Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Congresswoman on Russia: “I’m not convinced they didn’t get into [voting] machines”
Legal Insurrection ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 09/14/2017 6:14:18 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Not even Hillary Clinton, acclaimed author of What Happened, went this far.  On Wednesday's Hardball, Dem Rep. Jackie Speier called Russian "hacking" of the presidential election an "act of war." Taking things a significant step further, Speier said:

"I'm not convinced that they didn't get into the [voting] machines."

That was too much even for Chris Matthews, who interjected, "we don't know that yet. We don't know that."

View the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: 115th; chrismatthews; dopeydems; repjackiespeier; russianhacking; trumprussia; votingmachines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

They obviously got into your head......................


21 posted on 09/14/2017 6:26:21 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Oct 2016

WikiLeaks Show How Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta Became ‘Business Partners with Vladimir Putin’

“...WikiLeaks emails provide proof that the “Clintons have a long and lucrative history of financial deals with the Russians, particularly with the Russian government.”

Schweizer explained the “deep ties” the Clintons have to Russia, specifically how in 2010 then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the sale and transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government ...”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/22/schweizer-wikileaks-show-clinton-campaign-chair-john-podesta-became-business-partners-vladimir-putin/

22 posted on 09/14/2017 6:26:29 AM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

I do seem to recall the odd report of machines changing votes.


23 posted on 09/14/2017 6:26:45 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Saltmeat

Rubber boots serve a purpose...................


24 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

White House goes on offense, slams DNC, Clintons for ‘collusion’

FoxNews.com ^ | July 12, 2017 | Brooke Singman

The White House has been grappling all week with revelations of a meeting the president’s eldest son held last year with Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya, who was said to have dirt on Hillary Clinton as part of a Russian government effort to help the Trump campaign.

But Deputy White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders used Wednesday’s off-camera briefing to highlight DNC and Clinton ties to foreign governments including Russia and Ukraine.

“If we’re looking at Russia relationships with anybody, it would be directly with the Clintons,” she said, citing examples of a speech former President Bill Clinton gave in Russia for which he reportedly earned over $500,000 and reports of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton selling what Sanders described as “a third of the world’s uranium,” to Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

_______________________________________________________________________

If you haven’t seen this yet, it’s a must-see. Maria Bartiromo lays it on Clinton campaign chair John Podesta for his *genuine* ties to the Russian government...

Note: I linked to the YouTube search results for “maria bartiromo” + “podesta”, rather than a single video, as these things tend to ‘disappear’ from the popular video hosting site.

Image result for maria bartiromo podesta

Maria Bartiromo Gets into Heated Debate with John Podesta Over His Ties to Russia
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=maria+bartiromo+podesta

_______________________________________________________________

Uncovering the Russia ties of Hillary’s campaign chief

By Peter Schweizer
July 5, 2017

Lawmakers failed to seize on an alarming development in the Russia collusion story last week, one that should spark serious and immediate congressional inquiry.

But it didn’t involve President Trump or his administration.

During a heated Fox Business interview with Maria Bartiromo, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chief John Podesta made a series of misleading statements when questioned about his involvement in a company that received $35 million from the Russian government while Clinton served as secretary of state.

On Jan. 18, 2011, a small green-energy company named Joule Unlimited announced Podesta’s appointment to its board. Months later, Rusnano, a Kremlin-backed investment fund founded by Vladimir Putin, pumped $35 million into Joule. Serving alongside Podesta on Joule’s board were senior Russian official Anatoly Chubais and oligarch Ruben Vardanyan, who has been appointed by Putin to a Russian economic modernization council.

Bartiromo asked Podesta why he failed to disclose his role in Joule as required by law when he entered the White House in January 2014 to serve as counselor to President Barack Obama.

“Maria, that’s not true. I fully disclosed and was completely compliant,” Podesta shot back.

But according to his own financial disclosure form, Podesta only listed two of the three entities that made up Joule Unlimited, failing to disclose his presence on the board of the Dutch-registered Stichting Joule Global Foundation.

When Bartiromo pressed Podesta on the whereabouts of his 75,000 shares of Joule stock, Podesta resorted to Clintonesque semantics: “I didn’t have any stock in any Russian company!”

Notice the rhetorical sleight of tongue there: Joule is based in Massachusetts, not Russia, making Podesta’s statement technically true. Podesta added: “And by the way, I divested before I went into the White House.”

Yet again, it’s not that simple. WikiLeaks documents reveal that when he joined the Obama White House, Podesta transferred his Joule shares to an LLC controlled by his adult children. He also resumed communicating with Joule and Joule investors after leaving the White House and joining Clinton’s campaign. In fact, he received an invoice from his lawyers in April 2015 — a consent request for Dmitry Akhanov of Rusnano USA to join Joule’s board.

But nothing to see here, Podesta insisted.

“I was on the board of an American company that did business here and only here,” he said. “The Russian company had a small investment in that company. We can go round and around the tree.”

Was Joule’s business “here and only here” in America as Podesta claimed? Not according to Joule’s own CEO and president, Bill Sims. While thanking Putin’s Rusnano, Sims said the investment would help support “the development of our global presence” and “complements the company’s expansion plans in Europe, the Middle East, and Mexico.” Moreover, Stichting Joule is itself an overseas entity. Indeed, Rusnano’s investment in Joule was in part to develop a manufacturing facility in Russia.

And what about Podesta’s contention that Putin’s investment fund represented a “small investment” in Joule? In 2012 the company claimed it had raised $110 million to date.

That meant the Kremlin-backed $35 million investment given to Joule after Podesta’s board appointment represented over 30 percent of Joule’s outside financing.

There’s also this inconvenient fact: In 2016, Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, where Joule board member Reuben Vardanyan formerly served as head of its investment banking division, had a $170,000 lobbying contract with the Podesta Group — which is owned by John Podesta’s brother, Tony Podesta.

In short, Clinton’s top campaign chief and a senior counselor to Obama sat on Joule’s board alongside top Russian officials as Putin’s Kremlin-backed investment fund funneled $35 million into Joule. No one looking at the Podesta fact pattern can claim to care about rooting out Russian collusion and not rigorously investigate the tangle of relationships.

Are US officials investigating the matter? We don’t know. When Bartiromo asked Podesta whether his closed-door session in front of the House Intelligence Committee included questions about his Russian ties and Joule, Podesta punted: “I have already told you that I was asked not to talk about specific questions, and I said I would respect that.”

After the slippery answers Podesta delivered during his explosive Fox Business interview, US officials have more reasons than ever to demand answers about John Podesta, Joule Unlimited and Putin’s Rusnano investment fund. If they weren’t investigating Podesta before, they should be now.

http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

25 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:25 AM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The seriousness of the charges only ever goes away from them.


26 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:38 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: generally

Yup.

The Soros/0bama/Clinton cheat. 4-6%


27 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:38 AM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust! 4c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Proverbs 26:11

`As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly.’

The `rats and their nevertrumpers allies have squandered enough of our tax dollars and time on this nonsense.
If Mueller & Co. refuse to show their `Man Eating Chicken’, then it’s time to shut this freak show down.


28 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:38 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

May it was:

“Hillary Clinton, a claimed author”..................


29 posted on 09/14/2017 6:27:47 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Sen. D’Amato Drops Bomb: Hillary Allowed Russia to Take Ownership of US Uranium to Sell to Iran (Video at link)

Jim Hoft
Jul 3rd, 2016

Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.

Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran!

Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”

It’s true.
In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agency’s purchase of the company “Uranium One” in Canada.

That same company, Uranium One, owned uranium concessions in the United States. Because uranium is a strategically important commodity, the Russians would need approval from the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, before the purchase took place.

Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. (Via Breitbart)

The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And then there’s this...

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries, including Iran.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/senator-damato-drops-bomb-hillary-allowed-russia-take-ownership-us-uranium-sell-iran-video/

Backup link:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170910134156/http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/senator-damato-drops-bomb-hillary-allowed-russia-take-ownership-us-uranium-sell-iran-video/

______________________________________________________________

Obama allowing Iran to purchase uranium from Russia

Daniel Horowitz | January 10, 2017

Remember those side deals Obama forged with Iran that were not part of the text of the official treaty? Now we are finding out some of the details.

Yesterday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Iranian officials confirmed they have received at least $10 billion in cash, commodities, and assets from Washington since 2013. And that is likely a conservative estimate.

But cash is not the only thing the Islamic Republic of Iran is receiving for gracing us with their willingness to sign onto our own capitulation.

The AP is reporting that Russia, with the support of President Obama, is shipping Iran 116 metric tons of natural uranium.

While Iranian officials have obviously declined to disclose the use of such uranium, AP notes that this is enough to enrich weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs:

“Despite present restrictions on its enrichment program, however, the amount of natural uranium is significant should Iran decide to keep it in storage, considering its potential uses once some limits on Tehran’s nuclear activities start to expire in less than a decade.

David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran’s nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.” ...”

See more at:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/obama-allowing-iran-to-purchase-uranium-from-russia-will-tillerson-reverse-course#sthash.guYPvONI.dpuf

____________________________________________________________________

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
___________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

30 posted on 09/14/2017 6:28:21 AM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“Be careful what you wish for” Democrats.

Anyone who follows politics KNOWS the Democrats are the premier election cheaters. They routinely falsify election results, pack ballot boxes, & illegally vote multiple times.

So, let’s hope the Justice Dept. investigates any & all evidence of vote tampering.


31 posted on 09/14/2017 6:29:37 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This halfwit purports that the Russians, using
floppy disks, managed to circumvent and eliminate
the massive DNC and CLinton CHEATING from NH
to the scheme for which SETH RICH was murdered,
in part probably by this very DNC Congresswoman.


32 posted on 09/14/2017 6:32:06 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Well Hitlery Rotten Clinton does make a lot of claims


33 posted on 09/14/2017 6:32:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No, Jackie, it wasn’t the Russians! It was the Illuminati! Or maybe the Martians!


34 posted on 09/14/2017 6:32:22 AM PDT by djpg (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Jackie Speier, on the Intelligence Committee.

What a mismatch.

If there were a conspiracy to “hack” voting machines, it is far more likely to have come from the Democrat party than from their allies, the Russian Federation. And as far as a hack goes, the vast majorities delivered for Herself from California, which provided an imaginary plurality in the popular vote, almost certainly were a Democrat operation.

A river in Egypt, for sure. Disinformation AND projection.


35 posted on 09/14/2017 6:33:16 AM PDT by alloysteel (Guilty until proven innocent, while denying defense, justice, mercy or any appeal. No pardon, ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Wow good catch

https://www.rollcall.com/news/jonestown-murders-jackie-speier-37-years


36 posted on 09/14/2017 6:34:47 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Tighten up the tinfoil hat, Jackie!

Can't you see by now that this is all BS on the demonRat's part. Putin is in the process of basically restoring the evil empire that was the Soviet Union, and then-some when you include positions in the strategic energy-rich Middle East. So the last thing on Earth that the Russians would want, now and in the past, is a strong American military. The dems couldn't be any weaker on defense. In fact Comrade Obama slashed the military, putting some critical parts of it at all-time lows. He gave away the store to Putin on missile defense and nukes when he delivered on his promised "flexibility". Meanwhile, Trump-Pence has pledged to substantially INCREASE defense spending and significantly buildup the military.

37 posted on 09/14/2017 6:38:13 AM PDT by ETL (See my FR Home page for a closer look at today's Communist/Anarchist protest groups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Somebody got into California’s voting machines, Jackie - but you’ll have to look a bit closer to home to find them.


38 posted on 09/14/2017 6:39:04 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Dear Jackie....And you’re on the intelligence committee??


39 posted on 09/14/2017 6:39:14 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Which may be why Hillary won the popular vote in Ca??

Whoops....Jackie didn't think of that...

40 posted on 09/14/2017 6:40:32 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson