Skip to comments.
Court orders full restoration of DACA program
The Washington Times ^
| February 13, 2018
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 02/13/2018 1:32:27 PM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
To: teletech
I understand SCOTUS will hear this on an emergency basis in March. (The overturning of the original illegal EO). Great. I wonder if CJ Roberts will somehow manage to bungle this one up, too.🤦♀️
41
posted on
02/13/2018 1:48:04 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: morphing libertarian
Im beginning to think the founders f-ed up when they established a judiciary.
If you recall the SCOTUS claimed much of this power for the courts in Marbury v. Madison, which was not decided until 1803.
To: Buckeye McFrog
We have a ‘Judicial Coup’ in progress.
43
posted on
02/13/2018 1:48:57 PM PST
by
CMailBag
To: jazusamo
“Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis said the administration does have the power to revoke DACA, but it must give a sound reason for doing so ...”
Obama can create it by Presidential decree but it cannot be revoked by a Presidential decree without a “sound reason”. We can quess who decides whether the reason is sound. Unless there is some statute that supports the judges requirement he should be removed from the bench.
44
posted on
02/13/2018 1:49:55 PM PST
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
To: jazusamo
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis! How many divisions has he got?
45
posted on
02/13/2018 1:50:03 PM PST
by
Hugh the Scot
("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
To: jazusamo
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis said the administration does have the power to revoke DACA, but it must give a sound reason for doing so 1. - Because a president does not have the constitutional power or authority to create such a law!
2. - Because a judge does not have the constitutional power to create such a law or to order a president to perform an unconstitutional act.
46
posted on
02/13/2018 1:50:55 PM PST
by
Vlad The Inhaler
(The only trannie I want to see is a Muncie 4 Speed M-22 Rock Crusher)
To: jazusamo
SINCE WHEN DOES THE JUDICIARY LEGISLATE OVER A PRESIDENT ?
47
posted on
02/13/2018 1:50:59 PM PST
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
To: jazusamo
Wait....you mean throngs of NON-paid American citizens, coming from across these fruited plains....on their own dime, aren’t marching in front of these two judged homes demanding that our Constitution and Rule of Law are followed???
48
posted on
02/13/2018 1:51:10 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
the intrusion into executive orders and immigration which is related to national security is very disturbing. And as liberals know, there are hundreds of judges who will hear anything they propose.
To: Liz; hoosiermama; onyx; Tennessee Nana; TADSLOS
50
posted on
02/13/2018 1:53:07 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Brooklyn Attitude
How come the F’n RATS can find judges to block Trump’s actions but the F’n Repubs could never find judges to block OBASTURD’s unconstitutional actions?
51
posted on
02/13/2018 1:55:00 PM PST
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
To: teletech
Won’t surprise me if some low-level federal judge decides that he has the authority to overrule SCOTUS . . . yep, that is where I see our country going - it was just curtailed a little under Trump.
52
posted on
02/13/2018 1:55:15 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: jazusamo
Well we have 3 equal branches of Government. Trump needs to tell these judges to go to *ell. President Trump has the actual law on his side. These judges need to be removed for abuse of power.
DACA was Illegal from the get go....
And then we have:
“but it must give a sound reason for doing so”
What law does the judge state to support such a statement.
53
posted on
02/13/2018 1:55:17 PM PST
by
Revel
To: jazusamo
This clown is attempting to order DJT to continue an unconstitutional program started by his predecessor. DACA is an EO and as such can be ended by another EO-period.
Trump doesn't even owe this crack-pot judge a courtesy FU.
54
posted on
02/13/2018 1:55:25 PM PST
by
skimbell
To: jazusamo
"Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis said the administration does have the power to revoke DACA, but it must give a sound reason for doing so" Legal rulings have to be grounded in actual law. What law is this ruling grounded in? None, I say.
DACA was an executive order, put in place by the prior president. As such, the current president has full authority to cancel it.
55
posted on
02/13/2018 1:55:41 PM PST
by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: jazusamo
What authority does a judge have to implement an EXECUTIVE order (especially an illegal one)? Answer: NONE.
We need to go back to the days when "judges" like this were run out of town ahead of a bunch of pitchforks and torches ... if they were lucky.
56
posted on
02/13/2018 1:57:13 PM PST
by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
I’m sure it’s been asked before...
But if the democrats are so absolutely sure that their policies are what America wants, why are they so desperate for non Americans to be here to vote for them?
57
posted on
02/13/2018 1:58:39 PM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(Vote for your guns!)
To: Revel
The president has deferred to the court before on matters of national security (immigration bans) why would he step up now?
To: NewJerseyJoe
Would be a shame if patriots started retiring activist judges.
59
posted on
02/13/2018 2:00:52 PM PST
by
Heavyrunner
(Socialize this.)
To: jazusamo
Why even have elections? Just let the judges run the place.
60
posted on
02/13/2018 2:01:09 PM PST
by
ealgeone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson