Posted on 11/08/2016 1:17:24 PM PST by Kevin in California
OK, we are obviously a technologically advanced country which is why we use electronic voting machines. The problem is they are compromised and subject to voter fraud which we see in every election cycle.
Why don't we use the election ink on the index finger? This would all but eliminate any voter fraud with poll watchers present.
I don't get it....
We should ALL use paper ballots in FEDERAL elections................
You sure do post a lot of stupid vanities.
Post ‘em as News, too.
What the hell is wrong with you?
That would infringe on my right to not vote, don’t ya think?
I think you answered your own question.
You answered your own question - “This would all but eliminate any voter fraud with poll watchers present.” The rats would never allow it. Without the fraud they lose.
Coz It Would Make Sense?
LOL!! You answered your own question. Because it prevents voter fraud!
I suggested the same thing about a month ago. The purple finger with a nice dark dye that cannot be washed off for days would be VERY helpful. Especially for those bus loads of people the dems drive from poll to poll.
It’s like it’s too easy. Not sophisticated enough.
Awwww...sorry I hurt your feelings. Shall I call a waaaaaaaaaaambulance for you?
Because the Dems would invent some super duper cleaner to take the ink off.
Having answered your own question, here are a few additional comments. First, the demodummies couldn’t cheat. Without voting machines, we would have to cut more trees which we all know I against liberals “save the planet” agenda. Then, there is the issue of absentee voting which IMO needs to be completely eliminated. Geeeeesh, I could go on and on but, since you have already answered your own question, I will step aside and allow someone to add a few more generalities to the reason.
It’s like it’s too easy. Not sophisticated enough.
No. It is deliberate. Democrats have been adamantly opposed to any measure to prevent voter fraud for decades. Similarly, they have enthusiastically supported every measure to make voter fraud easier.
For decades.
What right? There is no right to vote.
Easy to understand why we do not do the obvious to protect our vote. Democrats have promoted systems, like early voting, as a means of destroying the integrity of the election process.
A good example of your Vanity work:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted on 10/9/2016, 7:47:18 PM by Kevin in California
Ya’ll have yanked a few of my threads for the stupidest reasons. My last thread you pulled was the last straw.
I donate a good some of $$ to this site to keep it going but no more.
I know, “don’t let the door hit me in the behind” but at this poit, I don’t G-A-S!
Adios putos!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3478520/posts
Ink on thumb is only good to stop multiple voting. It does nothing for compromised electronic voting machines.
There is a big difference between the US and third-world countries that use the indelible ink (invented in India, by the way): the US population is much more mobile.
It's not an issue for me now, but for most of my career I wouldn't be able to vote on election day because I was usually at a client's office that day, a thousand miles or more away from home. With early voting, I could do it on the weekend. But in my state, it's only open on a weekend day about 10 days before Election state.
There are technological ways that we could eliminate fraud and provide a trail for the voter to verify his vote was counted, and correctly. And, it could be done in a way to prevent voter intimidation (i.e. you must vote this way to keep your job).
But, I'll wait until things calm down for a bit before I write up my proposal. I'd be interested in what FReepers think.
Doesn't prevent:
Doesn't prevent:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.