Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The tragic plight of Germans in AMERICA during the First World War I
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 10/18/2017 | Harvey Day

Posted on 10/18/2017 9:20:01 AM PDT by Jewbacca

A fascinating collection of photos have resurfaced showing the hardships faced by German-Americans at the brutal height of the First World War. As Europe was ravaged by fighting, German immigrants in the US suffered harassment, internment, lynchings - and even the humiliation of being tarred and feathered.

Although a little-remembered part of history today, America was wracked by the fear and paranoia that swept from coast to coast during the Great War.

The United States declared war on Germany in April 1917 and helped lead the Allies to victory. But before that, many Americans were terrified of the German threat growing on the other side of the world.

This collection of pictures reveals the full extent of war hysteria and open hostility towards all things German that erupted across the nation.

Before the war broke out, America had welcomed German immigrants and regarded them highly. German was the second most widely spoken language in the country and there were over 100 million first and second-generation German-Americans living in the United States, with many of them involved in the thousands of German organizations across the country.

The United States embraced them and the German language became an established part of the high school curriculum.

But when the war broke out and Germany became the enemy of the Allies abroad, the American government began calling on its people to reject their German-American neighbors.

President Woodrow Wilson declared that German-Americans were to be treated as 'alien-enemies' and that they should reject their German identity if they were to be accepted in US society.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chatforum; germany; history; homosexualagenda; naziprussianhunter; secondreich; wilson; wwi; zimmermantelegram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-298 next last
To: Olog-hai

Do you deny that it was shipping weapons to Britain? Do you deny that the German embassy warned passengers in advance of this fact?


101 posted on 10/18/2017 10:33:22 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The sources that claim the Lusitania was transporting armaments date from the 1970s and much later. Noel Marshall’s claims are dubious, and Saul David’s credibility is questionable at best.


102 posted on 10/18/2017 10:33:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Then there were the Polish Pilots of 303rd who saved their bacon during the Battle of Britain, only to be sold out to Stalin in the end.


103 posted on 10/18/2017 10:34:50 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

Yes, I deny it, as well as the credibility of sources such as Saul David and Noel Marshall, the latter of whom was casting aspersions when viewing a UK government paper warning divers exploring the wreck of risks “to life and limb”.

The Cruiser Rules were clear, and the Second Reich clearly had no regard for them, further cementing their rogue entity status. There were indeed a number of Q-ships that had on-board guns, but the Lusitania had none.


104 posted on 10/18/2017 10:36:18 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

German Americans in WW1; Japanese, German and Italian Americans in WW2; blacks, Jews and Catholics under the KKK.

The COMMON THREAD???

DEMOCRATS!!!!


105 posted on 10/18/2017 10:37:18 AM PDT by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; Olog-hai
" There were ways to avenge the Lusitania that didn’t necessarily involve going to war."

Avenge what?

The passengers of the Lusitania were warned by newspaper ads that they would be sailing into a war zone......German intelligence had found out the Lusitania would be carrying war materials (violation of US neutrality).......there were two explosions reported but only one torpedoe fired!!!!!

For decades the UK navy would NOT allow diving on or near the wreck. Is that because it would confirm the German version that the Lusitania was carrying war materials?

Yes the US had NO business getting into WWI!!! Doing so was to save the NY bankers, who had loaned millions to Britain/France!!

106 posted on 10/18/2017 10:38:27 AM PDT by crazy scenario ( Remember me, I'm a fixer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Yet we never hear about tea sipping surrender monkeys.

The winners get to write the history books.

107 posted on 10/18/2017 10:39:26 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
That is argumentum ad verecundiam to say “no historian anywhere”, especially without citing any historians anywhere. The Second Reich used the term “Reich” to refer to itself, and for Adolf to declare a Third, that certainly indicates a Second that preceded it.

So far, the only assertion of “munitions” comes from left-wing “historians” and other figures, and that still does not give weight to any one-sided German claims that the UK was violating the Cruiser Rules.
108 posted on 10/18/2017 10:40:39 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Again, you are wrong. One of the great challenges Wilson faced in his efforts to get America into the war was the Monroe doctrine.

It was seen throughout our government as a separation between the old world and new world. Unless someone attacked America, we also were secure that idiotic European wars did not involve us. The part of the Monroe doctrine you are referring to was intended to keep European wars from spilling over to the Americas.

It worked well until Wilson wanted to jump into a European war.


109 posted on 10/18/2017 10:41:30 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
110 posted on 10/18/2017 10:42:01 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Was it? I’m looking at all the sources that claim it did, and they seem to all be on the left. Torpedo impacts would have set off such munitions, besides, but it was only the torpedo damage that sank the ship.


111 posted on 10/18/2017 10:42:47 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF

“Unrestricted submarine warfare violated maritime law.”

So was a blockaid of neutral shipping. The Royal Navy forbade any neutral American ship from entering a German port.

But that is the story of WWI propaganda. Brits can do any violation they please. The Germans are wanton war criminals.


112 posted on 10/18/2017 10:45:43 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Lusitania divers warned of danger from war munitions in 1982, papers reveal

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/01/lusitania-salvage-warning-munitions-1982

Now who was leading Britain in 1982?


113 posted on 10/18/2017 10:46:07 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

And then someone attacked America on the Lusitania, killing 128 Americans. And nothing was done about it. Clear violation of the Cruiser Rules by Germany.

The Monroe Doctrine is not a declaration of passivity. Take note of the 1902 Venezuela crisis, which had both the German and British empires on the same side on many issues.


114 posted on 10/18/2017 10:46:35 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

If I recall correctly, Eisenhower, Nimitz and Halsey were of German ancestry.


115 posted on 10/18/2017 10:46:49 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
" how he had to fight all the time for some years because he was German. The hatred started in WW I took a long time to subside."

It has never subsided!!

116 posted on 10/18/2017 10:49:28 AM PDT by crazy scenario ( Remember me, I'm a fixer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I was reading that article, and nothing was specified about munitions. The phrases “something startling” and “danger to life and limb” were given hyperbole expansion by the left.
An urgent Whitehall search of the records was ordered. The Ministry of Defense said they could find no evidence to substantiate the rumors of a secret munitions store. …
Thirteen paragraphs in. As usual, innuendo and one-sided sourcing from the Manchester Guardian.
117 posted on 10/18/2017 10:51:16 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Another Brit betrayal.

And everyone forgets, the first hundred years of our nation the Brits waited for any opportunity to destroy our republic. It wasn’t until they could find a soft headed president like Wilson and harness our power for their goals that we suddenly had a “special friendship”.

Even in WWII the Brits were more concerned about preserving their empire than killing off the Nazis and Jap nations. Our men in the China/Burma/India theater were very convinced of this. So were our guys in the Mediterranean.


118 posted on 10/18/2017 10:52:23 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
So was a blockaid of neutral shipping.

The difference is the British and other belligerents, both in the Entente and Central Powers never engaged in unrestricted, unprovoked attacks against neutral shipping. The Entente naval forces boarded and searched neutral ships and turned them away. The didn't just sneak up and pump a torpedo into them.

Germany's practice was wrong.

119 posted on 10/18/2017 10:52:50 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (Dump Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF

The Germans didn’t exactly “sneak up”, they announced their plans ahead of time and gave fair warning.


120 posted on 10/18/2017 10:54:49 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson