Posted on 12/21/2017 9:44:20 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
How about stopping with the stupid “Boom” crap. It’s just theater. Boom comes when there are indictments. Up to that point, it is just a fart in the wind.
Remember Rosenstein and his spouse, Lisa H. Barsoomian.
Rod Rosenstein spouse is Lisa H. Barsoomian, an attorney
https://twitter.com/Imperator_Rex3/status/943663663814021120
https://twitter.com/Imperator_Rex3/status/943663663814021120
see poster “DianeOmite @DianeRosemond”
Judicial Watch v. FBI, 01-CV-00248-rmu
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRiVjbMXcAUAaES.jpg
Lisa H. Barsoonian
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRiVmZaW4AE0PhC.jpg
No confidence in Sleepy Sessions’ DOJ actually getting the job done. Counting on a “collegial” whitewash.
The Clintonista team is going to have a busy Xmas/New Year’s killing potential witnesses.
I suggest you take a step back and ask yourself a very basic, binary question: do you believe Trump will prevail, or will he lose? Now, before you answer, did you see the tax reform celebration yesterday? As a student of history, politics and general reader of psychology, including motivation & rationalization, I will opine that Trump has already won. People driven by ambition have a 6th sense for detecting who's the victor. If you watch the sycophants, RINOs and other hangers-on behind Trump, you may notice a distinct change in attitude.
If one concludes that Trump has already won, then any rationale analysis will begin to consider the necessary steps that will logically lead from that position. That's what I'm suggesting you consider: turn your skills towards the positive. Just because the enemy had a constant string of victories for 28 years doesn't necessarily mean they would win. But negativity and pessimism can take hold even when the tide has turned.
I'm not suggesting refraining from criticism or rebuttal, but rather try to view current events through a prism of victory. How Trump rolls up domestic enemy forces is a worthy subject for discussion, especially for those intrigued by the specific details as it's accomplished.
There we go ...
I’m sure they assembled a crack team of rug-lifters and sweepers.
I hate to say it, but I have very little confidence that the DOJ is going to actually do its job. I don’t expect anything significant to become of this.
I’m not falling for this crap.
The DOJ/FBI are going to investigate themselves?
Puhleeze. Where’s the real investigation?
“Don’t worry, be happy. The statue of limitations will expire long before any actual charges can be brought against any Democrat, unlike those against Republicans”
EXACTLY.
This is a dog and pony run out the clock show on two fronts. 1) midterms 2) statute of limitations for crimes committed years ago. I’m sure time has passed for much already.
When the DOJ "investigates", who do they use - the FBI? There are probably at least a hundred Peter Strzoks, including the original, along with Rod Rosenstein, Bruce Ohr and Andrew McCabe still lurking in the FBI. Not to mention that Jeffie Sessions is a simpleton. Who expects ANYTHING to come out of this?
A REAL investigation should've been conducted years ago BEFORE we gave Putin OUR uranium, and the clinton crime syndicate reaped millions.
Yes he did.
Here's more about Rosenweenie's wife representing BJ Clinton.
Thanks for the Barsoomian link.
Here’s more about Rosenweenie’s wife representing BJ Clinton.
Scan the linked item and pay particular attention the last page (#23).
Page #23.... The name also cited should be
R. Craig Lawrence
not Craig R. Lawrence
See Lisa Barsoomian and her spouse, Rosenstein
R.I.C.O. (Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization) fits the bill there. Lay out the entire scheme. Ok to include indictable acts that predate the statute of limitations, Usually 5 years prior to the date of the indictment. Bring in criminal forfeiture and take the entire enterprise completely down.
cross-reference Lisa Barsoomian (spouse of Rosenstein) Turkmen v. Ashcroft is one of two related actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York by plaintiffs who were investigated and detained for suspected terrorist ties in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. A potential but uncertified class action suit, this case is on a second appeal and cross-appeal to the Second Circuit following a dismissal-in-part by District Court Judge Gleeson on January 15, 2013. The consolidated appeals were heard on May 1, 2014.
The related case, Elmaghraby v. Ashcroft (also assigned to Judge Gleeson), was settled following a ruling by the Supreme Court (Ashcroft v. Iqbal, No. 07-1015).
Description from Center for Constitutional Rights: Turkmen v. Ashcroft is a lawsuit brought against former Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI Director Robert Mueller, former INS Commissioner James Ziglar, and employees of the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, New York. The suit charges that on the pretext of minor immigration violations, the Immigration and Naturalization Service unlawfully held the plaintiffs -- all men from Arab or South Asian countries -- in detention for the months that the FBI took to clear them of links to terrorism, long after the time their immigration cases were completed. The complaint alleges that Defendants violated the detainees' rights under the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments and under international human rights law. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The eight named plaintiffs include Muslims from Pakistan, Egypt, Algeria and Turkey, as well as a Hindu man born in India and a Buddhist from Nepal. Despite the fact that the government has never charged any of the plaintiffs with connections to terrorism, the INS kept them in detention for up to nine months. Instead of being presumed innocent until proven guilty, they and hundreds of other post-9/11 detainees were presumed guilty of terrorism until proven innocent to the satisfaction of law enforcement authorities. The suit further charges that some of these detainees were improperly assigned to the Administrative Maximum Special Housing Unit (ADMAX SHU); kept in solitary confinement with the lights on all day; placed under a communications blackout so that they could not seek the assistance of their attorneys, families, and friends; subjected to physical and verbal abuse; forced to endure inhumane conditions of confinement; and obstructed in their efforts to practice their religion. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages. [ Accessed 10/29/14].
Run a simple DuckDuckGo search on “R. Craig Lawrence, attorney.”
Looks like the power couple (Rosenstein & spouse Barsoomian) are a known pair.
https://stonecoldtruth.com/muller-rosenstein-and-comey-the-three-amigos-from-the-deep-state/
Tell me there is no pillow talk.... /sarc
Multiple videos of multiple recusals...
https://m.youtube.com/results?q=jeff%20sessions%20recuse%20clinton&sm=3
More than 7 yrs have passed since the Uranium One deal. That’s the only reason Sessions is allowing questions to be asked about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
