Skip to comments.Is the male reproductive system poorly designed?
Posted on 02/08/2019 8:06:16 AM PST by fishtank
click here to read article
They don’t understand they’re arguing theology.
I’m talking about the professors. They’ve been so discombobulated by arguments against evolution from the religious side that they’ve begun arguing the properties of God - theology.
“God wouldn’t design something like this etc...”
That’s theology not science.
And you it’s posted as news, not religion.
Yup, they need to be Armored and Air-Conditioned...
No man would have placed the testicles outside in the open.
Actually it’s a clever design because the testicles are outside the body at 96 degrees. Sperm would not survive in the human body at 98.6!
But, looking at that photo, I think I see the problem.
Delta T, babe.
And yet another bubble head with nothing better to do in life than ........ pick life apart.
Ok. Bad design. How you gonna fix it lady?
What a waste of oxygen.
Plenty of girlfriends while a teen and early twenties. 2 grown kids, yep works perfectly:-)
Read the article.
I’m in Florida and it is warm outside so mine are hanging low. I bet the folks up north theirs are high and tight.
I read somewhere a long time ago it was all about temperature regulation.
“And you its posted as news, not religion.”
That’s not quite coherent, but I agree it should be posted in Religion or General Chat.
But who cares? Not that big a deal.
In order to claim that something is poorly designed, there is an assumption that we know exactly why something was designed as it was. Given that science is learning new things about human physiology daily, mankind is a long ways from understanding all the factors that would go into creating a perfect design. Mankind and scientists in particular need to recognize that we’re not nearly as knowledgeable as we think we are. There is more we don’t know than we do.
Wow, if global warming is true, then everyone’s balls are going to be hanging lower.
We need to ask Kamala for her opinion. She has a great deal more experience in evaluating male genitalia than this dame.
“...poor design claim focuses on the view that if testicles were designed, then why didnt God protect them better.”
Intelligent design made men intelligent enough to protect his testicles. DUH!
I always laugh when these woman empowering self defense trainers show women how to knee a male attacker in the groin and thumb his eyeballs, as if a man would allow such a counter attack.
It’s worked pretty well for the last dozen millennia or so ...
And while we’re at it, tbe other half’s layout isn’t great from the design standpoint. But esthetically, it has a certain appeal.
Heh! Saw what you did there.
They’re outside so they’re easier to scratch. If they were inside you wouldn’t be able to scratch them and therefore one of life’s great pleasures would be denied to men. God was looking out for us.
In addition to the many rebuttals to her argument, I add:
The male reproductive system has been so spectacularly successful that people of her ilk campaign for sterilizatjon, abortion and euthanasia to curb the human population.
Her kind believe that species reproduction and dominance is an evolutionary imperative, not the individual’s personal satisfaction with how it is achieved.
I have found evolutionists hypocritical ever since my undergraduate Biology days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.