Posted on 08/06/2018 8:31:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The liberal media are in such a desperate hurry to change the demographics in this country that they can't wait for rhetoric to match reality. That's why it's understandable that the New York Times claimed that America is only 60% white. In case you had doubts, the Times even linked to a U.S. Census website to back up its claim. How much more authoritative can you be than that?
The only problem is that the webpage the Times linked to does not say the U.S. population is 60% white; it says the U.S. population is 76% white.
You might chalk this up to sloppy fact-checking except for two inconvenient facts:
1. Now that the Times has "come out of the closet" by hiring editorial writer Sarah Jeong, whose specialty seems to be writing all the ways in which she despises white people, every article the Times writes must be viewed through the distortive lens of anti-white bias. If an article, like this one, could be the result of either an honest error or anti-white bias, it's probably anti-white bias, given the Times' defense of out-and-out racists like Jeong.
2. The whole premise of the article, despicably entitled "Hollywood Is as White, Straight and Male as Ever," requires the population to be 60% white. The article claims that minority actors are under-represented in films because 70% of acting roles are white. Only by claiming that whites are 60% of the population can the Times claim that whites are overrepresented in films. In fact, at over 76% of the population, whites are somewhat underrepresented in films.
If there are 325 million people in America, and 16% have been erased, that's 52 million white people who have been written out of existence. They have become "unpeople," whisked out of existence by doublethink.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Well, the “Deplorables” don’t really count, so....
just more #FAKENEW
“...New York Times erases 52 million white people...”
And jackass jeong would like to erase the rest.
The liberal media (a redundant term) needs to be erased.
It’s the Invisible Majority........................
They’re working on it.
non-white times
How and why is this newspaper still in business? Who reads or buys anything from this Marxist Liberal rag?
...this is what I would have said.
LOL
;^\
It is correct if you consider Hispanics as not being white. I live in Texas. I’m around Hispanics all the time. Most are not white and should not be placed in that category. The ones here primarily come from indigenous people. The “white” Hispanics are fairly rare. Now, in Mexico itself... sure... the middle class and wealthy are mostly whites of Spanish decent. The Cubans here are also mostly of Spanish origin. But no, most so called “Hispanics” in the USA now are not white and have only a small fraction of Spanish if any.
Well, they just hired that woman that really, really, really hates all white people. I imagine things like this will be a future trend for NYT.
These slimes people are racist trash. Anyone who supports them is racist trash. Anyone who gives them any money in support is racist trash. Subhuman retrogrades.
White people are just “useless eaters”.
Non-whites do count for them, as they equal Dim votes, equals power for their agenda. Trump might even be breaking that mold.
Quick check at Wikipedia the number depends on whether you count white Hispanics as white or not. Without Hispanic whites it does get down near 60.
Hey NYT,put your money where your mouth piece is. White males will no longer be allowed to buy your newspaper.
The Slimes' recent hire of a racist and bigot is going to finish them off, because the demographic they think can save the paper are not readers, and not really buyers of things. Thanks SeekAndFind.
P
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.