Ping for more winning!
Making sure that the law applies to demodogs as well as Republicans
I not really following this. Because he filed they can take out ads against him through his first term?
As things are at the moment, he can’t be blamed for doing this.
I don’t understand it. But I do accept it. Win?
This is the key.
very clever
Impressive. Donald Trump IS a Jedi Master.
Shutting down the SorozNazi sedition operation? Sounds WONDERFUL!!!!!!!!!please tell us it’s for real !
I see “Campaign Finance Reform” as unconstitutional regulations of freedom of the press (Note: “the press” is not, as the CFR statutes would have it, the Associated Press and its membership. “Freedom of the press” is the right of the people to spend their own money without limit in an effort to promote their own opinions. You have freedom of the press even if you do not own a press - yet. Because you have the right to buy one if you wanna. In fact, anyone who has a blog is engaged in the free use of a modern “press").My take on this article is that it is President Trump gaming the CFR system to his own advantage, and as a Republican I’m glad to see it. If it means that CFR steps on the toes of the perpetrators of CFR, that is poetic justice. I wish that President Trump found a way to enforce CFR so strictly that the Democrats who perpetrated CFR scream for its repeal. Thereby vindicating the four justices of SCOTUS (Scalia and Rhenquist, plus Kennedy and Thomas still sitting) who rightly dissented from McConnell v. FEC. Justice O’Connor, unfortunately, was the deciding vote for McConnell.
Absolutely genius. If the libs think they can outmaneuver DJT they are really in a world of hurt.
Playing chess.
Planned Parenthood is not gonna like this.
~~Trump 2020~~
The man is simply a genius ... carrying a switch blade. He’s out maneuvered the entire world. He hasn’t even started yet but done more good than most any administration it would take years, in less than 2 weeks. Rules and wills will surrender. There are no rules to follow when saving the world. But please, rancid progressive petrie dish slime, continue to do what you’re doing. Consider ratcheting it up a bit. Continue being the ugly psychotic hypocritical anachronisms transparent court jesters. The world is watching. You’re the best recruiting tool we could hope for, for anything but you.
President George Washington knew that while he was good, he was not a universal genius. But he had the amazing talent to *surround* himself with geniuses.
President Donald Trump seems to have the same talent.
So far, he, with the help of Republicans in the House, have done three just awe-inspiring things that are political master level stuff.
This one is the third.
The first one was the resurrection of the Holman rule:
(link shortened for sanity)
The second was a double whammy, courtesy of Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). The first bill, H.R. 26, the Regulations From the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act, will give Congress a final say on regulations with an estimated cost over $100 million through a mandatory up-or-down vote before they go into effect.
And the other one, which should be called the “enabling act” for the downsizing of government. H.R. 5, the Regulatory Accountability Act.
http://www.hoover.org/research/revolution-administrative-law
Its most important provision is the Separation of Powers Restoration Act (SOPRA). Its key provision reads that any court reviewing administrative action shall “decide de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules made by agencies.”
Under “de novo” review, the appellate court acts if it were considering the question for the first time, affording no deference to the decisions below.
Legal decisions of a lower court on questions of law are reviewed using this standard. This is sometimes also called plenary review or the “legal error” standard. It allows the appeals court to substitute its own judgment about whether the lower court correctly applied the law.
A new trial in which all issues are reviewed as if for the first time is called a trial de novo.
While it doesn’t sound like much on the surface, it legal terms it is huge. It is also exceedingly detrimental to the regulations of out of control bureaucrats who worked hand in glove with leftist NGOs.