Joy Reid Guest: 'Claim' Against Kavanaugh Should be Sufficient to Force Him Out

NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

[governsleastgovernsbest]

C'mon, Kavanaugh, why won't you walk the plank? After all, someone has made a "claim" against you. That, in a nutshell, was the complaint of a guest on Joy Reid's MSNBC show this morning. Said Maya Wiley:

"Douglas Ginsburg was the person that was nominated by Reagan, after Bork got borked. Within a matter of days, he was honest about marijuana use, and had to step down. But a claim of sexual assault is not sufficient?"

Get the rest of the story and view the video here.

[OpusatFR]

Kangaroo Courts are making a come back with the idiots on the left.

What about we start “claiming” all sorts of unsavory things against people. Would that be ok?

[Ron H.]

I recall that Rush was fond of saying for a few years there that with Democrats it's not the seriousness of the crime committed by Republicans that's important but rather it's the seriousness of the allegation against them that's of most importance. (paraphrasing)

Just a mere allegation is good enough for them.

[squarebarb]

Then the minority party Democrats would totally rule the Republic. Every Republican from Congressman to Senator would be claimed against, investigated and forced to resign. Every conservative/Republican mayor commissioner dogcatcher and sheriff, every elected position anywhere anytime which does not have a far-left person. Are they that silly?

[LTC.Ret]

“Are they that silly?”

Duh -— YES!!!

[Alberta's Child]

This kind of idiocy is good news.

It reinforces my belief that Buzzy Ford will never appear to testify, or even to make any accusation against Kavanaugh in a manner that would expose her to legal trouble for lying.

[erkelly]

How about we re-word this so as not to insult half of the deplorables . . .

If the media is (sic) right and most LEFTISTS are ready to condemn a man over a fuzzy recollection of a (sic) obviously fragile PhD basket case, maybe THE LEFT should not be taken seriously. Just sayin’ . . .

[miniTAX]

“Joy(less) Reid sexually molested me, my eight year old son and my dog.”

---

totally credible, especially as to the dog. I believe you.
#fireJoy

[NFHale]

RE “Claim’ Against Kavanaugh Should be Sufficient to Force Him Out.”

Okay, fine.

Then we can all “claim” that liberals are traitorous, treasonous terrorist sympathizers and arrest them, prosecute them, and throw them in Gitmo to rot. With ZERO evidence, by the way, but just because we “claim” it.

Works both ways, Libs.

And maybe not ALL of them. Just pick out a few of their top folks and make examples of them. I have a couple in mind.

They really need to be careful if this is the path they want to go down.

[a fool in paradise]

She was a founder of NOW and wrote Sexual Politics

[StormEye]

Brett Kavanaugh took a bite of my candy bar in kindergarten.
He did it without my permission. A man of this character
cannot be a Supreme Court justice ever.


That's what the Democrats sound like.

[Real Cynic No More]

I claim that Joy Reid seduced me. Is thst enough to ban her from tv?

[2ndDivisionVet]

This is getting too easy.

[Roman_War_Criminal]

What’s even more disturbing is that our nation’s security, military, and intelligence agencies are full of relative thinking marxists like her and it’s only a matter of time before you must prove your innocence instead of your guilt for any so-called crime.

This is how genocide starts with this train of thought.

[Steve_Seattle]

The name on the list that rankles me the most is Tom Hanks who - through his roles as a fake Army hero (”Saving Private Ryan”), and a half-witted dispenser of folk-wisdom (”Forrest Gump”) - tries to come off as a true-blue American, but he’s actually a treasonous, rapist-defending turd.

[YogicCowboy]

The New Rule.

RINOs play along.