Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This just happened in last few minutes. Much more news will come about this soon.
1 posted on 01/22/2019 7:00:56 AM PST by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: PghBaldy

a step in the right direction


2 posted on 01/22/2019 7:03:35 AM PST by relee (Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

"So now you're saying I can't join the marines? Riiiii!"
3 posted on 01/22/2019 7:03:43 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

This is such BS. When I was recruiting we had people rejected for all kinds of medical reasons such as an undescended testicle. And we can’t turn people away for crap like this?


5 posted on 01/22/2019 7:05:54 AM PST by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

(ORDER LIST: 586 U.S.)
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
18A625 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. KARNOSKI, RYAN, ET AL.
The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by
her referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s
December 11, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is
stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and
disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of
certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is
sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall
terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a
writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court
enters its judgment.
Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and
Justice Kagan would deny the application.

(from the PDF at the Court’s website) https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012219zor_8759.pdf


6 posted on 01/22/2019 7:06:36 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy
Fine!

Now get the women off of the battle field.

7 posted on 01/22/2019 7:06:59 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

And to think the military rejected me because I have a slight hearing loss in one ear and seasonal allergies.


9 posted on 01/22/2019 7:08:33 AM PST by EURASLEEP (The EU is Crashing and They're Asleep at the Wheel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

Why would the Court intervene in a military decision? Anything in the Constitution permitting that? What other military decisions would it second guess? Troop deployment? Military strategy? Hiring? Funding?


10 posted on 01/22/2019 7:08:40 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

“... temporarily enforce...”
***********************************


12 posted on 01/22/2019 7:09:58 AM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

How did Bader Ginsburg do anything. Isn’t she bed ridden?


18 posted on 01/22/2019 7:21:07 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

5-4 decision.
Where was RBG when the tally was taken?


19 posted on 01/22/2019 7:24:02 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

So males will have to wear male uniforms and females will have to wear female uniforms? wow... what a controversial policy for the military.


20 posted on 01/22/2019 7:25:20 AM PST by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

Sanity restored, for now. We need another 1-2 Supreme Court seats.

Expect riots.


23 posted on 01/22/2019 7:32:14 AM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

Settled science says:

XX = Female
XY = Male


24 posted on 01/22/2019 7:32:59 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

Settled science says:

XX = Female
XY = Male


26 posted on 01/22/2019 7:33:40 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

I am always interested in WHO among the SCOTUS justices decided on the issues. This article simply said this....

“The justices, however, like for the appeals courts to have considered a case before they weigh in, and even then are selective. It takes four justices to agree to hear a case and often they only agree to step in if the appeals courts are deeply divided on an issue.

It takes five justices to agree to agree to stay a lower court ruling.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, of the court’s liberal wing, said they would have denied the application.”


27 posted on 01/22/2019 7:34:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy; All

People diagnosed with gender dysphoria are mentally ill. They have to be on hormone meds, correct? How the heck did they get into the military in the first place?

And how many sex changes have we Taxpayer footed? Six? A dozen?

So tired of the teeny TINY percentage of LUNATICS (hardly even measurable!) running the asylum.

This is a step in the right direction. MAGA! :)


32 posted on 01/22/2019 7:45:31 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin ( "Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy
Allowing transgenders into our military was for the reason of weakening morale and hurting our military, one highly suspects.

And, the only winners would be the trial lawyers who would be suing members of the military for looking cross-eyed at cross-dressing transvestite in uniform.

36 posted on 01/22/2019 7:52:19 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

More temporary winning!


38 posted on 01/22/2019 7:59:58 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

I wonder how many of the potential RAT presidential candidates will strongly condemn this?


39 posted on 01/22/2019 8:06:11 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PghBaldy

It’s insanity to let the insane into the military.


41 posted on 01/22/2019 8:21:59 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson