Posted on 09/24/2018 10:56:35 AM PDT by detective
Whatever happens to Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats have normalized yet another illiberal position in their pretend crusade to save the Constitution from Donald Trump.
Doesnt Kavanaugh have the same presumption of innocence as anyone else in America? CNNs Jake Tapper asked Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono this past Sunday. I put his denial in the context of everything that I know about him in terms of how he approaches his cases, was her unexpectedly honest answer.
Plainly put, Hirono argues that because Kavanaughwho earned the highest rating from the ABA during his time on the DC appellate courthas a record of originalist jurisprudence, its probable that hes also a gang-raping sexual pervert and would-be rapist. Hey, CNNs legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin says the accusations ring true. You know the type, right? Wrong thinking white guys.
Benjamin Wittes, editor in chief of Lawfare and one of the Never Trumpers purportedly fighting to rescue America from the president, wrote thousands of words rationalizing the notion that the accused, rather than the accuser, bears the burden of proof. No doubt, this is one of those oscillating norms that will apply solely to conservatives. Nonetheless, its a grotesquely illiberal sentiment in any situation, and one that is being ceaselessly repeated by the left and their allies this past week.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
Well, reverse the process. The adversaries patriots are facing have no regard whatsoever for the customs, history and culture of jurisprudence. IOW, they are just like people here with similar attitudes towards Islam.
And claiming they are 'Americans' isn't any cover either. If they categorically dismiss Western civ as a history of patriarchy and oppression, then they reject any standards by which character is measured.
The bottom line is what I keep on trying to remind people, which is the enemy does NOT hold itself responsible for playing by our rules. People need to come to grips that we are in an honest to doG (cold) civil war.
Expecting any quarter from the enemy is a fool's choice. Play the game accordingly.
Corroborating witnesses to the Roy Moore case? McCarthyists? Bah.
Which communist reeducation camp did Sen. Mazie Hirono learn about jurisprudence?
“Theyre going full nihilist and they just want destruction.
- Kavanaugh will get on the Court.
- Ginsburg will die.
- Trump will nominate a very Conservative woman.
- And the Democrats will just start shooting.”
I think you are right. In fact, on another thread I said that I’m just waiting for the shooting to start, because it is inevitable. The Rats will go bonkers and their violence will escalate to widespread gunfire and arson. As long as they confine it to their own neighborhoods I don’t much care, but the problem is they are now moving into MY neighborhood.
With what? ... they all hate guns and are having trouble deciding if they should pee standing up or sitting down.
Mazie Whorono is an outright fascist, who is plainly violating her oath of office.
I should “shut up” because I’m a man? Well, GFY, you evil, fascist bitch! I hope that every man on Hawaii remembers this, and also any woman that loves their husband, sons, father, brothers, etc. Under the “standard” set by this evil, fascist bitch, they are guilty if a female (however that is defined on any given day) merely accuses them of a crime. Again, GFY!!!!!
I don't think that most have the guts to actually do that - but if they do...they are in for a rather quick and rude surprise. The Feinsweins and Whoronos of the Communicrat Party have really gone too far this time. They have pushed a lot of people to the point where they aren't going to take it anymore.
“And the Democrats will just start shooting.”
And that’s when they die.
5.56mm
From your lips to His ears.
How much of a whore she was those days is just as irrelevant as the remote possibility that 17 yr old Kavanaugh wasn't in control of his hormones yet. The fact is that even whores can be assaulted, and have the right to not be...
and the fact is that even IF Kavanaugh acted boorishly that night (an extremely unlikely scenario), the following 35 years of exemplary behavior shows what kind of man he is NOW, which is all that matters (alongside the ability to apply Constitutional Law to cases for him).
(One might also note that Justice Clarence Thomas has not had one tiny complaint against him in the 27 years since he was nominated... which kind of shows how truthful Ms Anita Hill might or might not have been in her testimony.)
“How much of a whore she was those days is just as irrelevant as the remote possibility that 17 yr old Kavanaugh wasn’t in control of his hormones yet. The fact is that even whores can be assaulted, and have the right to not be...”
It IS RELEVANT, despite what you say. Yes, she has the right to say NO, but it’s important to know whether or not she was sexually experienced with more than one boy!
Because you say so? Sorry. The American Legal System disagrees with you. Sexual past is rarely admissible or relevant in sexual assault cases. Just because some girl boinks lots of guys does not imply, in any way imaginable, that it is okay for another guy to assault her. If she is literally in the middle of "pulling a train" and some guy she does not want jumps in, he is not allowed to force himself on her. To imply anything else is grotesque and patently unConstitutional.
Return fire is a bitch.
That is the logical progression. They've got nowhere else go after this circus.
Kirsten Gillibrand likes men who play rough with women.
Sen Gillibrand's father, Doug Rutnik, was an attorney for the NXIVM abusive sex cult in Albany in 2004.
She transferred to work in his Albany office in 2004.
In 2008, Obama nominated Hillary's for SecState, and Kirsten fills the emptied NY Senate seat.
In 2011, she endorses Eric Schneiderman for NY Attorney General.
Schneiderman investigates NXIVM... and suddenly closed the case.
Schneiderman resigns in 2014 after multiple women accused him of violent sexual abuse.
The evidence in the NXIVM investigation is now magically "missing" from the NY AG's office.
Nice timeline....thanks.
” The American Legal System disagrees with you. Sexual past is rarely admissible or relevant in sexual assault cases. “
Perhaps it does, but we are not talking about the American Legal System in this instance. This is a Congressional Hearing, not a trial.
They broke the system long ago. This is just another poisonous fruit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.