Skip to comments.Moving the Goal Post on Racism
Posted on 09/14/2017 11:14:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
In 1964, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. appeared on a BBC news show. The host asked King about Attorney General Robert Kennedy's prediction, an audacious one at the time, that a black man could be elected president in 40 years.
King thought it would not take that long: "There are certain problems and prejudices and mores in our society which make it difficult now. However, I am very optimistic about the future. Frankly, I have seen certain changes in the United States over the last two years that surprise me. ... On the basis of this, I think we may be able to get a Negro president in less than 40 years. I would think that this could come in 25 years or less."
It took 44 years.
The day after the election of President Barack Obama front-page stories in newspapers all over the country, including The New York Times, quoted black parents saying things like, "For the first time in my life I can truly look my child in the eye and say, yes, you could become president someday."
A tearful Jesse Jackson said he never thought he would see the day. Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a civil rights leader who marched with Dr. King, said: "I feel very grateful that I'm still here to be here during this unbelievable historic moment in our country. This is a day of thanksgiving, a night of celebration. ... It's unbelievable that we have come such a distance in such a short time, to see a young African-American man elected president of the United States."
It's difficult to overstate the significance of the election of President Barack Obama.
As recently as the 1950s, polls showed that the majority of Americans said they would never vote for a black person for president, no matter how qualified. But in 2007, then-Sen. Obama, speaking at a historically black church in Alabama on the 42nd anniversary of the Selma march, talked about our country's great progress in race relations. America, according to Obama, is "90 percent of the way there." Obama said: "I'm here because somebody marched for our freedom. I'm here because y'all sacrificed for me. I stand on the shoulders of giants. I thank the Moses generation. But we have got to remember now that Joshua still had a job to do. ... The previous generation, the Moses generation, pointed the way. They took us 90 percent of the way there. But we (the 'Joshua generation') still got that 10 percent in order to cross over to the other side."
Now this "90 percent" occurred before Obama's election and re-election, so presumably, we carved into the remaining 10 percent. But, oh what a difference a few years makes. Two things occurred.
First, the election of a black person did not bring about the expected "hope and change." In fact, the percentage of blacks living in poverty increased under Obama. Shortly before Obama's election, a supporter at a campaign rally named Peggy Joseph famously gushed about what an Obama victory would mean: "I wouldn't have to worry about putting gas in my car. I wouldn't have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know -- if I help him, he'll help me." Well, guess what. Barbara Bush was right when she said, "Your success as a family, our success as a society, depends not on what happens at the White House but on what happens inside your house."
In 1992, the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Statistics examined the 75 most populous counties. Turns out the jury is less likely to convict a black defendant of a felony than a white defendant. The study found that "in 12 of the 14 types of crimes (felonies including murder, rape and other serious crimes) for which data was collected, the conviction rate for blacks is lower than that of whites." Similarly, in 2013, the National Institute of Justice, the research and evaluation agency of the DOJ, published their study of whether the police, as a result of racial bias, stop blacks more than other drivers. The conclusion? Any racial disparity in traffic stops is due to "differences in offending" in addition to "differences in exposure to the police" and "differences in driving patterns."
My uncle Eddie, a barber in Chattanooga, Tennessee, immersed himself in local Republican politics. He died 20 years before Obama got elected. He would've been stunned that the country of segregation in which he was born could evolve so that his nephew would see the election of a black president. But he would likely have been even more astonished at how quickly Martin Luther King's dream of a colorblind society has turned into a quest to purge the town square of Confederate statues. He would have been shocked that a group called Black Lives Matter, given credibility by the Obama administration, issued a "list of demands" of white people.
In eight years, we've gone from the election of the first black president to a call for campus "safe spaces" to combat alleged racist "microaggressions." Uncle Eddie would have called this moving the goal post.
Larry needs more exposure. He’s a good man.
Progressivism is inherently racist.
The inner city is the new plantation and progressive urban policy is The New Slavery.
Obama is a mulatto. He is not black.
If Obama had a son, he’d look like - and act like - Colin Kaepernik.
This hasn’t been about moving the goal post.
If you have a goal post, at least there is still a way kick the ball through it.
This is about taking down the goal post.
The real racists refuse to provide a way for the goal post to be accessed.
They took it down, because they want to use the racism card for the next 1000 years.
Legally blonde, not mulatto. As for the statues. Just build a protective fence around them and place barbed wire inside.
Just put snipers somewhere within half a mile.
How I wish the first black president had been a man like Herman Cain or Allen West.
Correct and factual
Cough, cough, uh huh
Col West never ran for the presidency
Yes he is.
1...now sometimes offensive : the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person
In my opinion, the Republican Party would have nominated an American “Margaret Thatcher” or a politically ambitious “Thomas Sowell” in the 1970s.
Conversely, if Thomas Sowell had been the GOP nominee in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, only 15% of American Blacks would have voted for Sowell, and only 30% of Hispanics would have voted for Sowell.
37.5% Berber Arab
His slave owning DNA is far more prevalent than his slave being DNA.
The continued existence of Whites is an act of overt racism which necessitates that Whites be erased.
- according to the prevailing ideology -
It would have been a lot less than 44 years if Gen Powell had run.
That, of course, is based on his claimed paternity. You think someone could have grabbed a glass he drank from by now and run a DNA test.
The biggest things in the turn around to our present sorry state did not get a mention.
First, Obama should not have gone on a witch-hunt for George Zimmerman. The local police had already investigated and determined, correctly, that Zimmerman acted in self-defense. Obama should have asked people to accept that.
Second: Pretty much the same thing happened in Ferguson. Obama should have urged everyone to let the investigation go forward and accept the result. He didn't. Instead, he threw gasoline on the fire.
Trevon Martin and Michael Brown both died for the same reason: they attacked men who had guns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.