Posted on 11/17/2016 6:29:22 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
They wanted it to look like Trump supporters were behind the hate crime...
Two freshmen at Northwestern University were charged with vandalizing the campus church.
The two Jewish students painted a Swastika and “Trump” on the church walls....
Both students admitted the vandalism in statements given to university police...
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Idiots. There are other people right now who would gladly exterminate the Jews, they are called ISIS.
More George Soros activities?
You’d think by now someone at a university would get a clue that all hate speech attacks are hoaxes. It’s obvious that those in charge are hoping the attacks are true.
This is my surprised face
During the election, when a pro-Trump student wrote “Trump” in chalk on the sidewalk and it was played up as a hate crime. Is writing Trump in paint on the wall a hate crime if its perpetrated by a Leftist? Is it really just about who writes “Trump” — a liberal or conservative?
"Brilliant!"
Ah, for the good old days when the phrase “Not My President” was considered racist.
Wait. That was two weeks ago.
The little effers at the New York Times will ‘miss’ this story... So will Chris Matthews...
Convict them and give them 2 years in jail.
Time to start making these hoaxers famous. Document the heck out of them. Post photos , names, and the “crime” far and wide for the world to see.
Throw their sorry butts out of school and into jail.
The Jewish Defence League really needs to do a better job of educating these misguided jewish kids. They have been indoctrinated to believe the lies of the PLO and Hamas.
Let’s pretend for a moment that the absurd logic behind so-called ‘hate crimes’ is sound, and that some murders are indeed, worse than others, rather than equal murders. That would mean ‘hate crime’ supporters believe that its a serious matter, to be taken seriously.
Does logic not follow, that faux ‘hate crimes’ are particularly despicable since it marginalizes their logic just discussed above? Wouldn’t, if their truly is such a thing as a ‘hate crime’, justice dictate that the penalties for fake ‘hate crimes’ be so strict that no one would ever dare to desecrate libtard logic thusly? Shouldn’t the lesbian that is caught painting “God Hates Fags” on her own door as an attention whore receive the same, or worse, penalty dished out to the person that would actually paint such a thing ?
This is happening more and more, and of course the media reports the graffiti etc, but never reports it was the left which did this in the first place.
That's because there's now a full on rebellion at the usual "MSM" outlets. The Truth = Lies, and "Lies = Truth." Especially with respect to Trump. They are engaged in a Propaganda War.
Their policy is to report ONLY pro-Left stories, ignore stories that make the Left look bad (99%), and report the 1% of stories that make the Right look like "racists, xenophobes, haters, etc."
Should be obvious, as the “false flag” was working in favor of the Hillary Clinton propaganda narrative.
http://www.unz.com/article/trump-the-anti-semite/
Or it’s time for everyone to start seeing things, as they actually are, without the propaganda glasses on.
I see the hate of leftists projected onto conservatives, and somehow miss the incidents of conservatives expressing hate via vandalism, rioting, and the shouting down those with a different point of view.
Am I turning a blind eye to conservatives’ hate?
What evidence is there that these two fellas are lefties?
(And this event took place back in March, I believe.)
By the way, there are a handful of websites which have taken a stab at accumulating news stories of false flag and hoax acts of vandalism, beatings, and so on. They need to be supported and improved and given more attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.