Posted on 02/08/2019 8:06:16 AM PST by fishtank
Is the male reproductive system poorly designed?
by Jerry Bergman
One of the latest proofs of human evolution is the poor design claim, namely that an intelligent Creator would not design some human body part in a certain way. An example is the human male reproductive system, which Rowe listed as number four in his list of the top 10 design flaws in the human body.1 The human male reproductive system poor design claim focuses on the view that if testicles were designed, then why didnt God protect them better. Couldnt the Designer have put them inside the body, or encased them in bone like the brain which is surrounded by a hard skull?2
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
"Concluding that a body structure is poorly designed,
as Oxford University Ph.D. Professor Hafer claims,
Hafer explained that when she was looking for new approaches to refute Intelligent Design,
she knew she had a winner when in the middle of an Anatomy and Physiology lecture.
she concluded that the male reproduction system is a great first argument against ID. 3
She believed that she also had a good political-style argument against ID."
After watching my father’s battle with prostate cancer I’d have to say yes.
The sharing of urinary and reproductive functions was a very bad design flaw IMHO. The ability to pee is pretty important.
Here's a reminder to those who DON'T bother to read articles before posting....
God is most definitely a woman.
No man would have placed the testicles outside in the open.
I can’t argue with her, after all He made her so...
Cancer and the Fall has great potential to screw up a great design.
Did you read the article????
Yeah, it requires a female mating assembly.
“If you bought your body at Sears, you’d take it back.” - Gallagher
IF she is so intelligent then she can start with clay, shape her ideal man and breathe life into him and claim some notoriety. Until then, she can keep her pie hole shut.
Always worked for me!! :)
Good one.
It should probably come out the top of your head. Then you could decorate it better.
Also raises the question if evolution is efficient, why would there be flaws? Wouldnt the less efficient flaw be naturally selected away in favor of those better suited to survival?
But if a circular argument by Rowe.
Gee, who would have guessed another ‘scholarly’ (note the quotes to denote sarcasm) article with the thesis that men are defective.
Leftist females like the one mentioned in this article are horrible people.
JoMa
I'll go ask the wife.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.