Posted on 04/11/2017 3:49:40 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Why does Roberts always have one hand under his robe...??
Put a clown in a costume and he will perform for the crowd...
Is there ever any doubt, on major court decisions, whether the libs will vote in lockstep?
Give Clinton and Obama their due.
They never made Souter, O'Connor, Warren and Kennedy mistakes.
IIRC, the ACA that became law originated in the Senate.
That silly old dusty Constitution thingy is pretty clear that taxes and other revenue bill must start in the HR.
I've never seen an explanation of this.
What an idiot. The democrats will kick and scream like babies when they don’t get their way. Maybe if he called out the babies by name he wouldn’t sound as stupid as he does.
Agreed.
The ‘partisan divide’ was created by those who openly state their desire to see our country ruined. Of course, those who oppose them are the guilty ones, right?
“in the apolitical nature of the judicial system”
Now that’s funny. That guy cracks me up.
You started it by rewiting Obamicare! Dunce!
“:^)
That's Chief Pirate to you - little boy
Roberts started it
Not only did he rewrite statutory law, he ensconced the power of the national government to force citizens to purchase a product. These precedents will remain even if Obamacare is repealed.
Repeal the 17th Amendment.
That’s how the Obama team operates. Still think they had something on him regarding the adoption of his kids to get their desired decision on Obamacare.
Now cheap Justice Roberts is worried about the scotus’ credibility.
“We, in the judiciary, do not do our business in a partisan, ideological manner”
Since when?
Yes sir...
“:^p
"No politics"? The poor lad leads a sheltered life, that one does.
If he doesn’t stop talking people are going to start referring to him as the Susan Rice of the Supreme Court.
You are correct. That bridge was crossed many years ago.
Seems like a sweeping generalization to me. Do you have any evidence of your statement? You may be right. I would assume judges have opinions, but would attempt to make their rulings without letting their prejudices effect them. It becomes harder all the time to believe that more and more judges are not swayed by politics.Especially when those nominating them are more and more political.
Seems like a sweeping generalization to me. Do you have any evidence of your statement? You may be right. I would assume judges have opinions, but would attempt to make their rulings without letting their prejudices effect them. It becomes harder all the time to believe that more and more judges are not swayed by politics.Especially when those nominating them are more and more political.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.