Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE – Congressional Expert: North Korea Prepping EMP Catastrophe Aimed At U.S. Homefront
Breitbart ^ | May 8, 2017 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 05/08/2017 6:14:04 AM PDT by Perseverando

TEL AVIV – While the international community and news media focus on North Korean missile tests and the country’s nuclear program, one expert warned on Sunday that North Korea may be secretly assembling the capability to take out significant parts of the U.S. homeland via an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack.

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry is executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and is the chief of staff of the Congressional EMP Commission.

Speaking on this reporter’s talk radio program, Pry pointed to two North Korean satellites that are currently orbiting the U.S. at trajectories he says are optimized for a surprised EMP attack. “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” is broadcast on terrestrial radio on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM in Philadelphia and online.

Pry was referring to the KMS 3-2 and KMS-4 earth observation satellites launched by North Korea in April 2012 and February 2016 respectively.

He warned: “They are positioning themselves as sort of a nuclear missile age, cyberage version of the battleship diplomacy in my view. So that they can always have one of them (satellites) very close to being over the United States or over the United States.

“Then if a crisis comes up and if we decide to attack North Korea, Kim Jong Un can threaten our president and say, ‘Well, don’t do that because we are going to burn your whole country down.’ Which is basically what he said. I mean, he has made threats about turning the United States into ashes and he connected the satellite program to this in public statements to deter us from attacking.”

“If you wanted to win a New Korean war,” added Pry, “one of the things you would certainly consider doing is taking out the United States

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: emp; kimjongfatboy; nkempthreat; nkthreat; northkorea; nuke; preppers; shtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2017 6:14:04 AM PDT by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

i’m pretty sure he’s planning a mass buffet looking at his fat ass


2 posted on 05/08/2017 6:17:39 AM PDT by brucedickinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

They have no foolhardy intentions of slugging it out with us Toe to Toe on our terms.

instead they’ll go a symmetric.

With EBT gone and ATOms unworkable, every US city will be choked with inky clouds of billowing only smoke, the tinkle of broken glass and the screams of every Trayvon somehow SURE that This Is All Part of Whiteys’s Dastardly Plan cuz We Wuz Kangz.


3 posted on 05/08/2017 6:21:10 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

If they don’t yet have ICBM technology - how did they get those satellites into orbit?


4 posted on 05/08/2017 6:23:33 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

EMP threat is over rated via a paper by Nobel Prize physicist Jack Stienberger.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/272552-the-electro-magnetic-pulse-produced-by-a-nuclear.html


5 posted on 05/08/2017 6:26:20 AM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Rockets.

The IC in ICBM means “going between continents”.

they don’t need to go between continents to go to orbit.

Going to orbit is *easier* I am going between continents in, say, 10 minutes flat.


6 posted on 05/08/2017 6:27:03 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Two points:

1. An EMP alone is not enough to prevent retaliation against North Korea. China would have to help. Otherwise that would be suicide for North Korea.

2. America may be the strongest, but it is not the only military power which would strike back at them. If taken seriously, there is this little thing called SEATO. There would be at least a half dozen other countries North Korea would have to be ready to fight.


7 posted on 05/08/2017 6:28:04 AM PDT by bioqubit (bioqubit: Educated Men Make Terrible Slaves - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

If it’s true that these “failures” were actually successes and blowing up at the right height for an EMP attack it may be time for me to get my mylar bags to wrap my generator.


8 posted on 05/08/2017 6:28:40 AM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando
I saw General Jack Keane on one of the morning shows a couple of months ago when this new round of NK provocations was just starting up. He said the first thing we need to do is to 'shoot down those damned NK satellites.' He was pretty animated about it.

I'm reading "One Second After' now. I put it down this weekend after the first 150 pages. It was ruining my weekend.

9 posted on 05/08/2017 6:29:04 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Pretty sure the US has anti-satellite capability. If we decide to act, those two satellites will be the first to go.


10 posted on 05/08/2017 6:29:13 AM PDT by RepRivFarm ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Satellites are lighter and don’t require reentry vehicles. The launchers are also grossly impractical to use as ICBMs - they’re not mobile, large, not long-term storable, etc.

The ability to launch a satellite does mean that you’re getting close, however.


11 posted on 05/08/2017 6:29:23 AM PDT by OldGuard1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

Do we have the ability to destroy or at least disable these satellites?


12 posted on 05/08/2017 6:29:50 AM PDT by MAGA2017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

I don’t think the North Koreans have the capability to put something as heavy as one of their nukes into orbit, yet.


13 posted on 05/08/2017 6:30:34 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Yup - Neo Con fake news again, using same playbook from the run up to Iraq.

fool me once shame on you
fool me twice shame on me


14 posted on 05/08/2017 6:30:58 AM PDT by vooch (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

I’m not a rocket scientist, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn.....

An ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) is different than a satellite launch vehicle (Rocket) in subtle ways as I understand it. The guidance system and physics associated with stresses are different do to trajectory and re-entry. Apparently the ICBM is more sophisticated than the rocket to push cargo into orbit. As it was once explained to me, “the Germans, during WWII likely had the technology to put a satellite into orbit. But they used that technology to fire V2s at London instead.”

THAT said, I think the intent of your question is still very valid. Do they have the technology to actually guide and detonate a device that has been in space for several years into a strategic weapon with any sort of effectiveness. There is a lot of technology involved that I would think would be as complicated as an ICBM or more so.

I’m sure there are others that are more qualified than I to analyze validity of the supposition in this article.


15 posted on 05/08/2017 6:41:26 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

“...how did they get those satellites into orbit?”

They already have satellites in orbit. Don’t be too snarky about them not being able to launch an ICBM just yet; they will eventually succeed.


16 posted on 05/08/2017 6:42:36 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

KMS-4 (Kwangmyongsong-4 meaning Bright Star-4 or Lodestar-4 in Korean) is an earth observation satellite launched by North Korea on 7 February 2016. The launch happened after North Korea conducted a nuclear test on 6 January and as the United Nations Security Council is deciding on sanctions to be placed on the country following the nuclear test. The launch was also timed to celebrate the 74th birthday of late leader Kim Jong-il on February 16. Details on the Kwangmyongsong-4 satellite are not available, though it can be assumed that its design is similar to KMS-3-2 which carried an Earth observation camera and a 470MHz UHF radio payload to transmit patriotic songs. KMS-3-2 was reported to be three-axis stabilized and its cameras were to be used to collect still imagery as well as videos, to be downlinked via X-Band. The satellite is expected to operate for at least four years and fulfill an Earth Observation task.”

http://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=41332http://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=41332


17 posted on 05/08/2017 6:43:39 AM PDT by McGruff (The terrorists have elected to receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowybear

And you’ll fuel your generator with what? What will your generator be powering? All the control electronics in everything were zapped. Except your good old incandescent light bulbs.


18 posted on 05/08/2017 6:48:20 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Believe it or not, I brought that book with me on a vacation (!) a few years ago. Talk about catching up on your reading, yikes.

But try to buck up and finish it, because there is important info in it. There are a couple of parts that will make you cry, fair warning.

Also, if you go over to Amazon, in the reviews section, you’ll find a chat-type feature. From time to time, the author of the book himself engages with people who want to discuss it, even answering questions.


19 posted on 05/08/2017 6:53:00 AM PDT by Dana1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit

... If taken seriously, there is this little thing called SEATO....

The SEATO organization folded in June, 1977. But, a treaty like that
Isn’t needed to smack the little fat boy.


20 posted on 05/08/2017 6:55:15 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson