Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Democrats propose $2B business tax
NBC KGW-TV ^ | May 5, 2017 | by Diane Dietz

Posted on 05/05/2017 2:27:39 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Oregon’s Democratic lawmakers came up with the most detailed plan yet on Thursday for fixing the state’s wobbly budget by tapping business coffers.

House Speaker Tina Kotek would place a 0.95 percent tax on annual business sales in excess of $5 million. About 5,000 businesses would pay the new tax.

The Democrats’ gross receipts tax proposal would replace the existing corporate income tax, which produces about $1 billion in revenues a year. The new tax would take effect Jan. 1, 2018. Businesses with sales under the $5 million threshold would pay a flat $250 annual filing fee. Businesses with less than $150,000 in sales would pay nothing, according to the lawmakers.

Businesses can be expected to pass some of the costs onto consumers — research predicts about 42 percent of the cost — so the lawmakers are proposing certain provisions to protect low income and middle income Oregonians, including possibly reducing individual income tax rates, increasing the standard deduction, increasing the personal exemption credit or expanding the earned income tax credit.

Rep. Cliff Bentz, R-Ontario, a member of the tax reform committee, said he doesn’t see a justification for increasing business taxes given that voters so recently turned down a business tax proposal. Opponents, he predicted, would force the question onto next fall’s ballot, where it would fail again.

“Explain to us how we don’t charge up this hill for nothing,” Bentz said to Kotek.

“I always think it’s worth it charging up the hill for our kids,” she replied.

(Excerpt) Read more at kgw.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: economy; liberals; oregon; taxes; theft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The more plans fail, the more the planners plan.

- Ronald Reagan

1 posted on 05/05/2017 2:27:39 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This should help business :)


2 posted on 05/05/2017 2:32:34 PM PDT by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust Conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Businesses can be expected to pass some of the costs onto consumers

Are these people idiots? Of course, they will pass the cost on and not just some.

3 posted on 05/05/2017 2:36:26 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ah. The old tried and failed playbook.


4 posted on 05/05/2017 2:40:46 PM PDT by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Bye bye Nike!


5 posted on 05/05/2017 2:45:30 PM PDT by proudpapa (Trump Pence earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sticking it to Intel and Nike.
Someone should point to the empty Textronix parking lot


6 posted on 05/05/2017 2:49:05 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“I always think it’s worth it charging up the hill for our kids,” she replied.

Aw, Geez, there's the "For The Children" crap again.


7 posted on 05/05/2017 2:50:00 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

I used to work for Tektronix in Atlanta, in 1980......................


8 posted on 05/05/2017 2:53:01 PM PDT by Red Badger (Profanity is the sound of an ignorant mind trying to express itself.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog; Salvation

9 posted on 05/05/2017 2:58:26 PM PDT by KC_Lion (Proud Keeper of the Sarah Palin and New First Lady Melania Ping Lists. Let me know if you want on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Oregon ping


10 posted on 05/05/2017 3:03:57 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Say hello to President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Comrade, I’ve been fascinated by your five-year plan for the last fifteen years.” /Leon, from “Ninotchka”


11 posted on 05/05/2017 3:09:23 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oregon also wants to reduce the mortgage deduction and Portland wants to introduce a soda tax.


12 posted on 05/05/2017 3:15:30 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (It's not gun violence, it's thug violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oregon; where we stick it to the business.


13 posted on 05/05/2017 3:36:48 PM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chiefly Runamok

Oregon section of Connecticut?

New Connecticut?

Connecticut West?

West Connecticut?

Another Dead State.


14 posted on 05/05/2017 3:40:59 PM PDT by Surrounded_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That’s Oregon for ya. I lived there for 11 years and was glad to get the hell out. Pretty state, but f’d up by Portland and Eugene..


15 posted on 05/05/2017 3:46:48 PM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Sounds like Oregon has figured out a way to kill the golden goose. ☺
16 posted on 05/05/2017 4:18:44 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Who are the geniuses who say that only 42% of increased costs will be passed on to the consumers. It is always 100.

They must have degrees in economics. Only such people are stupid enough to believe such rot.


17 posted on 05/05/2017 4:27:36 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I kill you filthy Vorga.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightGeek

Not all of them. Some will leave the state and some will go out of business.


18 posted on 05/05/2017 4:30:49 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
You'd think that the realization, that you'd need to subsidize or reduce taxes on a bunch of people, if you jacked up the taxes on others, would be enough to make people rethink their plans.

nope

What they would like to do, is jack up the taxes & costs of living so much, that a large portion of the population requires gubmint handouts/subsidies to live. If the welfare class isn't large enough to vote them in and not enough new mooches are born or imported, they must make their own, brand new dependants.

Poof! Welcome to the U.K. !

19 posted on 05/05/2017 4:34:59 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeSon

Why didn’t they just legalize pot.


20 posted on 05/05/2017 4:40:44 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Nuke Bilderberg from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson