Posted on 07/24/2018 11:47:20 AM PDT by detective
A federal judge in Boston is allowing a lawsuit against the Trump administrations ending of temporary protections for immigrants to proceed on the grounds the decisions were motivated by racial prejudice.
U.S. District Judge Denise Casper rejected Monday the governments bid to dismiss the lawsuit, which a group of immigrants and civil rights organizations filed in February in response to the cancellation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and El Salvador.
Statements by administration officials including President Donald Trump make it plausible that a discriminatory purpose was a motivating factor in a decision to wind down TPS protections, Casper said.
Plaintiffs have successfully made out their prima facie case, she wrote in a ruling that allows the lawsuit to go forward, according to Reuters.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Another program of U.S. government handouts to illegals is brought to the courts.
Who does the judge think he is?
Like the so called “Muslim” ban the Executive has the absolute power to set immigration policy.
“U.S. District Judge Denise Casper”
First Black Federal Judge in MA, appointed by “guess who,” B. Obola.
A broad...who should go home and bake cookies and not be allowed near a courtroom!
He thinks he's a she.
“A federal judge in Boston is allowing a lawsuit against the Trump administrations ending of temporary protections for immigrants to proceed”
I hope someone is keeping a list of all these judges!
On what legal grounds does she base this judgement?
Temporary status is solely the under the powers of the executive office pursuant to las written by the legislature.
The judge isnt raciss to think that theres only black people in the countries Trump blocked right?
“Plaintiffs have successfully made out their prima facie case,
“Prima facie this you pissy little bitch!”
I already sent in my TPS report.
Obvious rampant abuse by radical left leaning judges to impose legislation needs serious addressing. This abuse has been ongoing from day one in President Trump’s election.
If the federal supreme court won’t put a stop to frivolous use of the judicial system, who can?
The trend is clear: liberal female judges don’t give two poops about the constitution or the law, nor do they think too hard. You can get them to rule anything you want as long as it hurts Trump.
NOT that long ago, in our youth we used to laugh at the great comedy by George Burns, and Gracie Allen. This quote from Travelanche about Gracie sums up my point:
"She was simply dumb, and a little bit crazy. Furthermore, she did not even play dumb, although her naturally high pitched voice helped reinforce the image that she was. As far as you knew it by watching her body language she was a perfectly intelligent woman, completely in the right and sincere about whatever she was talking about. The twist was, she was talking preposterous nonsense.
I never knew Burns, and Allen to be political in their act, but I look back at Gracie, and "the twist was, she was talking preposterous nonsense", and that's what we see always out of the left.
Federal judge-president Denise “Obama Slut” Casper weighs in from the replica Oval Office in her chambers.
It’s Whoopi’s sister!!!
You mean the Federal judge-president...
“Whoopi” Casper...
Same sneer.
My first thought as well.
Whatever you do judge, don't look to the LAW to decide cases, rather look into the hearts and minds of the administrators (and our President) hundreds of miles away and decide for yourself what the law should be and how you wish to rewrite it.
Ding bat in a black robe. That is dangerous to us all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.