Skip to comments.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GORSUCH AND KAVANNAUGH
Posted on 10/04/2018 11:00:51 AM PDT by Jean2
I have an observation and a question. I don't remember the dims or anyone else having such a cow over Gorsuch. What is the deal with Kavannaugh? Just curious.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chat; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: LittleSpotBlog
How bad is it going to get when RBG finally kicks the bucket??
Nuclear would be an understatement.
41
posted on
10/04/2018 11:17:38 AM PDT
by
rdl6989
To: Jean2
Can’t wait for ACB to replace RBG.
42
posted on
10/04/2018 11:18:11 AM PDT
by
mainevet
(Get an M1911 or two or three or four... no fourteen!)
To: No Socialist
I think they were sooo confident that Hillary would win that it wasn’t worth the fight
43
posted on
10/04/2018 11:18:37 AM PDT
by
RightLady
(Save Western Civilization.)
To: Jean2
Progressive ideology demands group think on their bottom-line issue--population control: else, the eating up of the nation's wealth under socialism couldn't last long enough to get voters to accept it and install them as "the People's" rulers!
To: Jean2
This is about changing the house and senate...not about Kavanaugh.
I hope the next pick is a man also.
To: knarf
Thank you for explaining that. I can only imagine what will happen when RBG retires or assumes room temperature; whichever comes first. Imagine when that happens and Trump nominates another conservative.
46
posted on
10/04/2018 11:19:57 AM PDT
by
Jean2
To: Qiviut
I think RBG has majorly screwed up. Supposedly, she was hanging in there for the Crooked Hag to be elected the first woman president - she wanted the Crooked Hag to nominate her replacement. I still think it is hilarious that she refused to retire while Hussien was president. Yep, I think she was counting on Hillary...whoops.
In fact, don't we partly have Harry Reid to thank for our current 'predicament'? LOL..
47
posted on
10/04/2018 11:20:52 AM PDT
by
Envisioning
(Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
To: Qiviut
I dont know if RBG has that many days left on her life line.Indeed, and now the poor soul has to deal with the constant 24/7 agony of K sitting on the bench alongside her, it could be very trying for her fragile condition. May the good Lord watch over her.
48
posted on
10/04/2018 11:21:14 AM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(America loved football because it exemplifies its "get off my lawn" spirit; that bothers the left.)
To: Jean2
Gorsuch was confirmed in April 2017
The whole Weinstein and #metoo movement stuff occurred in October 2017, six months later.
Had they known that mere allegations could have hurt Gorsuch, they sure as hell would have used them, but they didn’t know what a powerful uncontrolled weapon they had at the time.
49
posted on
10/04/2018 11:21:21 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
To: Bayan
If Trump is called upon to replace Ginsberg, he will likely nominate a woman. Then we will see a real war on a woman (by the Dems).
50
posted on
10/04/2018 11:23:11 AM PDT
by
Cecily
To: No Socialist
Lets pray Kav doesnt turn into another Kennedy. I am hoping he turns into another Scalia after the crap the democrats pulled. He is sure not to forget at any rate....who could?
51
posted on
10/04/2018 11:23:15 AM PDT
by
Envisioning
(Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
To: Jean2
The other reason is that if the Democrats lose potentially 5-7 seats in the Senate in the mid-term elections, the makeup of the Judiciary Committee when Ginsburg vacates will be 12-9 instead of the current 11-10.
They're fighting hard right now because they will have smaller ranks on the committee for the next confirmation.
-PJ
52
posted on
10/04/2018 11:26:51 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: mainevet
53
posted on
10/04/2018 11:27:21 AM PDT
by
Jean2
To: Jean2
Just imagine what they will do when RBG joins her ancestors.
To: Sparticus
"Because this appointment changes the balance of power on the court. " Because this appointment changes the balance of power on the court for the next generation or so...
55
posted on
10/04/2018 11:30:12 AM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: Jean2
Gorsuch was filling Scalia’s seat. noshift in the balance of power.
56
posted on
10/04/2018 11:30:27 AM PDT
by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
To: Jean2
Because communist progressives worship Moloch and they think Kavanaugh will move the balance and they wont be able to worship Moloch with human sacrifices.
Dont let anyone fool you, this is a spiritual battle.
To: Jean2
Gorsuch was filling Scalia’s seat. No shift in the balance of power.
58
posted on
10/04/2018 11:30:49 AM PDT
by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
To: Jean2
I think they were still in a state of shock over the election with Gorsuch. Also, they think they will have the senate in January.
59
posted on
10/04/2018 11:31:02 AM PDT
by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: No Socialist
“Turn into another Kennedy”? Not after the what he has endured!! God’s protections have sustained him thus far, and they will continue to sustain him.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson