With all due respect (none actually), Ruth Bader Ginsperg does look like an evil little troll in the photo accompanying the article.
Posted on 08/28/2018 8:48:53 AM PDT by fwdude
HOUSTON, August 23, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Rising baritone singer Samuel Schultz has accused a prominent homosexual couple whose “marriage” was officiated by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of drugging and violently raping him in 2010, the New York Daily News reports.
That year, as a 23-year-old graduate student at Rice University, Schultz says he met opera countertenor David Daniels and conductor Scott Walters at a closing night party for Houston Grand Opera’s run of “Xerxes.” According to his complaint, they invited him back to the apartment they were staying in for drinks, where he blacked out after just a couple sips.
Schultz says he awakened the next day “in a bed alone, completely naked,” inexplicably sore, and “bleeding from my rectum.” Daniels and Walters were not there when he woke up, but when they returned, they asked if he “had a good time” and Daniels allegedly said “‘Don’t worry about the BB thing, I’m totally negative.’ BB in this case meant bareback, otherwise known as raping me without a condom.”
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
If they were GAY, they wouldn't be homosexuals. I just hate to see the word GAY being trashed by these sodomites.
Gay Homosexual Couple Married By Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Big Media will tell us it’s all ok, because of how often this is done by heterosexuals.
Well, you should also put “married” in quotes to distinguish it from the real thing.
I once knew a gay couple in San Francisco, and one of the pair (we worked in the same lab) said they would very regularly try to seduce painters, delivery people, the pool guy, repairmen....
I mean they would go about this hobby as a PAIR.
Have you ever IN YOUR LIFE encountered normal, straight married couples who do that..?
They are COMPLETELY different from us.
Why does he wait 7 or 8 years to speak-up? I can not assign guilt based on a he said/he said without evidence. Rape is a serious charge and we don’t know what happened. It could be real or it could be for money or even just to ruin someone the way they been trying with Trump.
[shrug] It’s what these people do. The public schools are teaching our children that it’s not only “normal”, it’s actually a hate crime to take issue with this sort of behavior.
There is nothing festive about anal warts.
If it wouldn’t have been for his confiding in that third party (inadmissible as hearsay is) then I wouldn’t believe him completely. More than likely a ‘lovers’ quarrel. However, I do believe this is par for the course in homosexual culture.
I’ll never understand the desire to stick the johnson up the exit canal of stank. To practice sodomy is a path to destruction one way or another.
Doesn’t that sound like the story of Lot and his daughters?
Granted it was a group in Lot’s day, but still...
I don’t think all homosexuals operate like that. I am sure that some do though.
Let’s be truthful, if a straight couple were attempting to entice members of the public into their bedroom, it would be evil too.
I believe some do.
>>If they were GAY, they wouldn’t be homosexuals. I just hate to see the word GAY being trashed by these sodomites.<<
That fight was long lost.
We can TRY to reclaim it but I would rather recoup “niggardly” which has no ready substitution word.
The young man explains it in detail and why he didn’t come forward. Male rape is an incredibly difficult thing to process for men. I read his story and I believed it. He told people right after and went to the hospital a week later.
Society is preaching that queers have been unjustly discriminated against, that they're all just great, that they never do anything wrong, and that you're evil if you say anything bad about a single queer or queers in general. The USSC certified their normalcy when it ruled that they can marry one another.
Stating the fact that such folks are prone to violence and are mentally warped or they wouldn't be queers in the first place is just hate speech. (/sarc)
From the article: “The 85-year-old Ginsburg, the subject of an upcoming Hollywood movie, said in July that she has ‘about at least five more years’ before she retires.”
Ruth needs to retire ASAP! She’s obviously on death’s door and should try to find some meaning in her life before she’s kaput for good.
And besides, her decisional record is a gross embarrassment to the court ... judges like Ruth breed contempt for the judiciary, serious contempt
With all due respect (none actually), Ruth Bader Ginsperg does look like an evil little troll in the photo accompanying the article.
Keep that reluctance in mind when the accusations of sodomy occur in other realms than "the theatre".
Keep a copy of that picture in your first-aid kit, for when you need an emetic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.