Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Article image.

1 posted on 11/02/2017 11:44:04 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

Bloggers may be an exception.


2 posted on 11/02/2017 11:45:37 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Take Covfefe Ree Zig!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Diversity to the extent of exclusion.


3 posted on 11/02/2017 11:48:33 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The Nation of Islam, to include Malcolm X, believes that white people were developed on a secret island by a mad scientist...


4 posted on 11/02/2017 11:48:34 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Somalia & an average IQ of 68 seems to call this conclusion into question.


6 posted on 11/02/2017 11:51:31 AM PDT by 1malumprohibitum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The Bible is true, on all levels!

The Tanakh and particularly the Torah is a holographic record of the boundary conditions the Ein Sof established for all the events in the Universe focusing on the 7000 year salvation plan. The Gematria and Equal Letter Skip (ELS) coding tell us of the importance of the ending of Hebrew year 5777 and the start of Hebrew year 5778.

For me, the key verse is not in the Torah, but in the “Tweets” of King Solomon. Wisdom is explaining the creation of the world, and she says:

PRO8:27 When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:

God. KING JAMES BIBLE TOUCH - KJV (Kindle Locations 26322-26323). Kindle Edition.

This verse tells us that the Ein Sof used the “Laws of Form” revealed to George Spencer-Brown around 1957 to create the Universe by making the first distinction between inside and outside, i.e., drawing a circle on the face of the deep. This is why Genesis starts with Bet.

The Law of Forms provide the foundation for the Universe as an accounting system based on complex whole numbers. It explains why naming is important to the Ein Sof. Introduces the concept of the cross, as in crossing a boundary. It explains memory (and Elohim remembered Noah), oscillation (there was evening and there was morning), and mapping. Everything needed to support the Salvation Plan: “And Abraham believed Elohim and it was accounted to him as righteousness.”

Since it takes at least two dimension to form a boundary, the Law of Forms explains why Burkhard Heim, in 1948, assumed quantization of area, he was able to drive a seventh degree equation which describe the Universe as starting as three spheres, or as the Sages say, three books.

So we stand at the point in history when knowledge has increased so that we can understand how the Ein Sof made the world, and that it is quite literal to say that He did it by writing the Torah and that the Tanakh records the final vessel that the Potter crafted.

DAN12:04 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

God. KING JAMES BIBLE TOUCH - KJV (Kindle Locations 35487-35488). Kindle Edition.

The Book of Daniel has been unsealed. The wise would do well to heed its prophetic warnings.


7 posted on 11/02/2017 11:53:14 AM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

If you allow yourself to become a ward of the state when you don’t have to be one then you are in the same league as a pet! You will give paw, lay down and vote as you are told. That to me makes some people more primitive than I am.


8 posted on 11/02/2017 11:54:25 AM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

This is true. During the 1860s and before, there was something called the “two creations theory” in the South. It was preached from pulpits in the slave owning areas and was basically meant to justify slavery by asserting that non-whites were inferior and created in a separate creation to serve whites. They used the fact that Genesis has two creation accounts to justify this.

This also meant that the Africans weren’t quite human and therefore didn’t have to be or actually couldn’t be baptized (there were some counties in Georgia that had the death penalty, never carried out, for missionaries evangelizing the African slaves).

Our bishop in my Southern town went to the First Vatican Council (held in the 1860s but never formally ended until recently because of the invasions related to Italy’s internal struggles) to preach against the two creations theory and get a vote on it. The theory was virtually unknown in Europe and the rest of the bishops had no idea what our bishop was talking about, so it never even came to a vote.

But yes, scientific research does support the idea that there was only one Creation of humanity.


9 posted on 11/02/2017 11:57:39 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Ruh-roh! Don't tell the liberals; they're convinced that literalist young earth creationism is to blame for "white racism!"

Don't tell the "palaoes;" they'll accuse of of "virtue signaling" and "selling out western civilization!"

And don't tell the Catholics/Eastern Orthodox/Miaphysites/Nestorians; Charles Darwin is a big saint to them.

10 posted on 11/02/2017 11:58:31 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Vegam Yehudah tillachem biYrushalayim . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Darwin never met a millenial democrat..............


12 posted on 11/02/2017 12:06:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Even Darwin himself proposed that darker-skinned human populations were more primitive.

Now where do you suppose he got that rediculous idea?




13 posted on 11/02/2017 12:06:39 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Well, I try to agree with this writer.

Then I notice that people who are White like I am, are being blamed for being evil because of their skin color. Some groups are certain this writer is wrong.

Laws that were devised since the creation of our nation, most of which are recognized as the best humanity had to offer on planet Earth, are discredited due to the skin color of the authors.

What this means, is that groups of people are buying into the idea that incarceration for crimes that were proven to have been committed, are somehow unfair. You’re in prison for murder. Is that fair? How about rape, armed robbery, simply shooting and almost killing someone, should you be in prison? Well, according to some people, it depends on your skin color.

How about being responsible? Does that have a bigger impact on your community than Whites who supposed hate you and have determined to make things hard on you? Do men who father children and then don’t stick around, wreak havoc on their children’s lives and the community at large? Some would tell you it’s evil even to ask this question.

The universal language of Math has now come under attack based on the idea the basic truths of the universe are being racially gamed by Whites.

As people come up with this nonsense, I observe, and have to allow for there actually being a difference in ability based on skin color.

I have to admit also, that there are some folks with my own skin color who are advancing some of these sordid ideas.

I also have to admit that there are many people with a different color of skin than my own, who also recognize the sheer idiocy of some of these arguments.

It is their world view that causes me to sustain my belief that there are good people in each race on Earth.

I salute them the same as I salute people of my own racial grouping.

To be honest, my opinion of people is not based on skin color. It is based on how they perform as human beings.


14 posted on 11/02/2017 12:07:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Darwin was mistaken—no people group is more primitive than another.

If this is true then why were Europeans living in buildings with cities while Africans of the same time period were living in collections of mud huts despite having MORE natural resources to draw from?

16 posted on 11/02/2017 12:13:37 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (We need a separation of press and state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

bump


31 posted on 11/02/2017 12:31:20 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

We should live with our own natural kind.

It’s what the Foumfers wanted...that’s why thy placed ‘uniform rule of naturalization” in the Constitution.

Congress only immigration and citizenship is keeping USA the same natural kind.


46 posted on 11/02/2017 1:26:04 PM PDT by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Darwin was mistaken—no people group is more primitive than another.

Darwin was not considering BEHAVIOR.

55 posted on 11/02/2017 2:09:09 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Oddly, the article that ICR seems to be referencing and which was released on October 12, 2017, doesn’t particularly reflect the creationist conclusions. Genes responsible for diversity of human skin colors identified. A portion of the study dealing with the age of some gene variations are quoted: “The team saw evidence that this region of the genome has been a strong target of natural selection outside of Africa; mutations associated with light skin color swept to nearly 100 percent frequency in non-Africans, one of few examples of a "selective sweep" in all Eurasians; the age of the selective sweep was estimated to be around 60,000 to 80,000 years old, around the time of migration of modern humans out of Africa. One additional takeaway from this work is a broader picture of the evolution of skin color in humans. Most of the genetic variants associated with light and dark pigmentation from the study appear to have originated more than 300,000 years ago, and some emerged roughly 1 million years ago, well before the emergence of modern humans. The older version of these variants in many cases was the one associated with lighter skin, suggesting that perhaps the ancestral state of humans was moderately pigmented rather than darkly pigmented skin.“
62 posted on 11/02/2017 3:11:29 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

God created one human race. He didn’t say what color their skin was, because it doesn’t matter.

All racial differences are the result of local adaption and population isolation.

As populations increasingly interact, the racial differences will disappear. And the racial grievance industry will be out of business.


65 posted on 11/02/2017 6:33:21 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Which ‘Biblical Narrative’ is being confirmed.

At the end of Genesis 1, Moses penned from the Creator, that the Creator rested on the 7th day. Now, of course, Peter tells us how the Creator measures time in II Peter 3: 8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

The days of creation were thousand of years, and at the end of 7 thousand years, Moses penned this...

Genesis 2: 4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,

5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, ****and there was not a man to till the ground.*****

How is it that if every one is claimed to have come from the Genesis 1 creation, could it be, there was NO man to till the ground on the 8 day?

History records the ‘age’ of the hunter/gathers before ‘farming’ came on the scene.

The Bible narrative from Genesis through Revelation repeatedly teaches, there were two different days of ‘creation’ of flesh humans. Something that never gets addressed is that we are NOT told when the Creator created all souls/spirit intellect’... And Moses pens that the flesh man Adam was not living until the ‘breath of life’ which means soul, was breathed into his nostrils.

By the way what does the name Adam mean in the Hebrew?

Further, Noah was elected because he and his family were ‘perfect in their generations’.... 8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.

9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.

Why was there a flood?

Genesis 6

2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

Amos 8:11 11Behold, the days come, saith the LORD God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD:

That famine is global... and God said He would send it.

72 posted on 11/03/2017 9:17:20 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson