Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler

She’s been here since she was 7 for God’s sake! Cut her a break! She had no choice in the matter and our government condoned it at the time.
I’m sure she speaks perfect American English without any accent. Why should she be deported to a country that is most likely foreign to her?
Let her stay if she chooses, I say, but let’s not allow any new illegals in. Let’s be reasonable, I say.


23 posted on 03/02/2017 2:42:27 AM PST by Concentrate (ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election. ( Pizzagate, Podt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Concentrate

If she was brought here at 7, chances are she knows the language.

She’ll be fine.

She wasn’t up there advocating for the mililtary’s benefits.

She wants as many to stay as possible.

I dont care if she was 7 DAYS old when she came.


25 posted on 03/02/2017 2:50:49 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

It’s an invasion, pure and simple. Even native-born American young people aren’t being taught to be good citizens. There is no room for any foreigner, legal or illegal, who is hostile to traditional American values in the way that we have to tolerate anti-Americanism from our native-born.


28 posted on 03/02/2017 2:54:15 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

She is here on an overstayed Visa (expired), stayed here illegally for years, THEN applied for DACA status (likely not telling about the overstayed visa). Probably three illegal acts right there.

Now, we cut her a break because she probably ‘speaks American English?’ She was using that American English to speak out against our laws, subvert our border system and to sow discontent and foment trouble for an administration that is trying to protect us from all sorts of illegals.

Yeah, I’ll cut her a break. We won’t charge her for the plane ride home, then. Otherwise, it isn’t up to me or any other American to accept others’ feelings contrary to law because it feels right.


32 posted on 03/02/2017 3:36:39 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

I have no sympathy for her. She broke our laws and encouraging others to do the same.


35 posted on 03/02/2017 3:42:41 AM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

Reasonable? Reasonable is being gracious in the fact that the CRIMINAL INVADER was here being a parasite on Society.

INstead this IDIOT CRIMINAL INVADER decided to flaunt her immigration status AND ADVOCATES more ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR.

She can die on a slow train back to the turd world she can from. How many American Citizens MUST DIE, be put to the back of the line for Government assistance, medical care, opportunities for Education spots these freaking leeches take?

HOW MANY?

Gracious is America not marching this bitch back to the border with a loaded rifle pointed at her head!


55 posted on 03/02/2017 6:23:55 AM PST by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

It is reasonable for us to enforce our laws.


62 posted on 03/02/2017 7:42:44 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

We were reasonable. She entered illegally, so the government has every right to deport her. We recognized, however, that she did not enter illegally by choice. Therefore we chose not to exercise the right to deport her, but rather allow her to remain here. As a condition of allowing her to remain, she had to pay a fee. She chose not to pay the fee. Since she broke the conditions of her amnesty, that amnesty no longer applies, and she’s being deported.

What’s so unreasonable? It’s analogous to a criminal who’s been paroled. We have every right to keep that person in prison, but have chosen not to exercise that right. The criminal is released subject to certain conditions. Violation of those conditions results in the criminal returning to prison.


63 posted on 03/02/2017 7:58:31 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Concentrate

The American people where promised in 1986 that, in exchange for compassionate treatment of illegal aliens, we would get border security. We were lied to and an invasion ensued.

Fool me once . . .


68 posted on 03/02/2017 9:00:38 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson