Something we all knew, but somehow we need the state to officially confirm that someone is a person.
ping
bttt
Awesome.
btt
Maybe we can finally end this crap.
We cant have laws that say its a person but only when mom wants it. Otherwise mom can murder it.
It either a person all the time and no one can murder it, or they get charged, or it is never a person and no one gets charged with murder if an unborn is terminated.
This hogepodge we have now is compltely illogical.
It’s only a baby if you want it, I thought.
Look to Obama - His mother had an afterbirth and named it Barack Hussein Obama III. When she went to Indonesia, his name became Barry Soetoro. Just think Obama’s should have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
Last I heard, and I admit it has been a while, you took care of an ectopic pregnancy via surgery.
It’s a start...
[[Alabama Supreme Court Rules Unborn Baby is a Person]]
Really? I thought it was a bumble bee or something to be squashed before it caused problems- a real person you say? So- then, it would be murder if not allowed to breach the canal? Wha Wha What? You mean we can’t decide ‘our bodies are our own’ when we are carrying another person anymore? Wha Wha What? Really? Have the courts no compassion for our desire to have fun without consequences? Someone should organize a march on washington- with pink kitty cat hats over this- this is outrageous!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3516737/posts?page=1#1
Thanks for posting this, Brown Deer!
Ping out!
The worst fears of the uber feminists and their government allies. Keep the good news coming.
Something doesn’t ring right about this case. First of all, nobody broke the woman’s arm to force her to swallow the medicine. If she took it, it’s because she wanted to.
Second of all, fallopian tubes don’t contract and expel a baby. Uteruses do.
Third, why didn’t someone bother to an ultrasound prior to prescribing the med? Fallopian tubes can be viewed ultrasonically using a vaginal wand at the very least.
There are just too many things about this case that puzzles me and too many unanswered questions.
How old is this patient? How ignorant is she? (ie uninformed about pregnancy even at the basic level..the level of info one should get in 4th grade menstruation class)
Still, I’m glad that there is a law on the books determining the humanity of the unborn. It’s a step in the right direction and sometimes laws have to be added on till you get to where you want to be legally.
State of Alabama ping! This is good thing. This is a God thing.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
I don’t understand how the substitute “doctor” could think using a drug that causes abortion would be effective against an ectopic pregnancy. Had she really had this condition, surgery is required and usually destroys the fallopian tube along with the baby.
However encouraging it is to see a court rule in favor of considering the life of the unborn child, the mother must “choose” to want the child and that still determines the legality of the issue. Recognizing the personhood of the unborn and her/his right to life should be REGARDLESS of the mother’s choice. THAT is the real issue.
