Posted on 03/29/2018 4:37:11 PM PDT by Innovative
President Donald Trump’s administration must defend a lawsuit targeting his plan to end a program offering protection from deportation for hundreds of thousands of children of undocumented immigrants.
U.S District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in Brooklyn, New York, narrowed but didn’t dismiss the suit on Thursday, finding that there was a “plausible inference” that it was illegally aimed at Mexicans. He previously blocked the U.S. government from ending the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, and from halting the renewal process, but hadn’t decided whether to allow the case to proceed.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Of course we are.
Where do you get such tripe?
Also, we are not a sane nation anymore.
Quite a reach to be calling these “CHILDREN” (of the corn I might add).
It certainly feels that way. It’s out of control.
Thank God we have a Republican Majority in Congress to reign in these recalcitrant judges and the inferior courts, which are under their Direct Control. ALL Federal Courts and Judges except the Supreme court are a creation of Congress, Congress is their Daddy!
Paul Ryan in conjunction with the House Judiciary Committee must start impeachment precedings against these rouge judges.
Do your job Ryan.
5.56mm
His face looks a little puffy and he has a big red nose.
Looks like he could suck a golfball through a garden hose...
Something about the eyes and the smirk.
Trump appealed straight to the Supreme court but SCOTUS refused to hear it.
So now I think the Trump admistration is appealing to circuit courts.
The judge has said Trump can’t end DACA protections for existing DACA applicants. But the judge didn’t extend protections to new applicants.
So at least the damage is ended, no new DACA applicants.
The judge has no right to arrogate the power of the President to himself.
An EO is a temporary direction to the bureaucracy and survives only as long as a President sees fit. It is not a law that lives on once issued.
So where does the Judiciary think they get this kind of power?
The real question in this case is will we let this Constitutional abomination stand. Nothing like it has ever been asserted.
The judge said Trump erred in relying on arguments the program was unconstitutional. Don't know if he backed that up with any arguments in his ruling.
Given the judge's claim that the program is constitutional, then the question become can you end a program that provides protections that people were previously counting on? This judge apparently thinks you can ban new entrants but not remove the protections from those already under the program.
I think the judge is out of line. But I'm just trying to make sense of the judges ruling.
Trump appeal should be on two fronts.
Leave DACA alone the judge has them locked in.
That photo just screams “pedophile”.
How about that. There was no need for Japan to go to war against us in 1941. All they had to do is sneak over the border and file a lawsuit.
Thanks Innovative.
“Illegally aimed at Mexicans”
Why would that be illegal?
Liver Lips
He uggleee
I like the label dreamers assigned by old media scum for criminal aliens.
>What is the matter with this judge?
A: He hasn’t been handed his ass by Congress/etc. and kicked off the Court for judicial activism/violation of Oath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.