Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pardon the interruption: Clinton allegation may force Obama to act; Clinton to admit
The Hill ^ | December 27, 2016 | David Weisberg

Posted on 12/27/2016 12:14:32 PM PST by McGruff

Executive orders barring offshore drilling in most U.S. Arctic waters; an abstention at the U.N. permitting the Security Council to declare all Israeli settlement activity to be illegal and an obstacle to peace; the possibility of further action at the U.N. to formalize the administration’s comprehensive vision of a two-state solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict—Pres. Obama is sprinting, not jogging, to the finish-line.

In dashing through his last few weeks in office, will one of Pres. Obama’s final acts be to pardon Hillary Clinton for any violations of federal law she might have committed while she was secretary of state?

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; hillarypardon; obama; pardon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
We should first note that the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute Mrs. Clinton would not bind the Trump administration. Until relevant statutes of limitations have expired, she could still be prosecuted by the new administration. It is possible in my opinion for Clinton to be prosecuted for either her improper handling of classified information on “home brew,” or allegations of “pay to play” arrangements between the secretary of state and donors to the Clinton Foundation, which could constitute bribery.
1 posted on 12/27/2016 12:14:32 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Obama is sprinting, not jogging, to the finish-line.

I guess that's one way to describe a lame duck doing as much damage as possible before being evicted.

2 posted on 12/27/2016 12:16:47 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Obama will Pardon everyone in the Prison System first


3 posted on 12/27/2016 12:16:48 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

How about treason. Clinton, Obama, McCain, Boehner.


4 posted on 12/27/2016 12:16:51 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

The acceptance of a pardon is a tacit admission of guilt.


5 posted on 12/27/2016 12:17:53 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I don’t think you can get a pardon until you’e actually been convicted, or at least indicted, but I could be wrong


6 posted on 12/27/2016 12:20:42 PM PST by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspirations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Nixon was pardoned, without indictment or conviction.


7 posted on 12/27/2016 12:24:05 PM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Yeah - we’ve talked about this a lot: See Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon.


8 posted on 12/27/2016 12:24:23 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Exactly, a determination not to prosecute (whether Hillary or illegal aliens) would not be binding on the Trump Administration. Only by issuing a presidential pardon could Obama protect Hillary from future federal prosecution (although not for prosecution by a state for a violation of state law).

In the case of illegal aliens, Obama can’t pardon them because a president only can pardon someone for past (federal) crimes, and illegal aliens continue to commit federal crimes every day that they stay in the country illegally, so Obama can’t do anything to stop the Trump Administration from deporting illegal aliens (or to prosecute them criminally, for that matter). Perhaps the best way to ensure that once an illegal alien is deported he isn’t allowed back in is if the DOJ obtains convictions against them for federal crimes, or a plea bargain in return for a guilty plea, with the felons being released on probation with the condition that they would be violating the terms of their probation were they to step foot inside the United States again without a visa or similar legal permission. Any “sanctuary city” that failed to turn over to the feds evidence that a person that they stopped was violating his or her federal probation would be in a world of hurt.


9 posted on 12/27/2016 12:24:39 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

Ford pardoned Nixon precluding prosecution, so there is precedent.


10 posted on 12/27/2016 12:24:51 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
I don’t think you can get a pardon until you’e actually been convicted, or at least indicted, but I could be wrong

Then explain Nixon's pardon.

11 posted on 12/27/2016 12:25:34 PM PST by 03A3 (The reset is gonna be epic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

“Nixon was pardoned, without indictment or conviction.”

Right, and without ever accepting guilt for anything ....


12 posted on 12/27/2016 12:25:50 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Even if pardoned, or statutes of limitations pass expiration, or whatever shields are enacted - there remains the issue of a major national security breach, which MUST be investigated to identify what happened, what damage was caused, and how to prevent such from happening again.

She might “get away with it”, but her reputation can be irreparably harmed by a proper investigation of objective facts, and others involved can deliver justice by their own means.


13 posted on 12/27/2016 12:25:54 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

You need not be indicted or charged to be pardoned. Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, who had not been charged with anything at that point. The Presidential pardon power is absolute and extends to all offenses against the United States, including Treason. However, under Article 2, Section 2, the Presidential Pardon power does not extend to Impeachment.


14 posted on 12/27/2016 12:26:04 PM PST by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

It doesn’t matter. They can still investigate her whether she’s been pardoned or not. That means calling them in for testimony and depositions were simply not showing up isn’t going to fly with our incoming Justice Department.

Just think of all the opportunities for Hillary to obstruct justice and perjure herself.


15 posted on 12/27/2016 12:26:53 PM PST by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

If he pardons her she’s done.In fact,they’re both done.If she were to ask for one he’d probably grant it.If she told him she was opposed he probably wouldn’t.However,his *own* self interest could be a factor...assuming that granting,or not granting,a pardon might help,or damage,him in some way.


16 posted on 12/27/2016 12:27:32 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

17 posted on 12/27/2016 12:27:55 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Maybe, but I think if challenged in court it would not stand as Ford is no longer President. Any legal scholars can enlighten up?


18 posted on 12/27/2016 12:29:20 PM PST by gr8eman (Keep Winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
How about treason. Clinton, Obama, McCain, Boehner.

IF you're going to add The CryBaby Boehner then you'll need to add Lyin' RINO Ryan and McConJob along with Harry Reid and Nancy.

Now That I can live with

19 posted on 12/27/2016 12:29:25 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

It is obvious that the Ahole in Chief is acting against American interests and should be called out for these indescetions by Republicans. What a jag.


20 posted on 12/27/2016 12:32:12 PM PST by Navin Johnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson