Because you say so? Sorry. The American Legal System disagrees with you. Sexual past is rarely admissible or relevant in sexual assault cases. Just because some girl boinks lots of guys does not imply, in any way imaginable, that it is okay for another guy to assault her. If she is literally in the middle of "pulling a train" and some guy she does not want jumps in, he is not allowed to force himself on her. To imply anything else is grotesque and patently unConstitutional.
” The American Legal System disagrees with you. Sexual past is rarely admissible or relevant in sexual assault cases. “
Perhaps it does, but we are not talking about the American Legal System in this instance. This is a Congressional Hearing, not a trial.