Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tropical forests used to protect us from climate change. A new study says now making it worse.
Washington Post ^ | September 8, 2017 | by Chris Mooney

Posted on 09/28/2017 12:27:01 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

A surprising scientific study released Thursday presents troubling news about the enormous forests of the planet’s tropical midsection — suggesting that they are releasing hundreds of millions of tons of carbon to the atmosphere, rather than storing it in the trunks of trees and other vegetation.

The results contradict prior work in suggesting that these forests — including the Amazon rain forest - have become another net addition to the climate change problem. However, the accounting also implies that if the current losses could be reversed, the forests could also rapidly transform into a powerful climate change solution.

“The losses due to deforestation and degradation are actually emitting more CO2 to the atmosphere, compared with how much the existing forest is able to absorb,” said Alessandro Baccini, the lead author of the study and a researcher at the Woods Hole Research Center.

That result was definitely puzzling to Guido van der Wank, a scientist at VU Amsterdam who studies global forest fires and forest changes using satellite and other techniques.

“If you consider that they have not taken emissions from degradation of tropical peatlands — as is happening in Indonesia and is a considerable source — into account the pictures becomes even more out of tune with our current understanding,” he said by email. “The authors provide a discussion of potential reasons behind the discrepancy but, if correct, the work certainly challenges the way we account for the global flows of carbon between various reservoirs and places on earth.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climatechangefraud; co2; deforestation; fakescience; globalism; globalwarming; hoax; rainforest; socialism; tropicalforests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2017 12:27:01 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Study” is now defined as “propaganda”.


2 posted on 09/28/2017 12:28:02 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Jeff Bezos’s head should be photoshopped on that graphic.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 12:30:16 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It is always humans.

So says those selling carbon credits.

Always follow the money.

thank you.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 12:35:44 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So, trees aren’t our friends?

OMG.


5 posted on 09/28/2017 12:35:48 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Quick, CUT THEM ALL DOWN!!!!


6 posted on 09/28/2017 12:36:29 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It matters not what the study says, I keep trees near my house and neighborhood.


7 posted on 09/28/2017 12:39:33 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ping.


8 posted on 09/28/2017 12:39:33 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Gosh, I thought the science was settled!


9 posted on 09/28/2017 12:44:47 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Considering that we are more likely in the beginning of a new Dalton or Maunder Minimum, we need all the CO2 we can get in the atmosphere. General cooling will restrict agriculture and reduce the amount of food. There will be n on-political famines once again. Artificially reducing the carbon content of the atmosphere will make the famine worse. I guess the Left would get their population reduction and food prices would rise.


10 posted on 09/28/2017 12:45:44 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I know! I know!

Let’s kill all the people except George Soros and his friends and their servants so they can live in the Walden paradise they deserve!


11 posted on 09/28/2017 12:46:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This makes sense.

Plant life requires CO2 to grow. If there isn't enough, then other plants may emit more in order to facilitate growth.

12 posted on 09/28/2017 12:48:54 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Guido van der Wank”

NOT a cartoon character.


13 posted on 09/28/2017 12:49:31 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I thought it was well known that trees breathe, i.e. absorb carbon during the day and emits part of it at night, and decaying plant matter emits CO2 and CH4, because bacteria too have metabolism.
This is not news and certainly not cause for alarm.

14 posted on 09/28/2017 12:55:00 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Plants absorb CO2 and emit oxygen. Now some plants will decide to emit CO2? What? Run that by me again!


15 posted on 09/28/2017 12:55:46 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Doo-doo-doo, da-da-do-do-wow!
There’s a place called the rainforest that truly sucks ass
Let’s knock it all down and get rid of it fast
You say ‘save the rainforest’, but what do you know?
You’ve never been to the rainforest before!
Getting Gay with Kids is here
To tell you things you might not like to hear
You only fight these causes ‘cos caring sells
All you activists can go ____ yourselves.

Someday if we work hard boys and girls..
There’ll be no more rainforests left in the entire world..
Getting Gay with Kids is here
To spread the word, and bring you cheer
Getting Gay with Kids is here
Lets knock down the rainforest, whaddaya say?
Its totally gay, it’s totally gay


16 posted on 09/28/2017 12:57:29 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moovova

There is a suspicious tree looking through my kitchen window as I type!


17 posted on 09/28/2017 12:59:48 PM PDT by Leep (Less talk more ACTiON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
They are releasing hundreds of millions of tons of carbon to the atmosphere, rather than storing it in the trunks of trees and other vegetation

President Reagan said the same thing 35 years ago.

18 posted on 09/28/2017 1:12:59 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
I thought it was well known that trees breathe, i.e. absorb carbon during the day and emits part of it at night, and decaying plant matter emits CO2 and CH4, because bacteria too have metabolism.

Liberal greenies always think in black and white, not shades of gray with nuance. You can artificially reduce CO2 emissions by people, but neglect the bacteria which is everywhere and continually emitting CO2 far in excess of what humans can release. These liberals don't have compost piles? Bacteria is necessary for plants (and humans) to exist.

19 posted on 09/28/2017 1:20:55 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I thought trees emitted evil, poison carbon. Shouldn’t all trees be chopped down?


20 posted on 09/28/2017 1:37:23 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson