Skip to comments.New Details Ruin Khashoggi Hero Story
Posted on 01/04/2019 6:10:23 AM PST by Kaslin
The gruesome murder of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi shredded the idea that Saudi Arabian royalty should be praised for reforming itself. Princes who chop political opponents into little pieces are not nice people. That said, puh-leeze stop it with the adoration of a man who deserves none of it.
Politico ran a gushing headline that read, "Jamal Khashoggi: The Free Thinker Whose Murder Shook the World." Time magazine named him one of "the Guardians," the journalistic muckrakers who became its 2018 Person of the Year.
Time's Karl Vick laid on the praise, and thick, writing: "Khashoggi put his faith in bearing witness. He put it in the field reporting he had done since youth, in the newspaper editorship he was forced out of and in the columns he wrote from lonely exile."
In Vick's overwrought prose, Khashoggi was a bold and independent fact-finder. "What irked the kingdom and marked the journalist for death was Khashoggi's insistence on coming to that conclusion on his own, tempering it with troubling facts and trusting the public to think for itself," Vick wrote. Holy smokes! But it gets even better: "Such independence is no small thing. It marks the distinction between tyranny and democracy."
But wait. ... How independent was Khashoggi? On Dec. 23, the Washington Post acknowledged a "problematic" arrangement between Khashoggi and the autocrats of Qatar, a nemesis of Saudi Arabia (and the owners of "independent" Al Jazeera). Of course, the Post buried these facts in paragraph 19 on page A-14, in a massive 5,000-word story.
It deserved to be the lede. Text messages between Khashoggi and Maggie Mitchell Salem, an executive at Qatar Foundation International and a former State Department official during the Clinton presidency, show she "at times shaped the columns he submitted to The Washington Post, proposing topics, drafting material and prodding him to take a harder line against the Saudi government." The Post added, "Khashoggi also appears to have relied on a researcher and translator affiliated with the organization."
So Khashoggi was railing against one set of authoritarians ... with the research assistance and "drafting" and "shaping" of another set. This doesn't make his ruthless murder any less heinous. But it ought to curtail all the "Free Thinker Just Bearing Witness" rubbish.
The Post claims it was not aware of this little non-independent arrangement. It exploited his death to underline its "Democracy Dies in Darkness" promotional campaigns. It ran a full-page ad in December with a picture of Khashoggi and a candle in front of him and the words "A life is gone. The principles of free expression endure. The Washington Post." Now it has been made aware ... and nothing changes.
There's nothing like appropriating this victim. In reality, Khashoggi wrote 20 pieces for the Post website from September 2017 to September 2018. The Post published him once in the actual newspaper. It wasn't that passionately impressed with his opinions before he was killed.
The Khashoggi exploitation continues. NBC just denounced Netflix for bowing to Saudi pressure and removing an episode (in that country) of Muslim leftist Hasan Minhaj's comedy show, "Patriot Act," that criticized the Khashoggi murder. There in the NBC story was Karen Attiah, Khashoggi's (Qatar-ignorant) opinion editor at the Post, proclaiming, "Saudi Arabia right now is acting like a rogue nation, a rogue state that has no respect for the rule of law, for human life and dignity."
That sounds like a fair comment -- except being a dictator in the Middle East is not exactly going "rogue." It also sounds very much like the talking points the Qatar Foundation would "draft" and "shape" for the "independent" Post to say, even now.
Not saying he deserved to be murdered, but I am saying the media was so far over the top they hit their heads on the moon, which signaled clearly he was undeserving of any praise.
:: The gruesome murder of Saudi dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi shredded the idea that Saudi Arabian royalty should be praised for reforming itself. Princes who chop political opponents into little pieces are not nice people. That said, puh-leeze stop it with the adoration of a man who deserves none of it. ::
Hey, Brent: Please provide the separated pieces of the corpse with sufficient DNA evidence such that the sentence above can be verified.
You can’t even prove Kashoggi is dead! Yet, I can produce a recording of a “screaming death due to torture” from acting in my basement.
Here’s an interesting article outlining how Turkey used gullible media to inject propaganda into the media.
Khashoggi Case- Analysis of an Information Operation
It’s called “firehosing” and in this pdf they tracked it all over the world. It was a deliberate propaganda effort and the media fell for it.
I’m glad the Muslim Brotherhood embedded agent provocateur is dead. Hope it hurt. Lots. May many, many more sharia pushing embeds suffer the same fate. It’s the only way to get rid of these seditious traitors from within.
Hello Ben Rhodes?
How do we actually know the dude really took a dirt nap...?
You might find the articles in post 4 interesting!
Khashoggi was a terrorist. PERIOD.
He was a HS BFF of Bin Laden.
They agreed on everything except method and timetable.
He would have gladly had any of these idiots that are now praising him beheaded and thought nothing of it.......................
Their clock and calendar stopped at the end of the 7th century...................
His father was a gun runner for the Clowns.
Lord of War (movie)
And why do they insist on calling this terrorist a ‘journalist’, just because he wrote a handful of articles for WaPo?
If that’s all it takes to be classified as a ‘journalist’ then I’m Edward R. Murrow.......................
WaPo is owned by Clowns.
Clowns wrote everything for Kashoggi byline
Waleed was supported ($$ & guns) by Clowns (Kashoggi’s fatrher)
Clowns need war in ME to keep influence in Iran/Yemen/Ghanny
DS needs war, somewhere-anywhere, to maintain control
Media hysterics over one of theirs but nothing about murdered Americans in Benghazi.
Maybe Kruschev was right. He said our form of government would not work unless there was a continual war going on....................which he was glad to supply...............
:: Maybe Kruschev was right. ::
Maybe Putin is changing history with a little help from DJT?
He was a full-time muslim brotherhood operative (SPIT!) and wrote a couple of idiot opinion pieces for the Compost. He was NO journalist.
The Washington Post sucks - that’s the real take-away from this piece.
History cannot be changed.
But it can be managed.........................
All legacy media sucks and has as its single purpose the deconstruction of the US as a world power.
Yet, they still operate with little accountability.
The future proves the past.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.