Posted on 09/17/2018 4:25:45 AM PDT by cotton1706
Bookworm has noticed a very odd coincidence: after telling no one her story about the alleged incident for decades, she suddenly remembered and spoke about it in couples’ therapy in 2012, when leftists perceived the possibility that Mitt Romney, ahead in the polls, would win the presidency and appoint Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. She writes:
In 2012, Romney ran against Obama. Up until his 47% gaffe, Romney was doing well. He actually had a shot of winning.
For the Democrats, as has been the case since Bork, having a Republican in the White House, especially with the ever-aging but never retiring Ruth Bader Ginsburg a perpetual risk, raised the specter of a conservative judge getting appointed to the Supreme Court. With that in mind, one Twitter user, who must have an amazing memory, remembered something interesting he’d read back in 2012:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I’m afraid the American people are no longer moved by the term “under oath.” They have seen it violated so often on police shows. The real problem we face is the American people themselves.
If that were the case the uniparty would have won the last election and we wouldn’t have Trump.
We have Trump because the rule of law, among other issues, bloody well does matter.
Have most young men fumbled around grabbing a young girl in their youth? Yup.
Have they done it with another guy in the room? Nope.
Do I believe something happened? Maybe about 30%. Do I believe her story? 0%. And that is giving her the benefit of the doubt. A Boy Scout like Kavanaugh would have stopped the second she pushed back in the slightest.
My suspicion is that anonymity only lasted until the check cleared.
So we don’t know what day but it was summer. We don’t know where it was, but it was at a house. We do know Kavanaugh was very drunk and laughing maniacally and she was in the house wearing a swimsuit. And we do know Mark Judge was there.
But Mark says he wasn’t and never saw anything like this. So this is not a he says she says. There is a witness. And the witness says it never happened.
Is this judge a Romney guy?
I sent this to Drudge tipline. If any Trump subscribers could send to his private email or both.
And the Kavanaugh’s were certainly on Ford’s radar. Brett Kavanaugh’s mom was the Maryland judge who foreclosed on Ford’s parents’ home in 1996.
CHRISTINE BLASEY-FORD MOTIVE: REVENGE – KAVANAUGH’S MOTHER JUDGE AGAINST PARENTS IN FORECLOSURE CASE 1996
The mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a MD district judge in 1996, was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Ford’s parents were the defendants.
https://archive.fo/69gvf#selection-511.0-511.714
Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case rulled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case.
The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V.
Isn’t it kind of amazing that all the media reports today didn’t mention this little conflict of interest for Blasey-Ford?
How clever.......a hat for the highly educated pu$$y. So does one have to have a masters to be able to wear this or just a hyphenated name?
Facebook censors must be working overtime. This transparently fake Kavanaugh issue may be just the spark to bring conservatives to the polls in droves this November. I say use it against them.
At this stage there is no upside to having public testimony under oath. Consider BJC lies under oath and not under oath did not stopped his fanatics from believing him and denouncing anyone opposed to him. With less intensity, the same could be said for Anita Hill... people still believe her, make a movie about her, despite the fact that her testimony could not be verified.
It should be process over substance now. DiFi is to blame if there is no hearing. She had ample opportunity but failed to raise this issue in a timely fashion. That was her decision, and with all the hearings, materials, background checks, etc, it is an abuse of process to obstruct the due process that is also owed to the nominee. To allow the allegation at this hour is very suspicious, in fact a dirty political trick by a veteran Senator who knows better. To reward such behavior makes any future GOP nominee very uncertain process and may actually chill getting qualified people to serve. The Dems need to be held to the BJC Standard that they set during his impeachment, including failing to address the claims of Juanita Broaderick.
The modern day Salem Witch Trials must end. I hope the GOP Senators are strong enough to stand up to this institutional corruption.
In the best Hillary voice: "Was it a horny little freshman girl or a junior boy out for a good time that evening?!?! What difference, at this point, does it make???"
I think there's a decent chance she refuses.
But if she does go under oath, then lards her statement with believes and feels...
You know what, just subpoena her. Swear her in, and let the chips fall where they may.
And then prosecute.the living 💩 out of anyone committing perjury. Do that, and we'll have a lot less of this cr@p.
yeah, it all sounds like a recipe for disaster...
LOL! That was a good one!
“A Boy Scout like Kavanaugh would have stopped the second she pushed back in the slightest.”
How can a guy know unless he tries? That’s the game. A simple no thank you and a gentleman ceases and desists.
Why?
She’ll just lie like a rug.
And any attempt to actually get the truth out of her will be portrayed as nasty misogynistic right-wing men attacking a helpless woman.
Her brother Ralph III worked for Baker Hostetler for 15 years. Baker Hostetler was/is Fusion GPS’ law firm. She’s affiliated with “Indivisible” in Silicon Valley. Pre-scrubbed her FB and LinkedIn, then lawyered up with a lefty DC feminist lawyer before flipping the switch.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jolievieille/status/1041568593677361152
And several Republicans on the committee will to a-scared to challenge her statement
Still not sure why 47% was a gaffe. Truth is truth.
Gotta stop accepting their premises which are lies.
I've learned a lot over the years and none is more important than to never give the benefit of the doubt to a leftist, political operative. They are trying to destroy our nation and heritage and they must be exposed and destroyed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.