Posted on 04/04/2017 4:56:47 PM PDT by george76
An expensive solar road project in Idaho can’t even power a microwave most days, according to the project’s energy data.
The Solar FREAKIN’ Roadways project generated an average of 0.62 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per day since it began publicly posting power data in late March. To put that in perspective, the average microwave or blow drier consumes about 1 kWh per day.
On March 29th, the solar road panels generated 0.26 kWh, or less electricity than a single plasma television consumes. On March 31st, the panels generated 1.06 kWh, enough to barely power a single microwave. The panels have been under-performing their expectations due to design flaws, but even if they had worked perfectly they’d have only powered a single water fountain and the lights in a nearby restroom.
Solar FREAKIN’ Roadways has been in development for 6.5 years and received a total of $4.3 million in funding to generate 90 cents worth of electricity.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
That's a much, much better ROI than Nuclear Fusion.
Is the microwave on high or low?
That’s the Democrat idea of “investing in infrastructure”.
Really a hair dryer or microwave consumes an average of 1 kw/hr a day??? My understanding is that takes 1000 watts use for 1 hour to equal a kilowatt hour.
My microwave is 1200watts and gets used maybe 10 minutes daily... we don’t own a hair dryer, I think they used to be 1500 watts, not sure who spends 40 minutes drying their hair.
Who paid for it?
Silly question! You know.
And a 99% chance that those who took the money were democrats.
Who didn’t see this coming?
LENR is coming along nicely...
(See what I did there?)
Gee, you would think they could have hired a consultant or an expert of some kind who would have been able to predict this outcome, or something within a factor of ten of it, anyway.
Perhaps they used million-man math in doing their feasibility study.
Or maybe the feasibility study was done by the solar-cell sales guy.
I gotta get in on this green energy scam. They’re getting millions in govt grants and probably paying themselves pretty well to come up with failing products.
Wow, assuming a 20-year life (which is probably optimistic considering people are driving on it if it’s the one I’ve seen on TV), that’s a bargain at only $949.42/kwh!! I think I’ll stick with my un-PC power at $0.13/kwh.
Any three females.
Hey, maybe they can run the juice over to that light and they’ll have a perpetual motion machine!!
Insulation data is readily available, perhaps Arizona would have been a better location?
While this article may have a point, it sure didn’t make one.
What’s the size of the project? What are the numbers on energy that was promised as compared to what was produced?
It’s not unusual for a new type of technology to produce poorly at first. So what?
I like new technology, and I’m willing to give it some time.
If we used this methodology to critique our new fighters, we wouldn’t have any new fighters.
I don’t believe this is a ten mile stretch of highway. It’s probably a very small area where the tech is being tested.
The people bringing this along, don’t seem to have all their oars in the water. I grant you that, because I have been following this loosely for a year or more, and they aren’t exactly burning up the landscape with production and proof of concept.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.