Skip to comments.
Ohio (Trump) presidential elector resigns, blames 'political bullying'
Columbus Dispatch ^
| 19 Dec 16
| Robert Wang
Posted on 12/19/2016 9:42:45 AM PST by xzins
State Rep. Christina Hagan, R-Marlboro Township, indicated that she will resign as a presidential elector after two residents over the weekend filed an emergency lawsuit alleging that the Ohio Constitution prohibits a state legislator from serving as a presidential elector.
It is unfortunate that the extreme left has engaged in what is the most obvious display of partisan and extreme political bullying that can occur, said a post on Hagans Facebook page late Sunday night. I however will gladly resolve any potential frivolous lawsuits from moving forward by resigning my opportunity to Chair and cast a vote as a member of the Electoral College in order to ensure no delay in the official election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at dispatch.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: elector; oh2016; ohio; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: pburgh01
I say go after the Clinton and Obama crime families and their media liars. Crimes against the constitution and inalienable rights deserve serious punishment.
41
posted on
12/19/2016 10:06:41 AM PST
by
Neoliberalnot
(Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
To: xzins
I should know the constitutional requirement here in Ohio, but I dont. Theres no US Constitutional requirement that she is violating.
If you know the US Constitutional requirement, then you know the Ohio requirement. SCOTUS long ago ruled that states may not add to the qualifications of federal officials.
42
posted on
12/19/2016 10:07:58 AM PST
by
SSS Two
To: Responsibility2nd
Not sure if they will replace her. They are voting as we speak.
To: Reno89519
44
posted on
12/19/2016 10:08:54 AM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is public enemy #1)
To: outofsalt
Good for her for doing the expedient thing.
45
posted on
12/19/2016 10:08:57 AM PST
by
day10
(You'll get nothing and like it!)
To: doug from upland
William Jefferson Clinton is an elector from New Yawk.
46
posted on
12/19/2016 10:10:01 AM PST
by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Malsua
I’m not native to the area, we are recent acquaintances via her brother.
I think she did the right thing...and funny the clowns waited until now to bring it up.
To: day10
wow... she can represent me!
48
posted on
12/19/2016 10:11:09 AM PST
by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
To: Mears
I know. I was responding to a poster who said she should not stand aside.
49
posted on
12/19/2016 10:11:28 AM PST
by
MortMan
(The white board is a remarkable invention. Chalk one up for creativity!)
To: Reno89519
Read the article. She was probably on shaky legal grounds under the Ohio constitution.
50
posted on
12/19/2016 10:13:18 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: TexasFreeper2009
I cannot confirm or deny that the very same thought went through my head. I, of course, only posted the photo in the interest of full disclosure. :-)
51
posted on
12/19/2016 10:14:23 AM PST
by
day10
(You'll get nothing and like it!)
To: Brilliant
Ohio appoints five alternates to their slate of electors, so I'm sure she will be replaced.
The first alternate is the guy who ran Trump's campaign in Ohio.
52
posted on
12/19/2016 10:14:25 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: day10
53
posted on
12/19/2016 10:15:38 AM PST
by
outofsalt
( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
To: Alberta's Child
Read the article.”
Pfft....this is Free Republic! :)
To: Alberta's Child
Actually, per the article the suit says a Supreme Court decision ruled that electors are a state office. So I don’t see how this suit was even drawn up.
55
posted on
12/19/2016 10:16:49 AM PST
by
sharkhawk
(GO CUBS GO)
To: doug from upland
The plaintiffs seem to be correct. They are not objecting on Federal/constitutional grounds, but under Ohio law. The article quotes an Ohio statute that says its presidential electors may not "hold any public office under the United States, or this state, or a political subdivision thereof."
That seems pretty clear to me, but I'd be curious to see what Ohio Freepers and lawyers might say.
56
posted on
12/19/2016 10:16:59 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: sharkhawk
Actually, per the article the suit says a Supreme Court decision ruled that electors are a state office. Exactly -- which would make this woman ineligible to serve as an elector under Ohio law, which prohibits any public office holder from serving as an elector.
57
posted on
12/19/2016 10:18:36 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: ConservativeDude
58
posted on
12/19/2016 10:19:09 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: xzins
If her serving is prohibited by law, how is it bullying to have it pointed out? The word bullying is becoming to overused.
To: SSS Two
Whatever the law, they are now showing all 18 Ohio electors have been recorded for Trump.
It’s possible they could consider a state elector not to be a federal official.
60
posted on
12/19/2016 10:19:53 AM PST
by
xzins
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson