Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five justices cannot break the solidarity of America’s unions
The Hill ^ | 06/29/18 | Lee Saunders

Posted on 06/29/2018 9:28:28 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 is a ruthless and brazen attack on the freedom of working people. It caps off a shocking Supreme Court term, which saw the justices threaten the rights of women, LGBTQ people, Muslims, and now public service workers.

The 1.6 million members of AFSCME keep American communities safe and strong through their selfless service. We are social workers, EMTs, corrections officers, school custodians and more. We plow the roads, drive the school buses and pick up the trash. But that is apparently not enough to get a fair hearing before the nation’s highest court.

The Janus case was brought to the court on the strength of political and financial support from some of the country’s richest people, who want to rig the economy and the political system even more in their own favor.

SNIP

The court’s decision is also a breathtaking act of judicial activism. It reverses a longstanding precedent that has helped to keep labor peace in communities nationwide for more than four decades. By imposing a one-size-fits-all solution, it violates the principles of federalism that conservatives claim to cherish. Justice Kagan put it best in her dissenting opinion:

“There is no sugarcoating today’s opinion. The majority overthrows a decision entrenched in this Nation’s law — and in its economic life — for over 40 years. As a result, it prevents the American people, acting through their state and local officials, from making important choices about workplace governance.

ETC...

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biglabor; janusvafscme; ruling; scotus; unions; whistlepastgraveyard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Solidarity Forever!
1 posted on 06/29/2018 9:28:28 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The 1st Amendment is judicial activism. We saw this movie play out. Most gov. and teachers’ union members decided that the union did not give them much value.


2 posted on 06/29/2018 9:30:45 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

So much carp, so little time...

I is mind numbing to watch the Leftists says something like this.

“The court’s decision is also a breathtaking act of judicial activism.”

If it were, they would be praising it for decades.


3 posted on 06/29/2018 9:30:49 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 is a ruthless and brazen attack on the freedom of working people.

Wrong.

4 posted on 06/29/2018 9:31:59 AM PDT by Maceman (We need a temporary ban on Muslims just until churches and synagogues can be built in Mecca.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If the AFSCME people are so good and noble they’ll happily volunteer and pay their union dues... right?

What’s the problem here?


5 posted on 06/29/2018 9:32:02 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Their heads are exploding.
Their framework for their “Progressive Utopia” is crumbling....falling apart.


6 posted on 06/29/2018 9:32:12 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

7 posted on 06/29/2018 9:32:36 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

No but they can break their corrupt special treatment they been granted by decades of politicians.


8 posted on 06/29/2018 9:32:45 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ("The political class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Public employee unions should not even be legal.


9 posted on 06/29/2018 9:34:21 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

But, it CAN SHRINK IT!


10 posted on 06/29/2018 9:34:30 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

translation: We’ll just go back to the old tried-and-true method of sending thugs to your door.


11 posted on 06/29/2018 9:34:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“...The court’s decision is also a breathtaking act of judicial activism. It reverses a longstanding precedent that has helped to keep labor peace in communities nationwide for more than four decades....”
************************
LOL — “Longstanding precedent to keep labor peace” = Things will be “peaceful” for you as long as you involuntarily give us money from every paycheck you get. In other times that was referred to as “protection money”.


12 posted on 06/29/2018 9:35:26 AM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“5 justices cannot break the solidarity of America’s unions” but 10’s of thousands declining to have dues withheld will!

But this line, “It reverses a longstanding precedent that has helped to keep labor peace in communities nationwide” tells us what is coming next. Loss of dues will result in violence.

It’s like a mob protection racket. “It would sure be a shame if something happened to your non union paying household.”


13 posted on 06/29/2018 9:37:56 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yep.. The Left will always find a way to be corrupt and evil.


14 posted on 06/29/2018 9:38:31 AM PDT by DivineMomentsOfTruth ("There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and persue it steadily." -GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

EMTs, custodians, social workers, corrections officers can still do what they do. But now they don’t have pay dues to corrupt unions that use it to elect creeps like Obamalamadindong.


15 posted on 06/29/2018 9:40:16 AM PDT by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Yes...... we need union solidarity like that in the International Ladies Garment Workers union


16 posted on 06/29/2018 9:44:29 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... In August our cities will be burning))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Employees strike against Employer = good!

Employees strike against Union = Bad!


17 posted on 06/29/2018 9:49:29 AM PDT by SirFishalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Solidarity was broken long ago by greedy Union leaders.


18 posted on 06/29/2018 9:53:53 AM PDT by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Lee Saunders is president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, a labor union of 1.6 million American workers.
19 posted on 06/29/2018 10:03:07 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Public employee unions should not even be legal.

All Trump has to do is kill JFK's EO 10988 and Nixon's subsequent one.

20 posted on 06/29/2018 10:09:55 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson