think you've got that backwards ... there are two hydrogen atoms to one oxygen ...
Dihydrogen monoxide.
Ever wonder why there is a tree line on mountains, above which there are no trees? Its not temperature related.
The only source for planet wide oxygen is CO2. We only have 1% to spare and we have more people every year. We need more CO2 so we can have more O2. A bonus would be higher crop yields. More food for more people.
Okay. Sounds reasonable to me. I truly hope you are working on getting grant funding to research this. You and your family could live like kings for decades.
I think you are correct. (How stupid of moi!)
ML/NJ
Under the category of: Opinion.
If it’s fact, it’s not opinion. Needs to be categorized differently.
* * *
Every living thing is made of carbon. Carbon is the ultimate building block. And I think that carbon dioxide is an integral part of the NATURAL breathing, exhaling, plant respiration cycle. Regardless, the left promotes fake science.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.