Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Parhamovich said he was carrying all that money because he didn't want to leave it behind in his apartment. Plus he had some large music-related purchases coming up in the near future. A fair question might be: Why not put the money in the bank instead?

And I suppose a fair answer would be: It's a free country. He should be able to do whatever he wants to with his own money. (The Wyoming police evidently disagreed with that.)

1 posted on 12/04/2017 5:46:17 AM PST by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

Sessions will not approve of this judge’s decision. But I approve — bigly.


2 posted on 12/04/2017 5:48:33 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

Many if not most musicians are paid in cash after their gig.


3 posted on 12/04/2017 5:50:29 AM PST by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

The so-called musician had nefarious purposes for that cash. Undoubtedly. BUT, the Wyoming Judge was completely correct in ordering it returned.

Having some knowledge of law enforcement, I can tell you officers are griping today about this judge and will whine like 8th graders for months about any this judge does or says.


5 posted on 12/04/2017 5:52:54 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

Some people do not trust banks.

There is a reason for this. Multiple countries have declared “bank holidays” where you cannot get your money out of the banks. Those “holidays” can stretch out a long way, or allow the government to seize funds.


6 posted on 12/04/2017 5:53:11 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
Why not put the money in the bank instead?

Because some people (including me) don't trust them...
7 posted on 12/04/2017 5:56:49 AM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

officers then told him that he could leave if he signed a form saying he was giving the $91,800 to the investigative agency for “narcotics law enforcement purposes.”

We call this “Felony Extortion” and every Public Servant on scene belongs in PRISON for LIFE!!!


9 posted on 12/04/2017 6:10:49 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

It was probably income he got in cash to avoid the taxes. Good for him


11 posted on 12/04/2017 6:13:26 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
officers then told him that he could leave if he signed a form saying he was giving the $91,800 to the investigative agency

Your money or your life!

Cmon jackboot prohibition lickers! Tell us how this is necessary!

12 posted on 12/04/2017 6:14:22 AM PST by rawcatslyentist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

LEOs take an oath to defend, protect and uphold our Constitution. What the hell ever happened to that? Instead they now blatantly break the law and keep the rewards. Guilty until proven innocent?!


16 posted on 12/04/2017 6:25:57 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

That cash might buy a couple of ‘58 Les Pauls or a mint condition blond ES 335 with double white PAF’s and the original stop-tail setup.


17 posted on 12/04/2017 6:27:08 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

But can he play smoke on the water?


23 posted on 12/04/2017 6:43:35 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

If the judge’s orders the sherrif jailed for contempt, it will probably expedite the cash return. Signing anything was under duress.


29 posted on 12/04/2017 7:13:57 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

I don’t care whether he intended to pay taxes on that money or not. I don’t care whether he intended to use that money for “legitimate” purposes or not. It was stolen by law enforcement, and I’m glad he’s getting his money back. I hope he will also recover damages. Stealing is not okay, not even when government officials are the ones engaged in theft.


37 posted on 12/04/2017 8:54:52 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
He lied and said it was a friend's.

Dumb really, really dumb. At that moment the cash became abandon property.

38 posted on 12/04/2017 9:07:22 AM PST by usurper ( version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right
officers then told him that he could leave if he signed a form saying he was giving the $91,800 to the investigative agency

How is this not considered anything but outright thievery and abuse of authority?

And Jeff Sessions supports this. Sessions is and probably will be the single biggest mistake Trump will make during his presidency.
40 posted on 12/04/2017 9:13:54 AM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

I hope the judge also made the police pay his legal fees.


44 posted on 12/04/2017 10:13:14 AM PST by zeugma (I always wear my lucky red shirt on away missions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

no due process


46 posted on 12/04/2017 10:15:33 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leaning Right

What was the original stop for? Sounds like a cut&dried violation of the 4th and 5th by Uncle LEO.


50 posted on 12/04/2017 11:05:29 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson