Posted on 09/17/2018 4:55:18 AM PDT by Oklahoma
Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case rulled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case. The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V.
(Excerpt) Read more at pacificpundit.com ...
Just about every woman I know that is not living in a convent has been groped or sexually harassed at some point in her life. She very well may have been molested or groped by dozens of other men in HS & College, but not by the one she has accused. She is relaying a true story perpetuated by some other guy, not Kavanaugh.
If she can remember the name of a man she was not in school with and briefly saw for 3 minutes 35 years ago she should be able to recall exactly where she was and how she got there. Or it never happened. She is a liar who doesn’t want to have the homeowner or other potential witnesses contacted.
If she was truly in fear of her life and all that drama she would have made sure to remember that setting and had the smarts to never ever return to the ‘crime scene’ where she nearly got killed again.
The best prevention for ‘man-handling’ is situational awareness and avoiding certain environments and particular men. These men are all the drunken stupid low class ones or the powerful elite classless ones with a sense of entitlement like Kennedy’s, Clinton, Weinstein, Cosby, etc.
A man with BK’s intelligence and aspirations was not going down that path and chance ruining his education and future career. He’s a serious incredibly brilliant man that adores family and respects women and girls. There is no sense of desperation or sleaziness about him.
He doesn’t have the demeanor to have been a predatory jerk. It’s not in his DNA.
She, on the other hand, has every earmark of a liberal gone mad clawing to gain notoriety, political exposure, financial gain, and destroy a perceived political opponent at any cost. Ditto the husband.
There were remarks about him on Heavy.com which have also disappeared. They were about him speaking for her and confirming her BS.
The women ‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to take off her clothing.
KAVANAUGH DID NOT TAKE OFF HER CLOTHING.
The woman ‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to rape her.
KAVANAUGH DID NOT RAPE HER.
The woman ‘felt’ Kavanaugh wanted to hurt her.
KAVANAUGH DID NOT HURT HER.
Many women have sons, husbands, and brothers, grandsons... and they are NOT going to want people they love held to subjective standards that primarily exist within the mind of a woman ... and are NOT backed up by facts.
What if men who raped women used this defense?
A rapists says he ‘felt’ the woman was coming on to him because of the way she smiled.
The rapist ‘felt’ she ‘wanted it’ because she didn’t push him away fast enough.
The rapist ‘felt’ it was OK because all women say ‘no’.
NO ONE WOULD BUY THE RAPISTS BS... AND IT SHOULD BE THE SAME WITH THE WOMAN ACCUSING KAVANAUGH. What matters is ‘what happened’ not what she was ‘feeling’...
ACTIONS MATTER... INTERNAL ‘FEELINGS’ might or might not have anything to do with the reality of what happened.
I'm just pointing out their tendency to censor information that they don't like.
As a matter of fact, big sites no, if the big sites make it clear to people that they are deliberately biased, and that they exist solely to support one side of the political spectrum.
Large communications sites which claim to be fair or unbiased, should absolutely be barred from censoring any non-illegal comments.
I agree. Kavanaugh is a church goer, tutor to the disadvantaged, soup kitchen volunteer, youth sport coach. He is so squeaky clean it hurts. His strongest desire appears to be to do the right thing and be true to his obligations.
During the hearings he exposed his thought processes and I was impressed that he was constantly questioning himself to be sure he wasn’t being arrogant or elitist. His asides to himself were all about “no matter what your station in life or situation you are of value, perhaps even more than I because you have been tried so sorely” “I learn from the people on the soup kitchen line.” etc.
Kavanaugh appears to be a man who examines himself continuously to be sure he is doing the right thing, being the best he can be.
I would never believe this accusation and I expect when the story emerges the reason he said he had never been to that party is because he never went to any party with no adult supervision & underage alcohol drinkers.
I also agree that if her story rings true in any way it is because she has experienced a similar situation with other boys or men.
That's completely unworkable. They will be spammed and rendered useless for any serious commenting. A serious conservative presence requires some moderating and there's a blurry line between moderation and censorship. There is no role for government in defining that line.
Nope. Ralph Blasey left the law firm in 2004. Fusion was formed in 2011. I can't believe the amount of misinformation I'm reading on FR.
Ralph Blasey
Litigation partner
Baker & Hostetler LLP
September 1989 – September 2004 15 years 1 month
Ralph Blasey Exec. VP-Corporate Counsel at Allied Capital Corporation
No. He didn't.
Thanks for the link. I’m till not finding it.
For later...
Those comments disappeared yesterday afternoon.
I wonder why. :)
Rest assured, if these comments referred to Ivanka or Sarah Sanders or Bristol Palin, they would still be there.
The irony of it all is that the same women that lament the loudest in defense of the accuser are likely on phone apps like Tinder that solicit hook-up sex with strangers.
Couldn't find it. The only mention of "Lukas" is in a reply from "Susan Shannon," closing with "Lukas, you are a numbskull in every way. Sorry."
I couldn't find it on the heavy.com page. It must have been deleted (there is a reply to someone named Lukas, but no other mention of Lukas).
The comment is also quoted by commenter "ABB" in the Arkansas Gazette:
I saw someone on Instapundit claim that Christine Ford admitted to having 60 lovers during her life, and when I asked them where they got that information, they said they saw it over at "CT". I told them that I didn't know what that meant, and didn't get a further response.
I think Christine's 15 minutes of fame are just about up.
Lukas made three similar comments about how the accuser describing how she was very popular as she ‘knew’ all the boys and they appreciated her ‘Lewinskys.’
The comments lasted on Heavy.com half the day. I copied and pasted them here, dotting over some of the inappropriate language for the FR forum.
Lukas could be anyone, but I would venture to say he is of her generation given the style of his locker room talk. Younger guys would have been more gross & explicit.
He should re-post them.
They were pretty explicit sexual comments that would likely get erased again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.